AMD Readies Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition

dj-electric · May 7, 2012

Man.. i kinda feel sorry for them, but at the same time happy that NVIDIA started kicking so much ass

the54thvoid · May 7, 2012

TheMailMan78 said:
Are you crazy?!?! Of course the new one will be better. Its got a sticker on it! Everyone knows 1337ness comes from stickers! Just look at ricers!

Stickers are for yesterday you hippy - paint it yourself....

(Yes colorful have an igame kudan 680 in the works, get your l33t graffiti skillz out.)

T4C Fantasy · May 7, 2012

the original price for the hd7970 was $549 it is now $479 so yes it had a HUGE price drop, unfortunately for me i bought it while it was 550, but i dont care xD, drivers are definetly the cultprit because the HD7970 is definetly superior hardware, 4.3 billion transisitors versus 3.5 billion in the 680 more gddr5 memory allowication and 384bit which i dont know why nvidia went back down to 256bit they even had 512bit at one point like the 295 i believe it was, if amd had the same team nvidia does for drivers you can bet your ass the HD7970 would crush the 680 in every benchmark possible

my HD7970 stats
GPU Clock: 1125MHz
Memory: 1575MHz
Pixel Fillrate: 36.0Gpixel/s
Texture Fillrate: 144.0GTexel/s
Bandwidth: 302.4GB/s

washd123 · May 7, 2012

TheMailMan78 said:
Now AMD is a far better deal.

...what?

how is paying the same price for a card that performs worse, runs hotter, and uses more power a better deal?

TheMailMan78 · May 7, 2012

washd123 said:
...what?

how is paying the same price for a card that performs worse, runs hotter, and uses more power a better deal?

1. Its doesn't "perform worse"
2. Runs hotter yet OC WAY BETTER.
3. Less then 1 watt at idle and now NVIDIA users care about power consumption?
4. 7970 is cheaper AND in abundance.

There is NOTHING wrong with the 7970. It was just over priced in the first month or so.

Xzibit · May 7, 2012

TheMailMan78 said:
1. Its doesn't "perform worse"
2. Runs hotter yet OC WAY BETTER.
3. Less then 1 watt at idle and now NVIDIA users care about power consumption?
4. 7970 is cheaper AND in abundance.

There is NOTHING wrong with the 7970. It was just over priced in the first month or so.

^To add to this...

From a price and performance stand-point the AMDs are better. As many have pointed out going from a 580 to 680 your getting less for your money at a higher price point as they are currently sold.

The 580s where not crippled as the 680 or for that matter the GK104 chip . Ofcouse this wont matter if playing games is your only concern but even then your still paying more for less of a product and features.

I sugguest you go read the Official Nvidia web-site forums and you'll find out a lot of 680 users are wanting features currently only found on the AMD 7000 series. The IQ debate over there is interesting. Oh wait what about the cry'n about the driver issues and all that jazz. Unless you have fanboy glasses on, reading Nvidias forums will take care of that. Heck they still have a thread going from 2009 on BSOD.

So unless your extremely partasin to one brand i dont see how 20-50 dollar differance is cause for such an uproar. Especially when you get pass the ?% overall benchmark disparity and you start comparing core features and abilities.

What am i saying. Keep posting i enjoy reading

phanbuey · May 7, 2012

These cards both need to be about $100 cheaper.

Casecutter · May 7, 2012

Well my take on this is TSMC finally got the 28Nm production figured out back say mid-March and by April AMD started seeing more chips like they had originally considered and developed as "Tahiti". (and why Nvidia was all "disappointed" dis’ing AMD, like they didn’t have problems of their own) .

The question not being answered here is... could these process improved chips now providing a 1Ghz, but offering the same power efficiency and TDP? It kind of reminds me of what was a original Fermi, and then what Nvidia got from their re-spin (GF100 Vs GF110). I don't think it's just marketing saying we’ll offer reference clocks at 1Ghz... but a re-release of what Tahiti was to offer originally. I mean what's the difference between this and what the GTX260 had when they release it as a "Core 216"?

