• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon R9 Nano CrossFire

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
19,945 (3.48/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
In this Review, we will test two Radeon R9 Nanos in a CrossFire setup, and we also include data for a R9 Nano paired with a Fury X, a combination that's possible on AMD because both cards use the same GPU.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
182 (0.05/day)
System Name xkche
Processor INTEL Core I5 6400
Motherboard Gigabyte H170 Gaming
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400Mhz (2133Mhz)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ (4GB)
Storage Crucial MX200 275GB
Display(s) 49" LG TV 49UH6030 4K HDR
Case NZXT 410
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Software Windows 10
Thanks!
How about VRAM usage?, with "just" 4GB.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,627 (0.40/day)
System Name Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus X370 Prime/ Lenovo Y580
Cooling Noctua / Big hunk of copper
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 Ripjaws with Samsung chips / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX R9 390 / GTX 660M 2GB
Storage Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB, 64GB Synapse SSD as Pagefile drive / Western Digital 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
Power Supply Antec Truepower Blue 750W + Thermaltake 5.25in 250W / Big Power Brick
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
So after the fuss of not getting a review sample, TPU strikes back with a Crossfire review. Nice one :D

Performance scaling is nice even in the lower res. Glad TPU did those too so one could see.
 

HammerON

The Watchful Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
7,913 (1.99/day)
Location
Up North
System Name Cruncher
Processor E5 2683 v3
Motherboard ASRock X99 Extreme4/3.1
Cooling EK Supremacy
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32 GB 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA 980 Ti Classified
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 512 GB + Mushkin Reactor 1 TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U3011 30"
Case TT Core V51
Audio Device(s) On-board
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Always changing~
Nice review:toast:
 
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
403 (0.13/day)
Processor i7 4770k @ 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Asrock z97 Extreme6
Cooling Watercooled
Memory 16GB @ 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
Case Cooltek W2
Am I missing it or is the review missing noise and temperatures?
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,842 (1.84/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer / Portable? / New Portable?
Processor i7 8700K 5.0ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2 / i7 7700HQ / AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Motherboard Asus Z370 Prime-A / Dell Dual Socket (R720) / HP Omen Stock / Asrock X570 ITX
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock / HP Stock / Noctua L9i (Yes L9i)
Memory Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb / 12gb DDR4 3 x 4gb / Corsair RGB 3200 16gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector) / RX 580 / GTX 970 (Temp)
Storage Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5 / NVME 240gb SSD and 1tb HDD
Display(s) Acer XG270HU 1440p 144hz Freesync, Acer B286HK 4K UHD Monitor / 1080p 60hz Freesync display
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case / HP Omen 17 / Fractal Design Node 202
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick / Fractal Design 450 Watt Bronze
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows Server 2008 R2 / Windows 10 Home / Windows 10 Pro
Glad you took the time to do this @W1zzard.

Interesting concept at the end there with the MATX cube build idea. Had not considered the idea that CFX might be a real option for the Nano (More in terms of why would you not just pick up something else) but that argument makes good sense. I think CFX values for Fiji do show the potential of HBM better than in a single GPU config especially at the 4K levels.

Meh, its not to unreasonable to think about purchasing 2 Nano's for CFX I suppose.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,413 (2.01/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
Am I missing it or is the review missing noise and temperatures?
<sarcasm>No, it's now an AMD sponsored site, so the chorus of crickets and fan noise get's hidden under the bed<\sarcasm>

I was just checking - ironically - I can't find a 980ti sli review... Can't compare the scaling - c'mon @W1zzard, for fairness we need a 980ti sli review. If there was one and I missed it, please accept my apologies. I wont be surprised if Fiji comes out better!

EDIT: glad i checked my post - my 'sarcasm' tag had the wrong forward slash and wasn't visible - sorted now....
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
216 (0.11/day)
System Name Tingle
Processor Intel Core i7-4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97-Pro Gamer
Cooling Scythe Mugen 4 PCGH Edition
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical 16 GB DDR3-1600 CL8
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Superclocked ACX 2.0
Storage Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250 GB + WD Blue 1 TB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2515H + Eizo FlexScan S2231W
Case Fractal Design Define R5 Black
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum Series 660W v2
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro
Glad you took the time to do this @W1zzard.

