• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Willow Cove" Backported to 14nm is "Cypress Cove"?

So much for Intel 10nm is better than 7nm or even 5nm TSMC :p
 
The IPC is there, but until DDR5-4800 may not manifest itself very well. Everything is stuck now. Not constrained by 14nm, but other things. It will all come together nicely by 2024.
DDR5 will bring more bandwidth, not quicker response times. More bandwidth only benefits workloads which are bandwidth constrained, most are not, and those who need more bandwidth can go for HEDT and get twice the bandwidth.

If you want higher performance from memory, you want tighter timings. This usually requires higher voltage, and all the other problems associated with overclocking.
 
Intel_Transistor_Density.jpg

I believe this was the aggressive goal that the CEO Swan mentioned that caused them to trip badly. As it stands, I don't think their 10nm is as good/ dense as what was originally planned. Also if we expand this to 2020, "Others" would be a lot closer to their planned 10nm density than they are now since this graph stops at 2017 for the "Others" graph.
 
So the guys at Intel do not only have a million different (but essentially similar) architectures planned, but also different lithography versions of each architecture with a different codename. Who exactly are they trying to fool here?
 
What next Dry Lake?
 
Too late, their lakes seem to be dry enough already. :roll:

14 nm is dry lake :roll:
Looks like AMD is going to be KING for a lot of years, the fan babies won't like that:roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:
 
14 nm is dry lake :roll:
Looks like AMD is going to be KING for a lot of years, the fan babies won't like that:roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:
Fan babies don't care. They'll buy the next 14nm++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Intel chip and stick their pizza-stained "GAMING POWAH" flags on the front door as always. :roll:
 
Intel, lost the plot. They are all over the place.names and codes I bet even their own marketing is lost within.
 
Compromises from over-reaching. Skating on thin ice. Trying to use distractions.

Intel FAB progress is Frozen-in-lake .. Hey look, a polar bear.
 
Year 2030 Intel 14nm Mars lake. :laugh:
 
Back
Top