• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Polaris 10 "Ellesmere" as Fast as GTX 980 Ti: Rumor

Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
335 (0.19/day)
System Name Marmo / Kanon
Processor Intel Core i5 6600K / Intel Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z270X-Gaming 5 / Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Thermalright TRUE Spirit 120M / Noctua NH-U12S
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 21300C16 / 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 21300C16
Video Card(s) Palit GTX980 Super Jetstream / MSI GTX1080 Gaming+ X 11Gbps
Storage Intel 760p 512GB, Toshiba 1TB / Samsung 970 Pro 512GB, WD Black 1TB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2414H / Dell UltraSharp U2715H
Case Lian-Li PC-60FN / Lian-Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Creative SB ZxR
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 660W / SeaSonic X 750W
Mouse Logitech G1
Keyboard Logitech G413
Software MS Windows 7 Professional SP1 / MS Windows 10 Pro
Wow, $300 for 980Ti level of performance. If this is true I'll be switching to the red camp unless GP104 is even faster and comparatively priced.
 
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
23 (0.01/day)
System Name Tarro
Processor i7 3770@4.1ghz
Motherboard msi Z77A-G43
Cooling CM 212 Evo plus
Memory Kingstone Hyper Fury 8gb 1866mhz Black
Video Card(s) xfx 290x + accelero extreme 3 + MLU Bios +0.025v 1075/1375
Storage SSD 840 EVO + HDD WD 500
Display(s) Viewsonic 1080p hdmi
Case Corsair 200r
Audio Device(s) MB
Power Supply Antec HCG 900w
Mouse Logitech g502
Keyboard Ducky Shine zero Blueled
Software Windows 8.1 pro
4th generation GCN is not going to have large changes except for the shrinking itself, so I'm wondering how ~2.560 of these cores can outperform 4.096 cores from Fiji while still operating at a lower frequency. It would be nice, but I'm not convinced.


Sorry i didnt how to hide the image on a spoiler thing :)3)rz

And one thing.... people kinda not remember the relation performance between 780ti and 970
Still my bet is on .... something between 980 and fury/980ti
And for the price 300-400USD
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
842 (0.32/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Perf/price king /w focus on low noise and TDP
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H
Cooling Thermalright HR-02 Macho Rev.A (BW)
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP Black
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC
Storage 525GB Crucial MX300 & 256GB Samsung 830 Series
Display(s) Home: LG 29UB65-P & Work: LG 34UB88-B
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Essence STX /w Sennheiser HD 598
Power Supply be quiet! Straight Power CM E9 80+ Gold 480W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD optical
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M500
Software Win10
Can't wait to see what NVIDIA's and AMD's new gpu architectures have to offer. But I will probably wait for GP100 and Vega until I make my next purchase.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,312 (1.77/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
In a way I hope it's true. Maybe this will be AMD's repetition of HD5000 series. Those made monumental leaps in performance for very affordable price.
One can only dream about it...me included my friend, me included...
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
545 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 2400G
Motherboard Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling AMD Wraith
Memory G.Skill 2x8GB 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Dual-X OC R9 280X 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata 3 / Ultrastar 2TB / Seagate 2TB x2
Display(s) Samsung UN32EH5300 / LG 39LN5700
Case Phanteks Eclipse P400
Power Supply Thermaltake Smart PRORGB 750W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits
One can only dream about it...me included my friend, me included...
If you go back a bit, you'll realize it's not a dream, those leaps in performance were always present when shrinking the node and lets not forget that this jump is huge 28 to 14, because they skiped 20nm.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Messages
750 (0.42/day)
If you go back a bit, you'll realize it's not a dream, those leaps in performance were always present when shrinking the node and lets not forget that this jump is huge 28 to 14, because they skiped 20nm.
May be a dumb question, but why are we not getting leaps in performance with Intel's node shrinks?
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,104 (3.43/day)
May be a dumb question, but why are we not getting leaps in performance with Intel's node shrinks?
because they've already optimized CPU portion as much as they can, so they use the added space to increase cache performance and iGPU.

