• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD explains 4x4 architecture.

Canuto said:
Well intel has cornered AMD and the 4x4 ain't enough they've got to get to 65nm fast or they're history.

Disagree, sure Intel was on the wrong road for a few years, but they weren’t history because they didn't have the gamers. AMD is becoming more and more mainstream. With Dell beginning to sell AMD, and I believe HP already onboard AMD will be fine whether they can beat Conroe or not.
 
magibeg said:
I thought the K8L was just a die shrink? Are there other optimizations with it too? And i'll believe amd has an answer to conroe when i see some benchmarks for it :)

K8L is a die shring with MANY core improvements. *cough* IPC enhancements*cough*


i_am_mustang_man said:
is it just me or does the 4x4 3d06 look better than the other one? would it refine the image more to have these faster processors? are there any numbers or screenshots or higher res pics of this?

i'm sorry, i've never really cared about cpu performance in 3dmark before recently because i couldn't OC

Its a picture of a benchmark that has a finishing time dependent on CPU speed, so naturally they will be at different frames at the point in time. They should be 2 different pictures. ;)
 
Back
Top