Interesting concept at the end there with the MATX cube build idea. Had not considered the idea that CFX might be a real option for the Nano (More in terms of why would you not just pick up something else) but that argument makes good sense. I think CFX values for Fiji do show the potential of HBM better than in a single GPU config especially at the 4K levels.

Meh, its not to unreasonable to think about purchasing 2 Nano's for CFX I suppose.
Yeah that build would absolute 4K gaming heaven :D

Then again, the Fury X2 will probably fit in an even smaller mITX case... It will be interesting to see how that card will compare to CrossFired Nano's!
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,488 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 710 / XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 620 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
Great. Thanks for the review.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
21 (0.01/day)
Processor Core I7 6700k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme4
Memory Corsair 2x4GB DDR4 2800
Video Card(s) MSI Fury X
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB
Power Supply Rosewill 650W 80+ Gold Modular
TechPowerUp, you guys seriously have to take out of your test suite Project CARS, Wolfenstein: The New Order and World of Warcraft. This 3 games really damage the real performance index of the AMD cards. Just take a look at all other games and notice that the performance the Nano, Fury and Fury X cards presents do not agree with the final performance summary, and that is just because of those three aforementioned games.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
2,747 (0.63/day)
Location
Minnesota
System Name I Dub Thee Infinity
Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard ASRock X399 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling Alphacool LT240
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 4x8GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 980 Ti SC+
Storage SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB, OCZ V2 180GB, 2x Toshiba X300 5TB RAID 1
Display(s) Acer XB270HU
Case Cooler Master HAF X
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium + Sennheiser HD598 + Klipsch ProMedia 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 850W
Mouse Razer Naga (2014)
Keyboard Gigabyte Aivia Osmium (MX Brown)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
TechPowerUp, you guys seriously have to take out of your test suite Project CARS, Wolfenstein: The New Order and World of Warcraft. This 3 games really damage the real performance index of the AMD cards. Just take a look at all other games and see for yourself that the performance the Nano and the Fury and Fury X cards presents do not agree with the final performance summary, and that is just because of those three aforementioned games.
To take out a game for that would be it's own type of bias. World of Warcraft still has something like 7 million subscriptions. It's a popular contemporary game that people want to know the performance of.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
21 (0.01/day)
Processor Core I7 6700k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme4
Memory Corsair 2x4GB DDR4 2800
Video Card(s) MSI Fury X
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB
Power Supply Rosewill 650W 80+ Gold Modular
To take out a game for that would be it's own type of bias. World of Warcraft still has something like 7 million subscriptions. It's a popular contemporary game that people want to know the performance of.
Sure, but that game already runs at 120+FPS on those cards. So there is no point other than to mess up the performance summary.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
2,747 (0.63/day)
Location
Minnesota
System Name I Dub Thee Infinity
Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard ASRock X399 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling Alphacool LT240
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 4x8GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 980 Ti SC+
Storage SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB, OCZ V2 180GB, 2x Toshiba X300 5TB RAID 1
Display(s) Acer XB270HU
Case Cooler Master HAF X
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium + Sennheiser HD598 + Klipsch ProMedia 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 850W
Mouse Razer Naga (2014)
Keyboard Gigabyte Aivia Osmium (MX Brown)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
@W1zzard Why is the Perf/$ page normalized to 200%?
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
7,386 (1.75/day)
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,488 (0.92/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Sure, but that game already runs at 120+FPS on those cards. So there is no point other than to mess up the performance summary.
There is certainly a point, Crossfire having negative scaling in WoW is a problem.
You are talking a about a game that has more players playing it, than all the rest of the games in the review combined.
Considering a pair of GTX 960 in SLI is almost twice as fast as a pair of Nanos @4k in WoW.
With no HDMI 2.0 it is 4k hell
What kind of crap 4k monitor has no Display Port?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
231 (0.09/day)
Sure, but that game already runs at 120+FPS on those cards. So there is no point other than to mess up the performance summary.
You can't just remove all the games that AMD does poorly in and call it an objective review. People want to know how well the card performs on specific games. If AMD cards underperform due to driver issues then that's something people want to know before spending $650.00.

