• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Preps First AM3-based Sempron Processors

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD is preparing its first set of Sempron processors based on the DDR3 supportive AM3 package. The first one, codenamed "Sargas" is a single-core chip that comes across as a single-core variant of the Athlon II X2 "Regor". It features a broad 3.6 GT/s HyperTransport 3.0 system interface, 128 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 cache, a dual-channel DDR2/DDR3 memory interface, an up-to-date AMD feature and instruction-set including AMD64, SSE4A, and AMD-V.

Sargas is built on Global Foundries' 45 nm SOI process, and has an operating voltage range of 0.85 ~ 1.35 V. The first SKU based on this core is the Sempron X1 140 (model: SDX140HBGQBOX). It has a clock speed of 2.70 GHz, and a bus multiplier of 13.5x. At that speed, its TDP is rated at 45W. It will be available towards the end of this week, priced around 35 Euro.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Hmm about 50$.. Well, I guess once all the AM2/+ stuff phases out, this will be a decent deal.
 
wow, this is the first time i've seen sempron, and misread it as "some-pron"


Not a bad little chip, office machines and even media PC's should run fine on a 2.7Ghz single core.
 
woo another failed x4
no matter, still has more than enough for regular computing
 
woo another failed x4
no matter, still has more than enough for regular computing

It's actually a cut down version of the Regor core, which is an actual dual core.
 
woo another failed x4
no matter, still has more than enough for regular computing

It's actually a failed x2 :P (regor a.k.a. athlon II 250)

Edit: Damn Shadow, fly like a butterfly, sting like a bee much? :D Beat me to it
 
socket am3 ? :twitch:

no, not AM3.

They had them in AM2, so they wont be far off launching them in AM3.


You could always get one and undervolt it yourself.
 
woo another failed x4
no matter, still has more than enough for regular computing

No, it's not carved out of disabling cores in a quad-core chip. At this time I can't say for sure if this isn't carved out of disabling a core from Regor (a 45nm "true" dual-core die).
 
no, not AM3.

They had them in AM2, so they wont be far off launching them in AM3.


You could always get one and undervolt it yourself.

i dont want to keep it at stock i want to clock it so it eats like my stock 4400+ 65w or something :rolleyes: if you understood me :o
 
I'm fairly certain that having one core disabled, will allow it to easily hit ~4Gh, considering that the average 250 usually does ~3,7-3,9. Don'k now if it will be any good with games with just 1 core tho...
 
if it is released at $50, i wonder if it'd be faster than a dual core 7750 kuma? i gotta say i dout it. Most kuma's seem to make it to 2.8-3ghz. So 3ghz dual core? or a guess at maybe 3.9ghz with the single sempron x1? i'd lean towards the dual. should be interesting to see benchies.

EDIT: actually the 7850 kuma is only $60bucks free shipping. most of the reviews seem to manage 3.1-3.4ghz oc on this. i think the 3.1ghz dual would win over a 3.9ghz single.
 
Last edited:
It should, but then again this one is much more efficient, the kuma was rated at 95W if I'm not mistaking? At 45W it looks like the perfect e-machine, you could probably cool it passively with a bigger case
 
Celeron E1400 is better...its Dual Core and cheap too sorry AMD, i have a linux system in plan...you don't need beefy hard. for X.
 
Last edited:
Celeron E1400 is better...its Dual Core and cheap too sorry AMD, i have a linux system in plan...you don't need beefy hard. for X.

It's an ok cpu, but it really just shows how crippled C2D is without sufficient cache. It's ok for office and internet i guess but FSB+very little L2 cache is a painfull combination in my experience for anything else
 
No, it's not carved out of disabling cores in a quad-core chip. At this time I can't say for sure if this isn't carved out of disabling a core from Regor (a 45nm "true" dual-core die).

yeahhhhhhh having to even respond to them is geting a little old, just makes them look stupid cause they dont read. noobnation.
 
Nice to see the Sempron grow up and finally get some decent L2.
 
:o
Celeron E1400 is better...its Dual Core and cheap too sorry AMD, i have a linux system in plan...you don't need beefy hard. for X.

e1400 does not support ddr3 and comes at 2ghz sempron comes at 2.7 stock + as many said you may clock it till 3.9 or something so they must be the same


is this the regor with a disabled core ?
 
It's an ok cpu, but it really just shows how crippled C2D is without sufficient cache. It's ok for office and internet i guess but FSB+very little L2 cache is a painfull combination in my experience for anything else

its a ddr3 chip even with a cheep kit itll be speedy and its 2.7 AM3, what experince do you have in an office with any of the above?? Might not run crysis on high but thats not what its for.
 
Wait, am I missing something here? I thought the new budget CPUs, ie Sempron equivalents, were going to be named Athlon II?:confused:
 
Back
Top