• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA in a Rush for 55nm Parts, has Partners 'Red-Eyed'

Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Messages
2,582 (0.41/day)
Location
Oulu, Finland
System Name Enslaver :)
Processor Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming B650-Plus
Cooling CPU: Noctua NH-D14 with LED fans, Case: 2 front in - 1 rear out
Memory 2x16GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF RTX 4070Ti OC
Storage Samsung Evo Plus 1TB NVMe , internal WD Red 4TB for storage, WD Book 8TB
Display(s) LG CX OLED 65"
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II Mesh C Performance
Audio Device(s) HDMI audio powering Dolby Digital audio on 5.1 Z960 speaker system
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard ASUS Strix Tactic Pro
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Why could nvidia not have made the transition earlier.. now the lineup will get even more confusing.. ati makes ONE 4870 and ONE 4850..
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,147 (0.77/day)
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s) Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s) onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard same
VR HMD nah
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
the point is the largest segment of graphics card sales is under 100 bucks your forgetting that bta.

where the 3850 is likely to dominate. is already tops wiz's price/perf charts. though to be true ati is about to launch lower 4000series cards which will change that bracket. and their specs don't look anywhere close to those of the 3850.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
4,378 (0.69/day)
Location
Hurst, Texas
System Name The86
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASROCKS B450 Steel Legend
Cooling AMD Stealth
Memory 2x8gb DDR4 3200 Corsair
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3060 Ti
Storage WD Black 512gb, WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) AOC 24in
Case Raidmax Alpha Prime
Power Supply 700W Thermaltake Smart
Mouse Logitech Mx510
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow 2012
Software Windows 10 Professional
the 3850 looses to the 9600GSO don't forget that. Also for gaming on a super tight budget an 8500GT or 8600GT is a nice card also. I can't see Nvidia being to hurt even in the FX days they had more market share simply because of marketing and feature wise the FX5200 looked better than the 9200, even if it was slower. Nvidia marketing and the price/preformance of the lower end G92/G94/G84/G86 will keep Nvidia in the game even if GT200 doesnt do well
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,388 (7.68/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Yeah, but the revised pricing throws HD3850 back into the $80 ~ $110 range.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,250 (0.90/day)
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
sure ati go to drop prices more
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
3,942 (0.64/day)
System Name Widow
Processor Ryzen 7600x
Motherboard AsRock B650 HDVM.2
Cooling CPU : Corsair Hydro XC7 }{ GPU: EK FC 1080 via Magicool 360 III PRO > Photon 170 (D5)
Memory 32GB Gskill Flare X5
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 TI
Storage Samsung 9series NVM 2TB and Rust
Display(s) Predator X34P/Tempest X270OC @ 120hz / LG W3000h
Case Fractal Define S [Antec Skeleton hanging in hall of fame]
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Xense with AKG K612 cans on Monacor SA-100
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Razer Naga 2014
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXIV ARR Benchmark 12,883 on i7 2600k 15,098 on AM5 7600x
It's terrible as it is but NV has to find out that they can't continue to sell their junk for so much. When the g200b GTX280 or whatever comes out it'll probably cost just as much as the 65nm GTX280. The performance will be improved but it will still cost too much. Mix that in with UMAP & I can see why distros have a problem with them. When it comes down to it, do ppl realy buy overpriced, undervalued cards, especially when there's something out there that costs $100 less & beats it. An e-penis can only get so big.


I guess you still either don't get it, or won't admit it, that the 280 offers something that no other card on the market can (which will probably include the 4870X2), and that is, virtually no texture loading stuttering, and consistenty solid minimum frame rates.

It's the first GPU to actually make proper 100% real time use of it's 1GB texture RAM.

For too long, people have had components in their systems that are top of the line, high end, and in some cases overkill for the applications they are attempting to run. Yet the GPU is the thing that holds them back, with it's hitching, bottoming-out RAMDAC, and instabilities.

The 4870 might be on par with top-end potential frame rates, but 80 fps is not what I need to 'get my game on.' I don't need 60, 50 or even 40 frames for that matter. What I need, what we all need, is a card they lets us stay consistent as much as possible. To take whatever the game throws at it, chew it up, and spit it back out while grinning the whole time.


Nvidia knows that consumers in 'the know,' will pay the premium price just for this aspect alone.

The problem is, that the general consumer isn't aware of these issues; or rather they notice them, yet cannot define or comprehend them - thus not being able to realise that the GTX 280 resolves said issues.

THAT part of it, will hurt Nvidia, yet again, with the amount of money and resources they have, they probably don't care.

They'll drag out the price on the 280 as long as they can, and for good reason.