If and when AMD fixes those issues the scores will reflect that.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,476 (2.02/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Excellent review, and almost a kick in the ass to see two tiny cards beating the crap out of the rest of everything on offer currently less one or two titles where crossfire support is lacking.


Kind of a eye opener looking at the performance of the pair compared to other cards, build a Micro ATX system with these in crossfire and the ability to game at 4K and good frame rates.......
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,284 (1.12/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
Thanks for the review. It's a good read.
I think I'll hold off on these for a while and see what else comes down the pike.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
3,095 (0.55/day)
Location
Visalia, CA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K @ 5GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime Z370-A
Cooling Swiftech H220-X
Memory 2x16GBs G.Skill Trident DDR4 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix 2080 Ti Black Ops Ed
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Sony 75" 4K HDR TV - Samsung Odyssey VR
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T
Audio Device(s) Sony STR-DN1080 - 7.2 Klipsch Dolby ATMOS Speaker Setup
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 1300W
Keyboard Logitech K830 wireless keyboard/trackpad
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
There is certainly a point, Crossfire having negative scaling in WoW is a problem.
You are talking a about a game that has more players playing it, than all the rest of the games in the review combined.
Considering a pair of GTX 960 in SLI is almost twice as fast as a pair of Nanos @4k in WoW.

What kind of crap 4k monitor has no Display Port?
I think he might be referring to limiting the HDMI output at 4K to 30Hz when using this card in an HTPC build connected to a 4K TV; very few TVs have DP, so that there limits the potential to build a killer mini-ITX rig powered by this card to place in a living room and play games at a decent frame rate.

As always, great review W1zzard, I actually considered using this card in crossfire at one point before the price was revealed, two of these cards deliver awesome performance!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
2,832 (1.76/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 6.7
Processor Core i7 3960X @ 4.5 GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 / 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 blowing in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Sniper 4x4 GB DDR3 1866, CL9-10-9-9-2T, 1.5 V
Video Card(s) G1 Gaming GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ ~1391 MHz Core / 1925 MHz RAM
Storage Samsung SSD 830, 128GB & SSD 850 Evo, 500GB & F3, 1TB 7200RPM / Seagate Barracuda Green, 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p@144Hz & 27" iiyama TN LED 1080p@120Hz / Samsung 40" 1080p HDTV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C, inverted design case
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Xtreme Music/Sony HD AVR@PC&HDTV @ Teufel Concept F &Theater 80 & Razer Carcharias
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ @ semi-passive mode on
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB Mechanical Keyboard /w Cherry MX Brown switches
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 4144 UG Superposition 1080p Extreme|6302 Time Spy|P16615 Firestrike|P21524 3DM11|X37002 3DM Vantage
I think he might be referring to limiting the HDMI output at 4K to 30Hz when using this card in an HTPC build connected to a 4K TV; very few TVs have DP, so that there limits the potential to build a killer mini-ITX rig powered by this card to place in a living room and play games at a decent frame rate.

As always, great review W1zzard, I actually considered using this card in crossfire at one point before the price was revealed, two of these cards deliver awesome performance!
As said probably a zillion times by now: get a DP to HDMI 2.0 adapter. If you got 650 or 1300$$ for graphics cards you can afford that adapter, I think. Or get one of the "very few TVs that have DP 1.2" for 4K 60hz. Last time I checked "very few" meant more than "none", so thats not exactly a problem, too.

