• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AIDA64 GPGPU Benchmark

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,201 (2.72/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 2TB external SSD, 4TB external HDD for backup.
Display(s) 32" Dell UHD, 27" LG UHD, 28" LG 5k
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply Display or Thunderbolt 4 Hub
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 15.3.1
The latest version of AIDA seems to have a GPGPU benchmark. Like any other benchmark, let's pull together some numbers and start making some magic!

If you would be so kind to include a screenshot plus the table code, I will throw the results into this table for all to see and use. :toast:

Thanks to a recommendation by @kn00tcn, here is a table string template:
Code:
TYPE|MODEL|PHYSICALCHIPS|CORESSHADINGUNITS|SMCU|MHZ|MEMREAD|MEMWRITE|MEMCOPY|SPFLOPS|DPFLOPS|24BITIOPS|32BITIOPS|64BITIOPS|SPJULIA|DPMANDEL

Note: Please format the data yourself. I will not do it for you, so please don't only provide a screenshot. Thanks!

So, lets collect some data, shall we? For SCIENCE!

[TABLE=head]Type|Hardware name|Physical CPUs/GPUs|Total cores|Total compute units (GPU) or threads (CPU)|Core clock (Mhz)|Memory Read (MB/s)|Memory Write (MB/s)|Memory Copy (MB/s)|SP FLOPS (GFLOPS)|DP Flops (GFLOPS)|24-bit int IOPS (GIOPS)|32-bit int IOPS (GIOPS)|64-bit int IOPS (GIOPS)|SP Julia (FPS)|DP Mandel (FPS)
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 3820|1|4|8|4500|53558|62302|53341|130.2|75.83|76.24|75.65|17.05|118.6|62.83
2 GPUs|AMD Radeon HD 6870|2|2240|28|920|12289|11641|204820|3217|Not Supported|800.3|800.3|161.4|450.2|Not Supported
x64 CPU|AMD A6-3500|1|3|3|3450|23111|18677|18040|82.33|41.17|26.35|26.35|9.94|33.09|17.66
1 GPU|Nvidia Geforce GTX 285|1|240|30|648|7102|7006|124983|687.3|86.04|681.3|137.6|30.96|152.5|19.77
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 4770k|1|4|8|4500|30431|31185|27484|572.8|286.1|143.5|143.4|35.67|173.8|89.03
GPU|nVidia GTX 770 2GB|1|1536|8|1189|12088|11812|173079|3321|157.1|628.7|628.6|157.1|593.6|40.05
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 2670QM|1|4|8|2200|19770|20555|19681|169.7|84.72|88.10|88.09|22.01|70.05|36.64
1 GPU|Nvidia Geforce GTX 570M|1|336|7|575|5149|5166|57097|692.6|58.10|233.8|233.7|57.77|132.7|16.52
x64 CPU|Intel Core i5 3570K|1|4|4|4500|23957|24608|23215|283.9|142.0|141.6|141.6|35.52|110.7|61.43
1 GPU|nVIDIA GeForce GTX 680|1|1536|8|1058|12087|11921|150138|2968|140.4|561.8|561.8|140.4|497.7|35.79
x64 CPU | Intel i7 2600k | 1 | 4 | 8 | 4600 | trial version | 24598| 23359 | trial version | 145.1 | 144.8 | 144.8 | 36.25 | Trial Version | 64.3
1 GPU | Nvidia GTX780 ti | 1 | 2880 | 15 | 1274 | 6310 | Trial Version | 271714 | 5724 GFLOPS | 297.2 | 1175 | Trial Version | 292.5 | 1025 | Trial Version
x64 CPU|Intel Xeon E3 1220|1|4|4|3100|TRIAL|20571|19562|TRIAL|97.59|97.37|97.36|24.44|TRIAL|42.21
1 GPU|Nvidia Geforce GTX 550 Ti|1|192|4|900|6113|TRIAL|70735|684.6|57.37|229.8|TRIAL|57.04|130|TRIAL