Which leads us back to square one : People on a budget need to stop bitching that they can't have high-end products at a non-budget price.

On a lighter note, consider that there's plenty of cards already on the market (pre 4800/200) that can handle a lot of 3d applications without a problem; and now, they're becoming cheaper.
If anything, rejoice that your budget can accomodate a nice piece of hardware, and let those people who are fortunate enough to have lots of money, be able to enjoy the 'best of the best,'
rather than crying and bitching about it.

Life.... deal with it.
 

imperialreign

New Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Messages
7,043 (1.15/day)
Location
Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
System Name УльтраФиолет
Processor Intel Kentsfield Q9650 @ 3.8GHz (4.2GHz highest achieved)
Motherboard ASUS P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi; X38 NSB, ICH9R SSB
Cooling Delta V3 block, XPSC res, 120x3 rad, ST 1/2" pump - 10 fans, SYSTRIN HDD cooler, Antec HDD cooler
Memory Dual channel 8GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 @ 1800MHz @ 7-7-7-20 1T
Video Card(s) Quadfire: (2) Sapphire HD5970
Storage (2) WD VelociRaptor 300GB SATA-300; WD 320GB SATA-300; WD 200GB UATA + WD 160GB UATA
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster T240 24" (16:10)
Case Cooler Master Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCI-E x1
Power Supply Kingwin Mach1 1200W modular
Software Windows XP Home SP3; Vista Ultimate x64 SP2
Benchmark Scores 3m06: 20270 here: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12313
I guess you still either don't get it, or won't admit it, that the 280 offers something that no other card on the market can (which will probably include the 4870X2), and that is, virtually no texture loading stuttering, and consistenty solid minimum frame rates.

It's the first GPU to actually make proper 100% real time use of it's 1GB texture RAM.

For too long, people have had components in their systems that are top of the line, high end, and in some cases overkill for the applications they are attempting to run. Yet the GPU is the thing that holds them back, with it's hitching, bottoming-out RAMDAC, and instabilities.

The 4870 might be on par with top-end potential frame rates, but 80 fps is not what I need to 'get my game on.' I don't need 60, 50 or even 40 frames for that matter. What I need, what we all need, is a card they lets us stay consistent as much as possible. To take whatever the game throws at it, chew it up, and spit it back out while grinning the whole time.


Nvidia knows that consumers in 'the know,' will pay the premium price just for this aspect alone.

The problem is, that the general consumer isn't aware of these issues; or rather they notice them, yet cannot define or comprehend them - thus not being able to realise that the GTX 280 resolves said issues.

THAT part of it, will hurt Nvidia, yet again, with the amount of money and resources they have, they probably don't care.

They'll drag out the price on the 280 as long as they can, and for good reason.

Which leads us back to square one : People on a budget need to stop bitching that they can't have high-end products at a non-budget price.

On a lighter note, consider that there's plenty of cards already on the market (pre 4800/200) that can handle a lot of 3d applications without a problem; and now, they're becoming cheaper.
If anything, rejoice that your budget can accomodate a nice piece of hardware, and let those people who are fortunate enough to have lots of money, be able to enjoy the 'best of the best,'
rather than crying and bitching about it.

Life.... deal with it.



That's all fine and good, and I understand you're point to the minimum FPS rates . . .

but has anyone really stopped to think how much the system itself adds to this issue moreso than the VGA apdater itself?

Sure, it might take a 3870 1GB a little longer to load textures into VRAM, but sitting on a PCIE2.0 BUS decreases load times as well; but if you're trying to load up textures with a P4 sitting in the CPU throne, that in itself will drastically lengthen how long it takes for the VGA adapter to be able to load everything up. You're dealing with a massively bottlenecked system, a bottlenecked BUS, pathetic L1/L2 caches . . . all that can seriously anchor minimum FPS by extended load times.

Just in comparison with my system, I experience very little load-up stuttering and even then, the amount of time is minimal (except in the case of Crysis). Does it detract at all from the gaming experience? Not in the least, seeing as how it's only an issue once a game level is loaded up . . . once the game itself is off an running, I don't notice any other issues until you hit that one spot where it needs to swap in/out textures, and unless that 0.5s pause is going to get one's panties in a bunch, I find it nothing to complain about at all.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,745 (0.27/day)
Location
The Nevada Wasteland
System Name 9th Level
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard MSI X570 Carbon wifi
Cooling EK Basic 360, x2 250mm, x1 140mm, x1 120mm fans.
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3200mhz.
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 12GB FTW3
Storage 500gb ssd, 2tb ssd, 6tb HD.
Display(s) MSI 27" Curved 1440p@165hz
Case HAF 932
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Software Windows 10 64bit
Last edited:
Top