Edit: thanks for the Nano reviews, I really liked the good pictures.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
3,095 (0.55/day)
Location
Visalia, CA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K @ 5GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime Z370-A
Cooling Swiftech H220-X
Memory 2x16GBs G.Skill Trident DDR4 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix 2080 Ti Black Ops Ed
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Sony 75" 4K HDR TV - Samsung Odyssey VR
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T
Audio Device(s) Sony STR-DN1080 - 7.2 Klipsch Dolby ATMOS Speaker Setup
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 1300W
Keyboard Logitech K830 wireless keyboard/trackpad
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
As said probably a zillion times by now: get a DP to HDMI 2.0 adapter. If you got 650 or 1300$$ for graphics cards you can afford that adapter, I think. Or get one of the "very few TVs that have DP 1.2" for 4K 60hz. Last time I checked "very few" meant more than "none", so thats not exactly a problem, too.

Edit: thanks for the Nano reviews, I really liked the good pictures.
Yeah, that's always an option, but that doesn't save the card from being criticized for not including this feature out of the box, it would've cost AMD literally a few cents to add this feature to this "premium card" considering it costs exactly the same as a full AIO water cooled Fury X.

And yes, this coming from a guy who has spent literally over $2.5K in video cards and a custom cooling loop for my main rig, but before you think I'm a hypocrite, let me say that I said the same thing about Nvidia when they tried saving a few cents on a $1K card by not adding a backplate to Titan X, so both companies are equally guilty of the same sin.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
21 (0.01/day)
Processor Core I7 6700k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme4
Memory Corsair 2x4GB DDR4 2800
Video Card(s) MSI Fury X
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB
Power Supply Rosewill 650W 80+ Gold Modular
You can't just remove all the games that AMD does poorly in and call it an objective review. People want to know how well the card performs on specific games. If AMD cards underperform due to driver issues then that's something people want to know before spending $650.00.

If and when AMD fixes those issues the scores will reflect that.
That's another thing we should stop complaining about: it's not the GPU makers fault if a game does not run well on its GPU, its the game itself that was poorly built. The GPU and it's driver (or its arquiteture GCN) were already there for the game developers to make good use of it. Hardware companies should stop trying to make shitty games run well if it wasn't meant like that in the first place.

So if you can't just remove games that don't run well on AMD hardware, to balance things out, it would be fair to include games that run well on AMD hardware but not on Nvidia hardware.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
2,832 (1.76/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 6.7
Processor Core i7 3960X @ 4.5 GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 / 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 blowing in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Sniper 4x4 GB DDR3 1866, CL9-10-9-9-2T, 1.5 V
Video Card(s) G1 Gaming GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ ~1391 MHz Core / 1925 MHz RAM
Storage Samsung SSD 830, 128GB & SSD 850 Evo, 500GB & F3, 1TB 7200RPM / Seagate Barracuda Green, 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p@144Hz & 27" iiyama TN LED 1080p@120Hz / Samsung 40" 1080p HDTV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C, inverted design case
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Xtreme Music/Sony HD AVR@PC&HDTV @ Teufel Concept F &Theater 80 & Razer Carcharias
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ @ semi-passive mode on
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB Mechanical Keyboard /w Cherry MX Brown switches
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 4144 UG Superposition 1080p Extreme|6302 Time Spy|P16615 Firestrike|P21524 3DM11|X37002 3DM Vantage
it would've cost AMD literally a few cents to add this feature to this "premium card"
A few cents? Architectural changes are more expensive than a few cents, get your informations right please. Is it not obvious to you, that they would have done it, would it have been a few cents?
So if you can't just remove games that don't run well on AMD hardware, to balance things out, it would be fair to include games that run well on AMD hardware but not on Nvidia hardware.
Afaik there are no games that run on NV hardware that bad as Cars on AMD. But there are games that run worse on NV hardware, for example Tomb Raider and that game is included. Also, all games that are used in the article should stay. There's no cherry picking in something like that, it wouldn't be "fair" - not to NV and not to the people interested in the card and the games.
 
Top