• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD "Navi" GPU Architecture Successor Codenamed "Arcturus"?

Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,843 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
Really? It should be fairly well known how this works, it works the same way as with most other goods (TVs, cars, hair dryers, etc.). The product maker sells a product at a certain price to wholesalers along with a suggested MSRP for the product. And then the wholesalers and the retailers can choose to sell it above or below that MSRP, depending on if they want to make more or less money per product. The whole price spike on GPUs we saw last year and early this year was a spike on the retail side.
Yet you blamed Amd for +£100 msrp a few posts ago, Nvidias set their prices too high to start with.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,816 (0.91/day)
Yes & that was the retailers, in some cases the wholesaler, being greedy. In this case however if RTX models are still selling above their "suggested MRP" then it boils down to 2 more plausible scenarios ~ they don't have enough margins on RTX (% wise or perhaps due to lower volume) &/or they're having problems clearing the inventories of the erstwhile Pascal lineup. The latter was mentioned by more than one reputable source IIRC, so no this pricing fiasco is totally on Nvidia this time around & miners can't take the blame for this!
If retailers choose to overprice Turing while selling out Pascal, the retailers are to blame.

Yet you blamed Amd for +£100 msrp a few posts ago, Nvidias set their prices too high to start with.
No, that was AMD falsely claiming the MSRP of Vega 64 was $499, when it was actually $599 with $100 worth of game coupons included.
They did change this within a few weeks after massive protests, but people have of course long forgotten.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
725 (0.26/day)
Location
NL
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor INTEL i7-7700K | AMD Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard QUANTA | ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Air cooling 4 heatpipes | Corsair H115i | Noctua NF-A14 IndustrialPPC Fan 3000RPM
Memory Micron 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | GSkill Ripjaws 32Gb DDR4 3200 3400(OC) 14-14-14-34 @1.38v
Video Card(s) Nvidia 1060 6GB | Gigabyte 1080Ti Aorus
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB | 970 Evo
Display(s) 15,5" / 27"
Case Black & Grey | Phanteks P400S
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Li Battery | Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
Mouse g402
Keyboard Leopold|Ducky
Software LinuxMint KDE |UBUNTU | Windows 10 PRO
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
If retailers choose to overprice Turing while selling out Pascal, the retailers are to blame.


No, that was AMD falsely claiming the MSRP of Vega 64 was $499, when it was actually $599 with $100 worth of game coupons included.
They did change this within a few weeks after massive protests, but people have of course long forgotten.
lol. sorry i couldn't resist to laugh
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
547 (0.35/day)
Yeah 7nm is the real deal. 50M transistors /mm2. Current 14 nm with 25 Mtr/mm2 is simply unacceptable anymore.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,246 (0.49/day)
Yeah 7nm is the real deal. 50M transistors /mm2. Current 14 nm with 25 Mtr/mm2 is simply unacceptable anymore.
I dont know, my vega 64 still runs pretty well, and the 2080ti is a performance king, just way too expensive.

7nm is gonna cost a LOT too when it comes out, so itll take a few years for prices to fall, assuming AMD ever competes again.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,816 (0.91/day)
7nm is gonna cost a LOT too when it comes out, so itll take a few years for prices to fall, assuming AMD ever competes again.
Yes, the production volume will be fairly low for 7 nm in the beginning, until they manage to do major improvements to the process, either through the use of EUV or other means.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
4,984 (5.84/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
The situation in Poland is kinda funny now, it almost seems like retailers overpriced 1080Ti's after 2080 got bad press.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,877 (1.81/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
The situation in Poland is kinda funny now, it almost seems like retailers overpriced 1080Ti's after 2080 got bad press.
1080Ti's were never really cheap. There is a surge of miner cards to the used market but today almost all of these appear to be blower models.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,212 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,597 (4.32/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Unless AMD comes up with a way to have Zen like chips to form a single GPU, i don't see AMD catching up to nVidia in performance any time soon.
They can catch up and overtake Nvidia, there's no question about it. Is it worth it ? Probably not. Not even Zen was the best AMD could have made but rather it was a very cost effective design that was simply good enough for all intents and purposes. AMD got burned too many times investing tons of cash in high end consumers GPUs.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,816 (0.91/day)
They can catch up and overtake Nvidia, there's no question about it. Is it worth it ? Probably not.
I just love this level of ignorance, simply priceless. Once again, the story about AMD secretly winning by holding back.

On a serious note; their GPU department is burning money right now, if they could make a better GPU they would.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,673 (1.10/day)
I just love this level of ignorance, simply priceless. Once again, the story about AMD secretly winning by holding back.

On a serious note; their GPU department is burning money right now, if they could make a better GPU they would.
Yeah they're not going to overtake Nvidia anytime soon, but they're not so far behind that it'll take eons for AMD to overtake Nvidia's GPU. Unlike x86 or ARM CPU's a breakthrough in GPU tech is much more plausible & more likely. GPU uarch ~ as complex as they are ~ aren't comparable to what AMD & Intel (or ARM) do in their free time.