That said those who went for 7970’s at $550 are a little upset though AMD never actually knew at that point TSMC could fix their issues or if Nvidia would fair any better, so you've got to go with what you've got. If AMD bring these 1Ghz I figure they’ll be a $480-500 price while they get the other moved out. If they hold or better the current power consumption, and can C-F with existing 7970 that might take a Bios flash to the 1Ghz. It's an equitable response to counter Nvidia, and not upset folk who purchased 3-4 months back.

T4C Fantasy · May 7, 2012

and yes there was those comparisons last gen, there is ALWAYS the same arguments year after year, it doesn't matter, the fact is the HD7970 is superior hardware, the drivers are to blame,slow development, rushing to be the first always has its downfalls, the proof is the benchmark comparisons with the preview hd7970 driver to the current driver, screw clock for clock the hd7970 can beat the 680 with base clocks if it had great drivers

Lionheart · May 7, 2012

Aaah love reading these comment's lol they always turn into debates :laugh:

DarkOCean · May 7, 2012

this mean "normal'' (non oc) 7970 would get cheaper or that the oc one would be more expensive? (gues the second option)

pioneer · May 7, 2012

T4C Fantasy said:
broken english... and yes there was those comparisons last gen, there is ALWAYS the same arguments year after year, it doesn't matter, the fact is the HD7970 is superior hardware, the drivers are to blame,slow development, rushing to be the first always has its downfalls, the proof is the benchmark comparisons with the preview hd7970 driver to the current driver, screw clock for clock the hd7970 can beat the 680 with base clocks if it had great drivers

if u just talk about driver issue - GK104 is far newer card - and even gk104 using sw scheduling system for gpu - but hd7970 using hw scheduling system for gpu

with this conversation gk104 is far more driver intensive compare to hd7970

here with hardware canuck domain test - gtx680 about 15% faster than hd7970

for better comparison in future game 3dmark11 told us gtx680 about 20% faster than hd7970-new games better run on gforce cards - and we bought card for new games - not for 2006 crysis

Frick · May 7, 2012

Dj-ElectriC said:
http://i.imgur.com/VXFP1.png

Man.. i kinda feel sorry for them, but at the same time happy that NVIDIA started kicking so much ass

I just .. so much to be angry about, so little time.

T4C Fantasy · May 7, 2012

pioneer said:
if u just talk about driver issue - GK104 is far newer card - and even gk104 using sw scheduling system for gpu - but hd7970 using hw scheduling system for gpu

with this conversation gk104 is far more driver intensive compare to hd7970

here with hardware canuck domain test - gtx680 about 15% faster than hd7970

for better comparison in future game 3dmark11 told us gtx680 about 20% faster than hd7970-new games better run on gforce cards - and we bought card for new games - not for 2006 crysis

show link showing hd7970 losing to gtx680 with no driver influence on both cards?

Edit, i dont see how its even possible to show a cards true performance since the drivers is what makes them efficient, ... fold with both gpus which ever one can fold with the highest points average i guess would show which one is truely the most powerful

Casecutter · May 7, 2012

DarkOCean said:
this mean "normal'' (non oc) 7970 would get cheaper or that the oc one would be more expensive? (gues the second option)

I say just going with the assertion that they'll be "just OC'd" is not entirely astute. They could be "Tahiti" the way AMD engineering anticipated would arrive from TSMC back last Oct/Nov; at 1Ghz while all within the 250 TDP. When they found the only way to maintain with the 250 TDP of the board design was to drop it to 925Mhz, it was the only choice without moving the launch back for who knows how long. And yes since that time AMD/AIB’s have been able to get improving binning of nice chips that OC, they still had exponentially higher power in achieving that. Now, the latest chip could provide 1Ghz, while offering the efficiency so many thought 7970's where lacking especially when OC'd.

Vulpesveritas · May 7, 2012

cadaveca said:
Where's the explanation...I don't care about results..I know it's slower. I want to know WHY it's slower, yet faster in games.

I mean, after all, wouldn't that kind of be a selling feature for HD7970? IT does what GTX 680 cannot?

Personally, i think it's a lack or internal caches that are the issue ,and are also why it runs comparitively cool. Buty I do not hear suc hthings, I jsut hear peopel claiming it's slower.