x86 CPU|AMD Athlon XP 3000+|1|1|1|2166|2537|2330|2361|8.62|4.31|1.69|1.64|0.36|2.99|1.36
Q9550|1|4|4|3570|9395|8903|8761|114.2|57.09|57.09|57.09|14.27|48.92|25.82
1 GPU|Nvidia GTX 780|1|4|2304|1202|11965|11885|231119|4618|223.7|915.8|915.8|192.8|878.4|58.52
x64 CPU|Intel i7 3770k|1|4|8|4600|28731|36305|31129|290.6|145.5|144.9|144.9|36.31|121.2|64.23
2 GPUs|nVIDIA 560Ti|2|768|16|875|9030|8326|215508|2660|223.5|893.9|893.9|222.3|504.5|62.81
X64 CPU|Intel Core i7 950|1|4|8|4273|30331|24702|30328|135.5|67.75|67.42|67.49|33.82|70.27|34.16
2 GPUs|Nvidia GTX 780|2|4608|24|901|12130|12033|435708|7514|364.7|1493|1493|314.7|1432|94.64
X64 CPU|Intel Core i7 4770K|1|4|8|4400|32474|41603|35923|562.9|281.4|140.8|140.8|35.18|174.5|93.41
Gpu|Amd 7970|1|2048|32|1000|3272|trial|235123|4256|1060|4253|trial|202.7|625.2|trial
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 720QM|1|4|8|2800|15308|12734|14157|55.28|27.65|27.65|27.60|13.80|26.45|12.89
1 GPU|nVIDIA GeForce GT 240M|1|48|6|1210|3209|2909|20866|115.9|Not Supported|114.9|22.93|5.31|24.20|Not Supported
x64 CPU|Intel Pentium E2160|1|2|2|1800|4766|3656|3904|28.89|14.45|14.45|14.45|3.61|10.90|5.63
1 GPU|nVIDIA GeForce GT 430|1|96|2|1400|408.3|327.4|21096|266.5|22.37|89.47|89.48|22.27|48.70|6.22
2 GPUs|AMD R7 250+7850K|2|896|14|1100/720|16981|16625|52420|1579|98.71|1579|316.1|75.21|311.8|32.18
x64 CPU|AMD A10-7850K|1|4|4|4200|21621|11726|20375|133.8|67.03|33.51|33.51|4.15|35.55|18.27
x64 CPU|Intel i7 4770|1|4|8|4134|trial version|36489|33370| trial version |262.9|131.9|131.9|32.88|Trial Version|87.75
1 GPU|Nvidia GTX780|1|2304|15|1267|12752|Trial Version|245354 MB/s|4810 GFLOPS|233.5|955.5|Trial Version|201.4|916.5|Trial Version
x64 CPU | Intel i7 4770 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 4134 | trial version | 36489 | 33370 | trial version | 262,9 | 131.9 | 131.9 | 32.88 | Trial Version | 87.75FPS
1 GPU | Nvidia GTX780 | 1 | 2304 | 15 | 1267 | 12752 | Trial Version | 245354 | 4810 | 233.5 | 955.5 | Trial Version | 201.4 | 916.5 | Trial Version
x86 CPU|Intel Pentium 4|1|1|2|2800|3123|3095|3089|11.23|5.61|3.06|3.06|0.37|4.63|2.34
x86 CPU|Intel Pentium 4|1|1|1|2000|1952|2057|1903|6.97|3.68|3.84|3.84|0.18|3.32|1.77
X64 CPU|Intel Core i7-3930k|1|6|12|4704.4|66361|70235|63530|445.5|222.8|222.3|222.3|55.73|186.0|98.63
2 GPU|Nvidia GTX 780|2|4608|12|1254|23518|22229|505482|9513|472.4|1911|1911|477.1|1801|122.3
1 GPU|AMD Radeon HD 6770|1|800|16|960|5451|5328|62343|1231|Not Supported|304.4|304.5|61.30|170.7|Not Supported
x64 CPU|AMD Phenom II X4 955BE|1|4|4|3740|20880|11178|17634|119.6|59.80|38.28|38.28|14.44|47.57|24.23
x64 CPU|AMD Athlon 5350|1|4|4|2050|8622|4705|7799|63.46|16.36|30.79|30.77|4.02|26.12|11.71
1 GPU|AMD Radeon R3|1|128|2|600|3525|4727|9140|153.2|9.57|153.1|30.62|7.29|29.94|3.10
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited:
gpgpu.PNG


For CPU:
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 3820|1|4|8|4500|53558|62302|53341|130.2|75.83|76.24|75.65|17.05|118.6|62.83

