• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ENDORFY Supremo FM6 1000W Gets Prestigious Cybenetics Certifications for Efficiency and Acoustics

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
ENDORFY proudly announces that its Supremo FM6 1000 W power supply has been officially tested by Cybenetics Labs and received Platinum certification for efficiency, "A" for noise rating and Cybenetics 3.1 badge, confirming its outstanding performance in efficiency, acoustics, and electrical regulation. Following rigorous testing under both 115 V and 230 V conditions, the Supremo FM6 1000 W achieved Platinum efficiency certification, placing it among the most power-efficient units on the market. The unit demonstrated an average efficiency of 90.01% (115 V) and 92.18% (230 V) across more than 1,450 load combinations.

In addition to its stellar efficiency, the Supremo FM6 1000 W earned an "A" noise rating, proving its ability to maintain low noise levels even under demanding workloads. With average acoustic outputs of 21.91 dBA (115 V) and 20.50 dBA (230 V), this PSU is an ideal choice for silent PC builds and professional workstations. The unit was also awarded the Cybenetics 3.1 badge, recognizing its full compliance with version 3.1 testing protocols—the latest industry standard for PSU certification, which includes rigorous criteria for electrical performance, noise, standby consumption, and more.



Key Performance Highlights (as tested by Cybenetics Labs)
Efficiency Certification (ETA Platinum):
  • Average Efficiency: 90.011% (115 V), 92.182% (230 V)
  • Power Factor: 0.981 (115 V), 0.941 (230 V)
Noise Certification (LAMBDA A):
  • Low acoustic footprint: 21.91 dBA (115 V), 20.50 dBA (230 V)
Testing Date & Report ID:
  • April 17, 2025—Cybenetics Report No. 25PS2788A
Full test results are available on the official Cybenetics website: View Report

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
It's also worth noting that the Endorfy Supremo FM6 is a 80 Plus Gold certified PSU, so it outperforms its own efficiency class.


I still think any >850w psu should feature dual 12v-2x6 cables.
 
I still think any >850w psu should feature dual 12v-2x6 cables.
I'll assume you mean having a spare cable in case one gets damaged. Right? Because having two 600W rated outputs in PSU with less than 1300W is not how engeneering works.

As a remainder, The Third Great Purpose of Engineering (tm) is to try to prevent stupid people from doing stupid things. Also why failsafes like fuses exist, because preventing stupid people from doing stupid things is actually impossible. Preventing ignorant people from doing stupid things has also been proven impossible, because reading instructions is beyond what 98% of the population can do. :p
 
Who are Cybenetics :laugh:
Bah, just one of the two crazy guys from Greece, who put kilowatts through their PSUs for fun and watch the sparks and smoke. Don't worry, they are smart enough to always call the firefighters before it's too late.
 
I'll assume you mean having a spare cable in case one gets damaged. Right? Because having two 600W rated outputs in PSU with less than 1300W is not how engeneering works.

As a remainder, The Third Great Purpose of Engineering (tm) is to try to prevent stupid people from doing stupid things. Also why failsafes like fuses exist, because preventing stupid people from doing stupid things is actually impossible. Preventing ignorant people from doing stupid things has also been proven impossible, because reading instructions is beyond what 98% of the population can do. :p
Having a backup is one of the reasons.
I also want to point out that the new 16pin connector is implemented both on the 5090, a 575w card, and on the 4070 super, which draws 220w. Indipendent multi-gpu is a thing (3D rendering, machine learning...).

So dual 12v-2x6 (or more) on >850w PSUs is useful.
 
Last edited:
Having a backup is one of the reasons.
I also want to point out that the new 16pin connectors is implemented both on the 5090, a 575w card, and on the 4070 super, which draws 220w. Indipendent multi-gpu is a thing (3D rendering, machine learning...).

So dual 12v-2x6 (or more) on >850w PSUs is useful.
Not going to happen. Top of my head I can think of at least 3 reasons why.
 

"A note here about the pair of 8-pin connectors powering the unit’s 12V-2×6 cable, instead of a native one. In my expert opinion, this is better/safer since the load is distributed in two larger connectors instead of a single one, which helps keep the operating temperatures lower under high loads. Moreover, the corresponding cable can be bent more easily near the PSU’s side, without the risk of damaging the header and increasing the resistance of some specific gauges or pins."

I like this idea a lot after finding out it's a possibility. This will probably be my next PSU.
 
While I fully agree and support 3rd party reviews and specification approvals and testing, I wonder if the company provides a cherry picked PSU for testing or if it’s some random PSU off a pallet of 1000 of them???
 
While I fully agree and support 3rd party reviews and specification approvals and testing, I wonder if the company provides a cherry picked PSU for testing or if it’s some random PSU off a pallet of 1000 of them???
It's the same issue as with any product. Also, all PSUs from the same pallet are prolly of very similar build quality, but what about the pallet made six months later?

Not going to happen. Top of my head I can think of at least 3 reasons why.
#1 is fire hazard, #2 is fire hazard, but #3? Is there anything else that makes the new connector less suitable for multi-gpu setups?
 
#1 is fire hazard, #2 is fire hazard, but #3? Is there anything else that makes the new connector less suitable for multi-gpu setups?
I was commenting on anything less than 1300W having more than one 12V-2x6 and not about the connector's suitability for multi-gpu setups.
  1. PSU engineering rule: you can only provide as many power outputs as your product can concurrently support.
  2. Doesn't make sense financially. Why include an expensive extra conector in a cheaper PSU when 99.999% percent of the users will have at most one DGPU?
  3. Exposes them to unnecesary RMAs and possibly lawsuits whenever some braindead DIYer tries to hook up more load than the PSU is rated for.
 
PSU engineering rule: you can only provide as many power outputs as your product can concurrently support.
False, high quality 550w PSUs feature four 6+2 pci-ex connectors which are 150w rated. Not even taking all the others connectors into account.
Doesn't make sense financially. Why include an expensive extra conector in a cheaper PSU when 99.999% percent of the users will have at most one DGPU?
It won't make any difference, profit wise, installing an additional connector (50 cent?) on a ~150$ psu.
 
False, high quality 550w PSUs feature four 6+2 pci-ex connectors which are 150w rated. Not even taking all the others connectors into account.
Do yo know anyone that has ever bought a "high quality 550w PSU" in the last 10 years that also bought high-powered components? No, you don't.
You can argue all day long and the fact is 550W is a low-budget choice you buy when you don't even have a DGPU, if you can find one. Most likely you'll end up with something Bronze-certified in the 650-800W range.

It won't make any difference, profit wise, installing an additional connector (50 cent?) on a ~150$ psu.
Is that what you think? That it's just a matter of cutting another hole in the enclosure to put a connector? :roll:

FYI, the cost of the connector itself might be 50 cents but the cost of redesigning the power rails and everything else requiered for your additional connector plus manufacturing, testing and certification is in the order of USD houndreds of thousands. Thats a 1 with 5 zeroes and that's the lower bound. A proper estimate would propably land you around half a million dollars or maybe a little less if we're talking about modifying an existing design.

So, as you can see, adding the connector you want will inflate the price per unit by 10-20% so people will just buy the other PSUs with only one 12v2x6 connector and the manufacturer will suffer a huge loss from product that won't sell. And since PSU manufacturers aren't ignorant of this, they will just continue making 850W PSUs with only one 12v2x6.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top