It's architectural. Nvidia simplified the CUDA architecture so it resembles more like the old Radeon VLIW architecture so they can get better pixel pushing, and lower power consumption, however this is at a sacrifice of computing power.

cadaveca · May 7, 2012

Vulpesveritas said:
It's architectural. Nvidia simplified the CUDA architecture so it resembles more like the old Radeon VLIW architecture so they can get better pixel pushing, and lower power consumption, however this is at a sacrifice of computing power.

That tells me what, exactly? It's very obvious it's different already, and you've said nothing other than that it is... :wtf:

I WANT SPECIFICS!!!

:laugh:

Patriot · May 7, 2012

The change in architecture is only part of it...

The 680 is a mid end card cranked high on clocks and turboed to fill the missing high end spot.
Like other mid series cards it has its dp gpgpu capability cut out... that is also why it uses less power.

Great on games sucky on gpgpu...less value for more.
If you only play games... its a great card. Unfortunately I use both so I spend less and get more...

Random Murderer · May 7, 2012

NinkobEi said:
Looks like there are already cards that ship @ 1100 mhz and clock to 1250. I'm not sure if this is a big deal or not.

it's not a big deal at all, as even the cards that ship at stock speeds can max out AMD Overdrive at 1125 core, 1575 mem without overvolting.
i wouldn't be surprised if these GHz Edition cards are simply a reference card with a BIOS flash.

T4C Fantasy · May 7, 2012

Random Murderer said:
it's not a big deal at all, as even the cards that ship at stock speeds can max out AMD Overdrive at 1125 core, 1575 mem without overvolting.
i wouldn't be surprised if these GHz Edition cards are simply a reference card with a BIOS flash.

i see u got the 3820, dude i couldnt wait for ivy bridge-e lol the 3770k is better technology and new shrink so i went with that instead

Vulpesveritas · May 7, 2012

cadaveca said:
That tells me what, exactly? It's very obvious it's different already, and you've said nothing other than that it is...

I WANT SPECIFICS!!!

How specific do you want it? :wtf:

Well, I'm no microarchitecture designer yet, so I can't tell you specifics beyond what I've read.
As you know, the original CUDA architecture used in Fermi was complicated, and used a lot of power to work with it.

AMD was at the same time using VLIW, an architecture great for pushing pixels due to the large number of shader units, however while it is good for simple parallel processing tasks, due to it's simplicity it isn't very suitable for computing.

With GCN, AMD decided to adopt a more complex shader architecture, closer to the CUDA cores present in Fermi, and made an architecture that was good for mostly any purpose, partially due to their future focus on APUs, and floating point math is a priority for the architecture. (HSA allows for floating point calculations to be done on GPU cores rather than FPU calcs on a separate CPU, and a GPU is better for floating point anyhow.)

Then with the GTX 680, Nvidia decided to focus on a gaming architecture, simplifing CUDA in order to fit more cores in a smaller number of space, and therefore improve rendering, however due to the simplification of the core design, computing is hampered, and may point to a complete split between workstation and gaming architectures for Nvidia. (this last statement is a personal assessment, due to the lack of a GK110 chip being present or confirmed for a gaming GPU at this time.)

That's how I understand it all.

TheMailMan78 · May 7, 2012

Vulpesveritas said:
How specific do you want it?
Well, I'm no microarchitecture designer yet, so I can't tell you specifics beyond what I've read.
As you know, the original CUDA architecture used in Fermi was complicated, and used a lot of power to work with it. http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_580/images/arch.jpg
AMD was at the same time using VLIW, an architecture great for pushing pixels due to the large number of shader units, however while it is good for simple parallel processing tasks, due to it's simplicity it isn't very suitable for computing.
http://images.anandtech.com/doci/4061/Cayman block diagram_575px.png
With GCN, AMD decided to adopt a more complex shader architecture, closer to the CUDA cores present in Fermi, and made an architecture that was good for mostly any purpose, partially due to their future focus on APUs, and floating point math is a priority for the architecture. (HSA allows for floating point calculations to be done on GPU cores rather than FPU calcs on a separate CPU, and a GPU is better for floating point anyhow.)
http://www.hardwarezone.com.sg/files/img/2012/01/Tahiti_II_M.jpg
Then with the GTX 680, Nvidia decided to focus on a gaming architecture, simplifing CUDA in order to fit more cores in a smaller number of space, and therefore improve rendering, however due to the simplification of the core design, computing is hampered, and may point to a complete split between workstation and gaming architectures for Nvidia. (this last statement is a personal assessment, due to the lack of a GK110 chip being present or confirmed for a gaming GPU at this time.)
http://media.pcgamer.com/files/2012/03/fermi-block-diagram.png

That's how I understand it all.