For GPUs:
2 GPUs|AMD Radeon HD 6870|2|2240|28|920|12289|11641|204820|3217|Not Supported|800.3|800.3|161.4|450.2|Not Supported
 
Last edited:
Capture102.png


CPU:
x64 CPU|AMD A6-3500|1|3|3|3450|23111|18677|18040|82.33|41.17|26.35|26.35|9.94|33.09|17.66

GPU:
1 GPU|Nvidia Geforce GTX 285|1|240|30|648|7102|7006|124983|687.3|86.04|681.3|137.6|30.96|152.5|19.77
 
KursahGPGPU1.jpg


CPU:
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 4770k|1|4|8|4500|30431|31185|27484|572.8|286.1|143.5|143.4|35.67|173.8|89.03

GPU:
GTX 770 2GB|1|1536|8|1189|12088|11812|173079|3321|157.1|628.7|628.6|157.1|593.6|40.05
 
does opencl performance change across driver versions like dx & ogl do?

cpu turbo enabled makes the core clock numbers misleading, you can have turbo even with all your cores active in many applications

kn-aida64-laptop-gpgpu.png


CPU:
x64 CPU|Intel Core i7 2670QM|1|4|8|2200|19770|20555|19681|169.7|84.72|88.10|88.09|22.01|70.05|36.64

GPU:
1 GPU|Nvidia Geforce GTX 570M|1|336|7|575|5149|5166|57097|692.6|58.10|233.8|233.7|57.77|132.7|16.52


we should make some text that users can copy to make it easier

TYPE|MODEL|PHYSICALCHIPS|CORESSHADINGUNITS|SMCU|MHZ|MEMREAD|MEMWRITE|MEMCOPY|SPFLOPS|DPFLOPS|24BITIOPS|32BITIOPS|64BITIOPS|SPJULIA|DPMANDEL

each item is 1 word no symbols so you can double click to select it for editing
 
GPGPU_AIDA.jpg



x64 CPU|Intel Core i5 3570K|1|4|4|4500|23957|24608|23215|283.9|142.0|141.6|141.6|35.52|110.7|61.43

1 GPU|nVIDIA GeForce GTX 680|1|1536|8|1058|12087|11921|150138|2968|140.4|561.8|561.8|140.4|497.7|35.79

Thanks!
 
we should make some text that users can copy to make it easier

TYPE|MODEL|PHYSICALCHIPS|CORESSHADINGUNITS|SMCU|MHZ|MEMREAD|MEMWRITE|MEMCOPY|SPFLOPS|DPFLOPS|24BITIOPS|32BITIOPS|64BITIOPS|SPJULIA|DPMANDEL

each item is 1 word no symbols so you can double click to select it for editing

Excellent suggestion. It has been added to the OP. :cool:

The table has been updated.
 
Does cpu matter in the benchmarks?
 
x64 CPU | Intel i7 2600k | 1 | 4 | 8 | 4600mhz | trial version | 24598MB/s | 23359MB/s | trial version | 145,1 GFLOPS | 144.8 GIOPS | 144.8 GIOPS | 36.25 GIOPS | Trial Version | 64.3FPS

1 GPU | Nvidia GTX780 ti | 1 | 2880 | 15 | 1274mhz | 6310 MB/s | Trial Version | 271714 MB/s | 5724 GFLOPS | 297.2 GFLOPS | 1175 GIOPS | Trial Version | 292.5GIOPS | 1025 FPS | Trial Version

 
Last edited:
It's just for comparison purposes. It's worth comparing CPUs to CPUs imho. Comparing CPUs to GPUs isn't quite fair. :p
Why I asked was because I have my 7970 in a celeron machine for troubleshooting, but if I was going to do a benchmark I might want to put a beefier overclocked cpu in there. Or would the celeron not limit me.
 
x64 CPU|Intel Xeon E3 1220|1|4|4|3100|TRIAL|20571|19562|TRIAL|97.59|97.37|97.36|24.44|TRIAL|42.21

1 GPU|Nvidia Geforce GTX 550 Ti|1|192|4|900|6113|TRIAL|70735|684.6|57.37|229.8|TRIAL|57.04|130|TRIAL


aida64_gpgpu.png
 
AXP_x86_aida64_bench.jpg


x86 CPU|AMD Athlon XP 3000+|1|1|1|2166|2537|2330|2361|8.62|4.31|1.69|1.64|0.36|2.99|1.36

