- Jun 23, 2007
- 16,991 (3.37/day)
|Processor||2500k \ AMD 3900X+NH-D15|
|Motherboard||ASRock Z68 \ ASRock AM4 X570 Pro 4|
|Memory||Samsung low profile 2x8GB \ Patriot 2x16GB PVS432G320C6K|
|Video Card(s)||eVga GTX1060 SSC \ XFX R9 390X|
|Storage||2xIntel 80Gb (SATA2) Crucial MX500 \ Samsung 860 1TB +Samsung Evo 250GB+500GB Sabrent 1TB Rocket|
|Display(s)||Samsung 1080P \ Toshiba HDTV 1080P|
|Case||HTPC400 \ Thermaltake Armor case ( VE2000BWS ), With Zalman fan controller ( wattage usage ).|
|Audio Device(s)||Yamaha RX-A820 \ Yamaha CX-830+Yamaha MX-630 Infinity RS4000, Blue Yeti|
|Power Supply||PC&Power 750w \ Seasonic 750w MKII|
|Mouse||Steelseries Sensei wireless \ Steelseries Sensei wireless|
|Keyboard||Logitech K120 \ ROCCAT MK Pro ( modded amber leds )|
|Benchmark Scores||Meh benchmarks.|
That for sure is a good thing. My comments were just regarding how funny it is that after so many years of AMD promoting VLIW and telling everyone and dog that VLIW was the way to go and a much better approach. Even downplaying and mocking Fermi, well they are going to do the same thing Nvidia has been doing for years.
Maybe AMD's way is better but it's wiser to do what nVidia started ?. As we all know companys have not really supported AMD all that well. And all so know AMD don't have shed loads of money to get some thing fully supported.
Not trying to say your wrong just saying we don't know both sides of the story or reasoning behind it.