You just opened Pandora's box.

Crap Daddy · May 7, 2012

TheMailMan78 said:
1. Its doesn't "perform worse"
2. Runs hotter yet OC WAY BETTER.
3. Less then 1 watt at idle and now NVIDIA users care about power consumption?
4. 7970 is cheaper AND in abundance.

There is NOTHING wrong with the 7970. It was just over priced in the first month or so.

1. All the reviews agreed that the 680 "performs better" so it means that the 7970 "performs worse""
2. You're right from the point of view of percentage over stock but not many 7970 can do 1300MHz on air (maybe I'm wrong?)
3. 7970 at 1200MHz uses little under 100W more watts than a 680 at the same clocks.
4. Right

There's nothing wrong with the 7970 but it is still overpriced. Wait and see what the 670 will bring. (Unfortunately availability will be the main question)

N3M3515 · May 7, 2012

Crap Daddy said:
1. All the reviews agreed that the 680 "performs better" so it means that the 7970 "performs worse""
2. You're right from the point of view of percentage over stock but not many 7970 can do 1300MHz on air (maybe I'm wrong?)
3. 7970 at 1200MHz uses little under 100W more watts than a 680 at the same clocks.
4. Right

I think when themailman says it doesn't perform worse is the fact that you PLAY with both of them and you won't see any difference...

There's nothing wrong with the 7970 but it is still overpriced. Wait and see what the 670 will bring. (Unfortunately availability will be the main question)

At this point in time, the 7970 $479 vs gtx 680 vaporware or $600 - $690 where available, which one do you think is overpriced, which one is a better buy?

It doesn't matter what the gtx 670 brings to the table if it's going to be the same story as gtx 680, unavailable and where it is, it costs $100 more.

TheMailMan78 · May 7, 2012

Crap Daddy said:
1. All the reviews agreed that the 680 "performs better" so it means that the 7970 "performs worse""
2. You're right from the point of view of percentage over stock but not many 7970 can do 1300MHz on air (maybe I'm wrong?)
3. 7970 at 1200MHz uses little under 100W more watts than a 680 at the same clocks.
4. Right

There's nothing wrong with the 7970 but it is still overpriced. Wait and see what the 670 will bring. (Unfortunately availability will be the main question)

1. Depends on what you are looking for. Once you OC the 7970 is smokes the 680 and you gotta admit most people who drop this kinda coin on a GPU tend to OC. I mean if you want "plug and play" sure the 680 is better. If you are an enthusiast the 7970 is a better choice.
2. See W1zz's review.
3. Hows that 680 look at idle compared to the 7970?

System Name	Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor	Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard	Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling	TR Le Grand Macho
Memory	16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s)	RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage	Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s)	LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case	Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s)	On Board
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software	W10
Benchmark Scores	Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?

System Name	Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor	Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Ultra
Cooling	Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory	Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s)	Zotac GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Triple Fan @ 2040MHz
Storage	Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s)	27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case	Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s)	Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply	SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse	Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard	Logitech G915
Software	Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores	FFXV: 19329

System Name	TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor	RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard	Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling	MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory	ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage	256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s)	LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case	Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse	SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard	Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software	Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores	Benching is for bitches.

