• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon "Navy Flounder" Features 40CU, 192-bit GDDR6 Memory

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,985 (8.38/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD uses offbeat codenames such as the "Great Horned Owl," "Sienna Cichlid" and "Navy Flounder" to identify sources of leaks internally. One such upcoming product, codenamed "Navy Flounder," is shaping up to be a possible successor to the RX 5500 XT, the company's 1080p segment-leading product. According to ROCm compute code fished out by stblr on Reddit, this GPU is configured with 40 compute units, a step up from 14 on the RX 5500 XT, and retains a 192-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface.

Assuming the RDNA2 compute unit on next-gen Radeon RX graphics processors has the same number of stream processors per CU, we're looking at 2,560 stream processors for the "Navy Flounder," compared to 80 on "Sienna Cichlid." The 192-bit wide memory interface allows a high degree of segmentation for AMD's product managers for graphics cards under the $250-mark.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,893 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
192 bit ? I hope that means 12 GB.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
9,868 (4.49/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i5-9600KF
Motherboard NZXT N7 Z370 Black
Cooling Cooler Master 240 RGB AIO / Stock
Memory Thermaltake Toughram 16GB 4400MHz DDR4 or Gigabyte 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 or Adata 8GB 2133Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus Dual 1060 6GB
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,893 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
yeahno, this sub 300$ card gonna have 6GB of video memory
Yeah no, 12GB means about 120$, totally realistic even for a 300$ card.

Both Navi 21 and 22 are likely on 256 bits with 16 GB. You really think they'd have such a discrepancy between them and Navi 23 ?
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
2,989 (2.34/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Not to mention that 12GB of VRAM for a GPU in this segment would be a complete and utter waste. The 192-bit bus is likely going to hold it back (I mean, it has the same CU count as the 5700 XT...), but if this is actually what replaces the 5500 XT? We're suddenly looking at some real exciting lower midrange/entry level GPUs again. Also, if the entry level is moving from 22 to 40 CUs ... a) what does that mean for the high end? And b) what does that mean for power consumption? Are they actually managing 40 CUs and a 192-bit bus at something like the 120-130W of the 5500 XT?

Bring it on.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
461 (2.76/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Not to mention that 12GB of VRAM for a GPU in this segment would be a complete and utter waste.
This is basically an improved 5700XT (higher IPC, better efficiency). 12GB doesn't look like a waste if you look at it this way, 6 would be definitely crippling.
The 192-bit bus is likely going to hold it back (I mean, it has the same CU count as the 5700 XT...), but if this is actually what replaces the 5500 XT? We're suddenly looking at some real exciting lower midrange/entry level GPUs again. Also, if the entry level is moving from 22 to 40 CUs ... a) what does that mean for the high end? And b) what does that mean for power consumption? Are they actually managing 40 CUs and a 192-bit bus at something like the 120-130W of the 5500 XT?

Bring it on.
We know nothing solid about AMD sizing at this point, it's just smoke and mirrors. there's no point worrying too much about bus sizes. As for TDP, 150W should be reasonably easy to obtain and will compete just fine with Nvidia.
 

Sykobee

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Messages
25 (0.18/day)
Might be destined for a 6GB 6500XT (32CU) and 6GB 6600 and 6/12GB 6600XT (36/40 CU)?
 

OGoc

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
22 (0.03/day)
So much speculation but ball park it we can: assume 7nm+ has 10% better performance per watt than 7nm and RDNA2 has 5% IPC improvement.

75 Watt equivalent to 1650 (PCIe)
150 Watt equivalent to 5600XT (6-pin + PCIe)
225 Watt equivalent to 2080 (8-pin + PCIe)
300 Watt equivalent to 3070 (6-pin + 8-pin + PCIe)
375 Watt equivalent to 3080 (2x 8-pin + PCIe)
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
461 (2.76/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
So much speculation but ball park it we can: assume 7nm+ has 10% better performance per watt than 7nm and RDNA2 has 5% IPC improvement.
AMD target is 50% perf per watt improvement, and rumors are they achieved 60%.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
152 (0.11/day)
So much speculation but ball park it we can: assume 7nm+ has 10% better performance per watt than 7nm and RDNA2 has 5% IPC improvement.

75 Watt equivalent to 1650 (PCIe)
150 Watt equivalent to 5600XT (6-pin + PCIe)
225 Watt equivalent to 2080 (8-pin + PCIe)
300 Watt equivalent to 3070 (6-pin + 8-pin + PCIe)
375 Watt equivalent to 3080 (2x 8-pin + PCIe)
Man, you are way off. Its a new architecture so die process improvement is not the only factor.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.56/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
Yeah no, 12GB means about 120$, totally realistic even for a 300$ card.