Burning money, so they're making a loss, this based on what exactly?
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
920 (0.24/day)
Location
Chicago, Illinois
I dont know, my vega 64 still runs pretty well, and the 2080ti is a performance king, just way too expensive.

7nm is gonna cost a LOT too when it comes out, so itll take a few years for prices to fall, assuming AMD ever competes again.
AMD can easily compete with a card a little better than a 1080ti and better pricing than the RTX series. Freesync is AMD's weapon X. The only reason I would go with Nvidia is only for 4K gaming, aside from that I think a 1080ti is the best performer until you have to pay for Gsync. That's where I tell people to go with AMD for a whole lot less money.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
750 (0.19/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 GB Ballistix Elite DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 590 OC Special Edition
Storage Sabrent Rocket NVMe 4.0 1TB
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q
Case Corsair Carbide 600Q
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 750W Titanium
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,246 (0.49/day)
If you turn 360 degrees, you won't be walking away.
......michael jackson moonwalks backwards. Cmon man. This is easy stuff.

They can catch up and overtake Nvidia, there's no question about it. Is it worth it ? Probably not. Not even Zen was the best AMD could have made but rather it was a very cost effective design that was simply good enough for all intents and purposes. AMD got burned too many times investing tons of cash in high end consumers GPUs.
I'm fine with them not going uber high end. Polaris was good, we were just begging for a 3072 core part with a 384 bit bus for SOMETHING faster then a 290x.

Vega 56 fit that mold well, as the middle-high end gray area sells well and has fat margins, it was just a year too late.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
725 (0.26/day)
Location
NL
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor INTEL i7-7700K | AMD Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard QUANTA | ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Air cooling 4 heatpipes | Corsair H115i | Noctua NF-A14 IndustrialPPC Fan 3000RPM
Memory Micron 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | GSkill Ripjaws 32Gb DDR4 3200 3400(OC) 14-14-14-34 @1.38v
Video Card(s) Nvidia 1060 6GB | Gigabyte 1080Ti Aorus
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB | 970 Evo
Display(s) 15,5" / 27"
Case Black & Grey | Phanteks P400S
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Li Battery | Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
Mouse g402
Keyboard Leopold|Ducky
Software LinuxMint KDE |UBUNTU | Windows 10 PRO
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
They can catch up and overtake Nvidia, there's no question about it. Is it worth it ? Probably not. Not even Zen was the best AMD could have made but rather it was a very cost effective design that was simply good enough for all intents and purposes. AMD got burned too many times investing tons of cash in high end consumers GPUs.
For me, zen is simply brilliant design and clear winner in terms of price/perf. But, when we talk about GPU, it's a different story. It's not easy to compete with nvidia. They have a lot of resources in both R&D and Marketing. Nvidia can easily tackle AMD in every way. When AMD has powerful GPU to offer then they will somehow cripple its performance by taking control of game development in some games (i believe they can easily control most of AAA games development). It's also happened in the scientific world with their CUDA proprietary. They have lots of resources to back up and support their CUDA environments.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,246 (0.49/day)
For me, zen is simply brilliant design and clear winner in terms of price/perf. But, when we talk about GPU, it's a different story. It's not easy to compete with nvidia. They have a lot of resources in both R&D and Marketing. Nvidia can easily tackle AMD in every way. When AMD has powerful GPU to offer then they will somehow cripple its performance by taking control of game development in some games (i believe they can easily control most of AAA games development). It's also happened in the scientific world with their CUDA proprietary. They have lots of resources to back up and support their CUDA environments.
You say that, but PC games blatantly favoring nvidia are not as common as they used to be. The consoles running AMD hardware has had an effect.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,843 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
For me, zen is simply brilliant design and clear winner in terms of price/perf. But, when we talk about GPU, it's a different story. It's not easy to compete with nvidia. They have a lot of resources in both R&D and Marketing. Nvidia can easily tackle AMD in every way. When AMD has powerful GPU to offer then they will somehow cripple its performance by taking control of game development in some games (i believe they can easily control most of AAA games development). It's also happened in the scientific world with their CUDA proprietary. They have lots of resources to back up and support their CUDA environments.
It is and arcturus could be, they are said to be and admitted they wanted to bring the zen ideology to graphics, personally I think they will at some point around 7nm but I am thinking lately ,if Ms knows that rays are coming Amd would be told and they know Ai is a thing so why not go all in on chiplets.
Modular with two gpu an Nnapi chip and something for rays(chip) on one package.

Who knows , it's a good pr spoiler, traditional style now RTX is out.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Messages
244 (0.08/day)
To be honest instead meaningless code-names I would actually prefer some meaningful availability of Navi, but oh wait at best it's 2 years away... And this Arcutrus (Charon Relay, yay for shameless Mass Effect plug ;) ) project that's like 5-6 years away? What's the point of even making this a news in any capacity.

In 2 years time we can have WWIII on our hands and people getting all excited about code-name of a VGA line that may not even materialize in 5-6 years time frame? :wtf: I missed some memo somewhere. In a word of immortal Anthony McAuliffe: Nuts!
 
Top