System Name	Chernobyl
Processor	10850K @ 5.1
Motherboard	MSI 490-A PRO
Cooling	360mm AIO
Memory	32 GB 4100 Mhz DDR4 18-18-18-38-440 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s)	MSI Ventus RTX 3080
Storage	3x1TB SSDs, 2TB SSD
Display(s)	LG 49NANO85 - 49" 4K 120HZ NanoIPS
Case	Zalman X3
Audio Device(s)	Bose Solo
Power Supply	Corsair SF750
Mouse	Logitech GPro Wired
Keyboard	tecware phantom
Software	Windows 10 64 Bit

System Name	Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor	Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Ultra
Cooling	Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory	Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s)	Zotac GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Triple Fan @ 2040MHz
Storage	Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s)	27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case	Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s)	Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply	SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse	Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard	Logitech G915
Software	Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores	FFXV: 19329

System Name	PC Mustard Race
Processor	AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Stock PBO On
Motherboard	Gigabyte Aorus B450 ITX
Cooling	4 x 120mm InWin Polaris RGB Fans
Memory	16GB Corsair LPX White 3200Mhz
Video Card(s)	Galax RTX 3060 Ti 8GB
Storage	1TB WD Black M.2 / 2TB Samsung 2.5Inch HDD
Display(s)	4K LG TV 60hz
Case	InWin A1 Plus Mini
Audio Device(s)	Realtek Audio
Power Supply	650W Gold Rated InWin PSU
Mouse	Wireless Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro
Keyboard	Wireless Corsair K63
Software	Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores	Don't do em anymore.

System Name	Black MC in Tokyo
Processor	Ryzen 5 2600x
Motherboard	Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling	AMD Wraith Spire I think
Memory	2 x 8GB G-skill Aegis 3000 or somesuch
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte RTX 2060 Gaming OC Pro
Storage	Kingston A400 240GB \| WD Blue 1TB x 2 \| Toshiba P300 2TB
Display(s)	BenQ GL2450HT
Case	Antec dumpster find
Audio Device(s)	Line6 UX1 + some headphones
Power Supply	Fractal Design Effekt 400W
Mouse	Logitech G602
Keyboard	Dell Sk3205
Software	Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores	I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great

System Name	[H]arbringer
Processor	4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard	SM GL
Cooling	3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory	16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s)	blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage	32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s)	headless
Case	Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s)	yawn
Power Supply	Antec 1200w HCP
Software	Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores	http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww

System Name	TOO MUCH RADIATOR! \| The TV Box a.k.a. The Shoebox
Processor	Core i7 4930K @ 4.5GHz \| Core i5 6600K @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard	Asus X79 Rampage IV Extreme \| Asus Z170i Pro Gaming
Cooling	Custom water on CPU and GPU, dual 360mm radiators \| Corsair H80i
Memory	4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX DDR3-1600 \| 2x 4GB G.Skill RipJaws 4 DDR4-3000
Video Card(s)	Sapphire AMD R9 295x2 \| PowerColor AMD HD7970
Storage	Samsung SSD 830 256GB, various others \| 2x 1TB Seagate Barracudas in RAID1
Display(s)	Dell U2713HM 2560x1440 IPS \| Panasonic TC-L32E5 1080p IPS TV
Case	Thermaltake Suppressor F51 (stripped down to hold two radiators) \| Cooler Master Elite 130
Audio Device(s)	RM-DAC -> Xiang Sheng 708b -> Sennheiser HD650 \| HDMI sound device on 7970
Power Supply	LEPA G1600-MA 1600W \| Corsair CX750M 750W
Software	Win 10 64
Benchmark Scores	over 9000 BungholioMarks, "Bitchin' Fast"

System Name	Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor	2500K / 6600K
Motherboard	ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling	CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory	16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage	SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s)	BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case	Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s)	Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply	Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse	Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard	Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software	Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro

System Name	Little Boy
Processor	AMD Ryzen 2400G
Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling	AMD Wraith
Memory	G.Skill 2x8GB 3600Mhz
Video Card(s)	Asrock Phantom RX 580 8GB
Storage	Patriot Viper VPN100 Nvme 1TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata / Ultrastar 2TB / IronWolf 4TB / WD Red 8TB
Display(s)	Compumax MF32C 144Hz QHD
Case	Phanteks Eclipse P400
Power Supply	Thermaltake Smart PRO RGB 750W
Mouse	Gigabyte Force M7 Thor
Keyboard	Gigabyte Aivia K8100
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits

AMD Readies Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition

Do you think HD 7970 GHz Edition can make HD 7970 attractive again?

Yes

No

For me it never lost attractiveness

Moderator

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

New Member

Big Member

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

Fishfaced Nincompoop

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

My name is Dave

The Anti-Midas

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

Big Member

Big Member