3dMark05 scores :D

[wazzledoozle]

I got a 1015
The CPU tests were running at 0-2 fps

 

[rikit_zap]

5547
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=27622
Try the ATI Hotfix. Supposedly for a game lockup. Raised '05 score by over 1200

That was weird anyway the link should work now.
I messed around a little and got it to 5803 but I think that
may be about it without a volt-mod

 

[Viper007Bond]

2318 -- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=6624

Didn't realize my card un-overclocked itself, probably when I upgraded the drivers. Doesn't matter though as I'm about to do a 128 MB 9800 Pro -> 128 MB 9800 XT conversion.

BTW rikit_zap - your link isn't valid. Update it to your new score or whatever you did.

 

[Freddy23]

5650

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=5452

X800 XT @540/554, P4 2,8C (Northwood) @ 3,2 GHZ, 1024 MB Ram...


More PC Details here -> http://www.nethands.de/pys/show.php4?user=Freddy23

 

[pablofrogo]

2897, with my card at 442.80/391.50 (no artifacts throughout!)
2700 at stock

 

[rikit_zap]

Thanks Viper. Fixed now...

 

[pablofrogo]

I'm going to run the game tests again, they look so good

 

[Slayerstaps]

pfff crap scores....25** with 4.6 catalyst 27** with 4.9 catalyst.

 

[Frozen]

I refuse to even run these any more

 

[pablofrogo]

pfff crap scores....25** with 4.6 catalyst 27** with 4.9 catalyst.

What do you expect? This thing is supposed to last at least 2 years.

 

[15th Warlock]

2343
That's less than the score I got at 3Dmark01 with my GeForce 256 SDR 3 years ago

 

[nightelf84]

2343
That's less than the score I got at 3Dmark01 with my GeForce 256 SDR 3 years ago

Warlock, what graphics card are you on? According to your sig, 9800Pro at XT speeds? you should get at least ~2700

 

[15th Warlock]

Warlock, what graphics card are you on? According to your sig, 9800Pro at XT speeds? you should get at least ~2700

Yes, but my mobo is an ECS M925 with a Via P4M266 chipset, that means I'm using a crappy memory controller that doesn't allow dual channell DDR operation, and I can run only at 4X AGP I think that's why I get such a low score I tell you this because in some benchmarks, I can see my CPU is a serious bottleneck, take Doom3 at the high detail setting for example: I cannot get over 42+ FPS, be it on 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768. But when I start using 1280x1024 my framerate drops to 38 FPS+.
I think getting 42+ FPS at all resolutions under 1024x768 means my CPU is a performance bottleneck, don't you agree? or... do you think I'm doing something wrong?

 

[15th Warlock]

Guess I was under the influence last night, I was wrong about the score I got, I checked it this morning, and I got 2422, not 2343, I'm not lying, you can check the date at the project's URL.
But in any case, do you think that's too low for my vidcard? I'm running on a WinXP SP2 OS tweaked for speed (by that I mean, my OS doesn't load all the crappy services or background programs) and using the new beta 4.11 Catalysts.

P.S. Kids, my advice is that you shouldn't post your scores while you're drunk

 

[d_o_n]

I got finally 5404 points. with my x800 pro @ xt 526/573 and a P4 3 Ghz.

 

[Slayerstaps]

What do you expect? This thing is supposed to last at least 2 years.

I don expect anything i just run it and look.
Eventhough they have a new even nicer 3dmark i still think 3dmark is not the way to benchmark vid cards or anything else. Just use games for that.
So i only ran it 2 times and it stay's with that
cause i just don like 3dmark that much anymore.....

 

[pablofrogo]

I don't get why you run it and look.. Look for atrifacts? or just look at the pretty colours (I do that, especially Proxycon )?

 

[Slayerstaps]

I look at the nice new technology that is usable for games nowadays. Although they don use it cause only some pc's can run those games at decent framerates.....
In my opinion 3dmark is more of a tech demo for new graphic technology and such...more of a look in the future to see how nice games are gonna look then

 

[ati.bob]

Slayerstaps's right.. 3Dmark is basically a demo that "over-stresses" some of the latest graphic fireworks that PC can generate.. It's not actually (read: not really) the performance you get on games unless those games that demand all the visual decorations to be turned on (really rare)..

 

[nczhivago]

oh my card is just 855 with sempron 2600 and 9550 128m

 

[MikBach]

9800PRO 256 MB 380/340
Cat 4.9
VGA 2445
G1 9,7 fps
G2 7,1 fps
G3 13,5 fps


Cat 4.11
VGA 2722
G1 12,9 fps
G2 7,5 fps
G3 13,3 fps

420/340
VGA 2922

460/360
VGA 3180

 

[ati.bob]

oh my card is just 855 with sempron 2600 and 9550 128m

OMG! Then the results of my PC must be more terrible than yours.. maybe around 500 3Dmarks..

 

[Slayerstaps]

Slayerstaps's right.. 3Dmark is basically a demo that "over-stresses" some of the latest graphic fireworks that PC can generate.

Dude, i'm always right (spam )
But yeah like i said it's just a sort of tech demo but not everyone sees it like that and only go for the scores...so that's why i think it's lame...real games still give a better impression of how good a vid card really preforms. Imo 3dmark is not capable of that...

 

[Xylitol]

6,300

 

[pablofrogo]

Update: With cats 4.11 I get 3170