:)
 
Updated. Try to stick with just the numbers, the units aren't important since the table header already has them. :cool:
 
a barton eh? i can test a 2.4ghz OC mobile barton on xp32

Why I asked was because I have my 7970 in a celeron machine for troubleshooting, but if I was going to do a benchmark I might want to put a beefier overclocked cpu in there. Or would the celeron not limit me.

what kind of celeron, as in, what model & year/bios date of motherboard? i'm planning to go 7970/280x/290 but with a P5Q-E mobo with a bios from 2008
 
a barton eh? i can test a 2.4ghz OC mobile barton on xp32


what kind of celeron, as in, what model & year/bios date of motherboard? i'm planning to go 7970/280x/290 but with a P5Q-E mobo with a bios from 2008
Its an ivy bridge celeron g1620 2.7ghz, that I have overclocked to 2.8ghz because data loss is a non issue. Msi p67gd53 with bios from 2013.

I just decided to run the benchmark on my celeron anyways, and then on a beefier chip when I get the 7970 back where it belongs. See if there is a difference. Why not.

X64|Intel Celeron G1620|1|2|SMCU?|2800|trial|12955|12517|trial|22.07|43.95|43.95|64|11.05|trial|11.71
Gpu|Amd 7970|1|2048|SMCU?|1000|3272|trial|235123|4256|1060|4253|trial|202.7|625.2|trial

xq9Z5D7.png
`
 
Last edited:
Its an ivy bridge celeron g1620 2.7ghz, that I have overclocked to 2.8ghz because data loss is a non issue. Msi p67gd53 with bios from 2013.

ah dang, have you tried games on it? how cpu limited does it get? mine would be a Q9550 3.6ghz OC, which i guess i'll have to post the results here as well

would have 4870x2 gpgpu results but the vram has failed
 
ah dang, have you tried games on it? how cpu limited does it get? mine would be a Q9550 3.6ghz OC, which i guess i'll have to post the results here as well

would have 4870x2 gpgpu results but the vram has failed
Pm'd as to not disrupt thread more.
 
how much variance are you all seeing between runs?

kn-aida64-q9550-gpgpu-test1.png
kn-aida64-q9550-gpgpu-test2.png
kn-aida64-q9550-gpgpu-test3.png
kn-aida64-q9550-gpgpu-test4.png
kn-aida64-q9550-gpgpu-test5.png


the memory read in particular, but my test is done with no gfx driver so maybe every little UI update is taking up cpu usage

i'll put in my high numbers except the first mem read which was running while i closed the teamviewer connection, couldnt see anything close to 9500 since then so it must be a bad result

x64 CPU|Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550|1|4|4|3570|9395|8903|8761|114.2|57.09|57.09|57.09|14.27|48.92|25.82

also seems like aida's cpuid is not as good as cpuz's, it's not displaying the load clocks

kn-aida64-desktop-cpuid.png


EDIT: OP, i think a couple entries need to be adjusted, the gtx770 doesnt list the brand so it's not part of the sorting, the 2600k is missing 'core' so it's also not in the right spot when sorting
 
1 GPU|Nvidia GTX 780|1|4|2304|1202|11965|11885|231119|4618|223.7|915.8|915.8|192.8|878.4|58.52

x64 CPU|Intel i7 3770k|1|4|8|4600|28731|36305|31129|290.6|145.5|144.9|144.9|36.31|121.2|64.23

Capture.png
 
Updated with new scores.
 
The number sorting seems to not recognize decimal points.
 
The number sorting seems to not recognize decimal points.
That's because the "sort" that javascript is doing is a string sort, not a numeric sort. Unfortunately it doesn't give me the option of what kind of sort to do. Nor would it work if numerical fields have strings in them.
 
AIDA64GPGPUbench1-12-14.jpg



2GPU|nVIDIA 560Ti|2|768|16|875|9030|8326|215508|2660|223.5|893.9|893.9|222.3|504.5|62.81


X64 CPU|Intel Core i7 950|1|4|8|4273|30331|24702|30328|135.5|67.75|67.42|67.49|33.82|70.27|34.16
 
Back
Top