GPUs just add in more processing blocks, maybe chance cache hierarchy, layout, display controller, memory control. Very different is the purposes they are used for.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
767 (0.27/day)
Location
Norway
System Name Games/internet/usage - Server - backup - HTPC2
Processor I7 5820k - AMD A8-5600K BE - I7 920 - A8-7600
Motherboard ASUS X99-A2 - Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 - MSI x58 pro-e - Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI
Cooling custom water loop for cpu and gpus - CM - Arctic Cooling Freezer Xtreme r.2 - Noctua NH-U12P SE1366
Memory 16GiB Crucial Ballistix Sport 2666 MHz - 8GiB 1600MHz - 12 GiB corsair thing - 8GB 1866MHz - 8 GB
Video Card(s) 2x Radeon R9 290X CF 1100/1350 - HD 7560D - 2x Radeon HD6950 CF - A8 -7600
Storage Samsung XP941 500 GB - 60 GB SSD + 6 x HDD 4 TB in RAID 6 - 4 SSD and 2 HDD - 250 GB SSD
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP - Remote desktop - the Dell when in use - 55" TV screen
Case Caselabs Magnum M8 - Fractal Design Define R4 - Nanoxia DS 1 - Antec ISK 110 VESA
Audio Device(s) Toslink -> Shiit Modi 2 Uber -> Matrix m-stage -> HD650 - none - as main - HDMI out -> 5.1 system
Power Supply beQuiet dark power pro 1200W- corsair RM750x - Corsair AX850 - Antec 90 W pico power
Mouse Logitech G402 - remote desktop - Logitech G402 in use - Logitech K830
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB - remote desktop - Corsair K95 RGB when in use - Logitech K830
Software Win 10 Pro - Win server 2012 essentials - Win 7 Pro - Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Not high enough
May be a dumb question, but why are we not getting leaps in performance with Intel's node shrinks?
Short and inadequate answer: Amdahl's law.

Long answer: The task a CPU and a GPU are fundamentally different, but the core of it related to your question is parallelism. The GPU tasks are almost perfectly parallelizable while the CPU tasks normal users are doing are not. That is why Fiji has over 4000 cores while S 1151 tops out at 4 cores. Adding extra cores for the CPU does not help, so Intel takes the space saved in each node shrink and ads GPU and other stuff.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
26 (0.01/day)
If they are going for a sub 300 USD card, you'd be lucky if they get 390X performance!
Then nvidia will have its own mainstream card around 300USD which ultimately if history is our friend, will beats AMD in 75% of the benchmarks, which will have AMD drop 30 bucks off their original price to remain "competitive" but nvidia will still sell shit loads of cards because in the end, gamers want the best frame rate.

That's my 2 cents ...
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,246 (0.49/day)
Alright, I only did it the second time becaus3 he got choked up on it the first time. I'll play nice. What does Sony have to lose from putting that much power in a console? They still have the PS4 for casual gamers. Since the same games can be scaled up or down, they would not be dividing the market that much. (unlike the GENESIS, 3DO, Sega CD days)
They say the games can be scaled easily, but it still throws a different set of hardware into the mix. Different capabilities, a different GPU arch, better CPU speed, ece. They can say all they want that games will "scale" and be playable on both platforms, but devs have a very poor history of actually doing this.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,458 (0.46/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD FX-8350 4GHz@1.3V
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A UD3 Rev3.0
Cooling Zalman CNPS9X Optima
Memory 2*4GB Patriot Venom RED DDR3 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 Pulse 8GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, Samsung F1 1TB, Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
Display(s) LG IPS235
Case Zalman Neo Z9 Black
Audio Device(s) Via 7.1 onboard
Power Supply OCZ Z550
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 99p, multicore 647p WPrime 1.55 (8 cores): 9.0 secs
If you go back a bit, you'll realize it's not a dream, those leaps in performance were always present when shrinking the node and lets not forget that this jump is huge 28 to 14, because they skiped 20nm.
Exactly! It's twice as big the leap in performance for same architectures already. So, it can be used either to make an almost 2X GPU in performance in same die size and same power consumption, or a same level performing GPU for half the size and consumption. Polaris 10 is the 2nd option one. Vega 10 might be the 1st.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
61 (0.03/day)
http://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2016/04/amd-focusing-on-vr-mid-range-polaris/

Roy Taylor talks about Polaris.

"If you look at the total install base of a Radeon 290, or a GTX 970 or above [the minimum specs required for VR], it's around 7.5 million units," explained Taylor. "But the issue is that if a publisher wants to sell a £40/$50 VR game, there's not a big enough market to justify that yet. We've got to prime the pumps, which means somebody has got to start writing cheques to big games publishers. Or we've got to increase the install TAM [total addressable market].