Both Navi 21 and 22 are likely on 256 bits with 16 GB. You really think they'd have such a discrepancy between them and Navi 23 ?
Why on Earth would you think that AMD is going to launch 16GB cards, when NVIDIA is sticking with 8GB? The answer is, they aren't. And as such this card, as a replacement for 5600, will have 6GB.

Man, you are way off. Its a new architecture so die process improvement is not the only factor.
No, it's a new version of RDNA.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,893 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Why on Earth would you think that AMD is going to launch 16GB cards, when NVIDIA is sticking with 8GB? The answer is, they aren't. And as such this card, as a replacement for 5600, will have 6GB.
Huh ?

In case you may have forgotten Nvidia isn't "sticking with 8GB", they also have 10 and 24 GB cards not to mention the leaks about even more higher capacity upcoming cards. Navi 21 is a large die >=500 mm^2 likely similar in performance with a 3080 and I can guarantee you it's going to have 16 GB of VRAM.

And as such this card, as a replacement for 5600, will have 6GB.
No one says it's a replacement for 5600 and even if it were no one says that it must have 6GB. This card is going to be noticeably faster than a 5700XT if it has 40CUs, can you imagine how stupid it would be for it to have less memory ?
 
Last edited:

OGoc

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
22 (0.03/day)
AMD target is 50% perf per watt improvement, and rumors are they achieved 60%.
Voltage and performance don't scale linearly. 50% increase in PPW applies to low end cards and only to a part of the total board's power consumption. 5700XT is only 8% higher PPW than VEGA VII at 4K (TPU PPW graphs) even though AMD marketing claims RDNA as 50% better PPW.

The GPU silicon uses about 30-50% of card's total power (use GPUz to find your core's power draw vs the total board draw).
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
236 (0.37/day)
I hope AMD will have a real launch with RDNA2, nVidia milked people too much with their RTX20xx and now with the paper launch and fake MSRP for the 3080.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
461 (2.76/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Voltage and performance don't scale linearly.
Of course not, and that rule is applicable to cards from all generations.

Anyways, the question is, where did you pull your 10% number? it doesn't seem to include any architecture improvement, or that is most likely a big issue.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,893 (4.24/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Voltage and performance don't scale linearly. 50% increase in PPW applies to low end cards and only to a part of the total board's power consumption. 5700XT is only 8% higher PPW than VEGA VII at 4K (TPU PPW graphs) even though AMD marketing claims RDNA as 50% better PPW.
AMD claimed 50% better PPW compared to non 7nm GPUs not against Radeon VII.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
513 (0.16/day)
I highly doubt this is a successor for 5500xt. This is most likely the 6700xt and will maybe have a cut down 6600xt version. 2560 cores that's 5700xt level. Add to it the 50% efficiency improvement then you get to either clock it up or drive power down. Most likely amd will clock it up to 2300+ and get a good 20% to 40% performance improvement if we also account for ipc improvement since primitive shaders will be activated in RDNA2. In other words, this gpu would be the 3060 and 3060ti competitor
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
471 (2.51/day)
40 CUs is a pretty substantial mid-range card. PS5 is RDNA2 with 44 CUs, and XBSX is 52. The memory bandwidth would be a better indicator to the level of performance they're aiming at.

Why on Earth would you think that AMD is going to launch 16GB cards, when NVIDIA is sticking with 8GB? The answer is, they aren't. And as such this card, as a replacement for 5600, will have 6GB.
AMD is weird. The 5500 XT had 8GB versions released (but also cheaper 4GB versions). I honestly could see 8GB GDDR6 being offered for low-end cards from AMD and 16GB from the high end.

I agree with you that 6GBs for the low/mid range would be the sweet spot. Also, given the 192-bit bus, I think 6GBs is most likely, but AMD could very well deliver 12GB versions of the card for kicks.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2019
Messages
71 (0.12/day)
System Name My PC
Processor AMD 2700 x @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming
Cooling Zalman CNPS20X
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 570 PULSE
Storage Adata Ultimate SU800
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX, 80+ Gold, 550W
RX 5500 XT has a 128 bit bus.
Bus wise this should be a 5600XT replacement with 4 more CU's and Navi2 improvements.
AMD will not release it with 6 GB Vram as they said gfx cards will less than 8 GB are not future proof.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,594 (6.09/day)
Location
The Kitchen Table
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Man, you are way off. Its a new architecture so die process improvement is not the only factor.
Correct, AMD might come out with a totally not optimized product because its new, it might be negative IPC for all we know.

The assumption it'll be higher and not just much bigger is unfounded, especially considering AMD's history over the last five years. If they deliver, fantastic. But to bet on it at this point... myyeah
 
Joined
May 20, 2020
Messages
89 (0.55/day)
I say it'll have 9 GB of RAM. :cool:
Seriously though I wonder if they sped up the HSR any on the "RDNA" cards or is it still at pathetic HD 7970 rate... Perhaps one could test it with Archmark benchmark...
 
Top