"The reason Polaris is a big deal," continued Taylor, "is because I believe we will be able to grow that TAM significantly. I don't think Nvidia is going to do anything to increase the TAM, because according to everything we've seen around Pascal, it's a high-end part. I don't know what the price is gonna be, but let's say it's as low as £500/$600 and as high as £800/$1000. That price range is not going to expand the TAM for VR. We're going on the record right now to say Polaris will expand the TAM. Full stop."
What he doesn't tell is that, nvidia will have a replacement at some point for 970, at for sure will have 980+ performance at lower prices.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Messages
750 (0.42/day)
Roy Taylor talks about Polaris.
His point doesn't make a lot of sense. Early adopters of VR will need to pony up $$$ for headsets, video cards, and games if they want a good experience. It's always like that with new tech. Cards have existed for many years that have adequate specs for VR, they just aren't real cheap.

The top end Polaris 10 might make it to 390/970 level, but just barely. That means competing 28nm cards will be even cheaper for the people wanting the cheapest minimum VR spec. And it's not like Nvidia is going *only* build high end cards with the new node. It's pretty certain they will cover the full range with it before AMD does.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,458 (0.46/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD FX-8350 4GHz@1.3V
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A UD3 Rev3.0
Cooling Zalman CNPS9X Optima
Memory 2*4GB Patriot Venom RED DDR3 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 Pulse 8GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, Samsung F1 1TB, Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
Display(s) LG IPS235
Case Zalman Neo Z9 Black
Audio Device(s) Via 7.1 onboard
Power Supply OCZ Z550
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 99p, multicore 647p WPrime 1.55 (8 cores): 9.0 secs
http://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2016/04/amd-focusing-on-vr-mid-range-polaris/

Roy Taylor talks about Polaris.



What he doesn't tell is that, nvidia will have a replacement at some point for 970, at for sure will have 980+ performance at lower prices.
First bunch of GPUs from nVidia will be GP104 being available to buy in late summer. First bunch of AMD GPUs will be available in early summer and it's clear they will hit at price levels from the words Taylor let out. So, 290/970 level of performance for lot less money, power consumption and temps is the conclusion, which should make everyone happy.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,785 (4.09/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
In a way I hope it's true. Maybe this will be AMD's repetition of HD5000 series. Those made monumental leaps in performance for very affordable price.
In the meantime, AMD made it official Polaris 10 is a mainstream chip and Polaris 11 is for notebooks. Huge letdown as this allows nvidia to milk the high-end for another 9-12 months.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
842 (0.32/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Perf/price king /w focus on low noise and TDP
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H
Cooling Thermalright HR-02 Macho Rev.A (BW)
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP Black
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC
Storage 525GB Crucial MX300 & 256GB Samsung 830 Series
Display(s) Home: LG 29UB65-P & Work: LG 34UB88-B
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Essence STX /w Sennheiser HD 598
Power Supply be quiet! Straight Power CM E9 80+ Gold 480W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD optical
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M500
Software Win10
In the meantime, AMD made it official Polaris 10 is a mainstream chip and Polaris 11 is for notebooks. Huge letdown as this allows nvidia to milk the high-end for another 9-12 months.
High-end is such a small % of the market anyway. That's why the performance segment is usually the first to hit the market. This way companies also get to milk the actual performance parts as high-end if the competition has nothing similar to offer (see NVIDIA).
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,785 (4.09/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
High-end is such a small % of the market anyway. That's why the performance segment is usually the first to hit the market. This way companies also get to milk the actual performance parts as high-end if the competition has nothing similar to offer (see NVIDIA).
So you're saying AMD not having high-end parts is an achievement then?

Edit: Having a mainstream card that's as fast as 980Ti would be an achievement, though.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
111 (0.08/day)
So you're saying AMD not having high-end parts is an achievement then?
I think it's important to see what AMD is going for here. Polaris is around 2/3 the size of GP104. If Polaris XT manages to achieve 90% of say GTX1080's performance, then that's a win-win product for AMD. That was the case with the 4870 and GTX280, if you remember.

Polaris has 90% the FP resources of the Hawaii chip. I think Polaris has improved "shader-efficiency" over current GCN chips. Polaris should also have memory compression for frame buffer color data, which helped quite a bit with Tonga. Hawaii chips lack this feature.
In the worst case, Polaris XT will match Hawaii XT, which should place it in a very competitive position against Hawaii based cards.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,785 (4.09/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I think it's important to see what AMD is going for here. Polaris is around 2/3 the size of GP104. If Polaris XT manages to achieve 90% of say GTX1080's performance, then that's a win-win product for AMD. That was the case with the 4870 and GTX280, if you remember.
That's fanboy talk. We've been here before, here's how it plays out:
- Nvidia is first to the market with a flagship, milks customers for months
- AMD releases a flagship that's a tad faster than Nvidia's
- Nvidia cuts prices, so AMD gets no chance to make a profit

It's true that money's in the mid-range segment (and OEM), but let's not ignore the elephant in the room: this is the first time Nvidia will release a new flagship and AMD won't have an answer for about a year. And their argument about "VR TAM" is pure rubbish, that's what scares me the most - it means there's no other reason they did this except they couldn't build a proper flagship yet.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,467 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 620 / ASUS HD7870 2GB + GT 710 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
this is the first time Nvidia will release a new flagship and AMD won't have an answer for about a year.
Em... nope. It happened before. There are cases as old as the first 8800GTX and more recently as GTX 980. Other than a dual gpu card, AMD had no answer against GTX 980 for months. And Vega is not a year away.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
111 (0.08/day)
That's fanboy talk. We've been here before, here's how it plays out:
- Nvidia is first to the market with a flagship, milks customers for months
- AMD releases a flagship that's a tad faster than Nvidia's
- Nvidia cuts prices, so AMD gets no chance to make a profit

It's true that money's in the mid-range segment (and OEM), but let's not ignore the elephant in the room: this is the first time Nvidia will release a new flagship and AMD won't have an answer for about a year. And their argument about "VR TAM" is pure rubbish, that's what scares me the most - it means there's no other reason they did this except they couldn't build a proper flagship yet.
You're the one fanboy talking pal. A "flagship" card that costs +$500 and offer 10% more performance over $350 priced Polaris XT is not a win. That's the position Nvidia was in when they released their 200 series cards back in 2008, and they lost market share to AMD in that year.

As for Polaris 10 positioning, I don't think it's over-optimistic to expect Polaris10 XT to outperform Hawaii XT despite having 90% the SP count of Hawaii. Given the higher shader efficiency, new "geometry engine", pixel color compression, and potentially higher clock speeds of Polaris 10, I think it's highly unlikely for Polaris10 cards to not outperform their Hawaii counterparts.

The other point to be made is that it seems that AMD's cards perform quite a bit better than Nvidia's in DX12.
This trend will continue with the new cards, I think. This will help AMD in the benchmarks.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,114 (0.67/day)
Location
So. Cal.
I think we need to focus on RTG has said, this next release is to target the best performance for a given resolution. I see them at such a price point $300-350 offering great 1440p. There will be a part above that for 4K and V-R.

I think RTG is distancing the traditional idea of some price/performance benchmark leader dictating you get the utmost experience. Honestly, I don't know how RTG can thwart the ingrained perception of if you don't lead in benchmarks you lose. RTG will have to find a way that says for 1440p (or whatever) just looking at max/average frame rate is no longer the "end-all-be-all". The technology and hardware that improved pixels, more color, offer a more immersive experience is what you should look for. As long as the frame-rate and frame-pacing is smooth and consistent, you rely more on the hardware to improve quality; and less on the settings in the game or other middle-ware to improve what your eyes perceive. The problem is that becomes more subjective than a B-M just run with all the setting Ultra-out. Instead of games holding on to the dark, brood'ish, Cinematic or Comic book appearance, many games will make use of the such new technologies and hardware to offer more real-life immersive appearance, as what V-R is going to offer and feel like.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,815 (0.91/day)
I think it's important to see what AMD is going for here. Polaris is around 2/3 the size of GP104. If Polaris XT manages to achieve 90% of say GTX1080's performance, then that's a win-win product for AMD.
That would be an enourmous achievement. GCN is currently way behind Maxwell, and Pascal is a major architectural overhaul while 4th generation GCN is not. Keep in mind that Fiji is just performing close to GM200, even though it has 50% more theoretical performance.

A 200mm² chip is not going to be hig-end, and even AMD says they're targeting mainstream. You'll have to wait at least until Vega before AMD is even trying, if ever again.

Polaris should also have memory compression for frame buffer color data, which helped quite a bit with Tonga. Hawaii chips lack this feature.
How would memory compression help with bad performance? AMD has plenty of memory bandwidth, that is really not the issue.
 
Top