- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,097 (0.61/day)
System Name | Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep |
---|---|
Processor | i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset) |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29 Intel baseline |
Cooling | Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black |
Memory | G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz |
Video Card(s) | iGPU | NV 1080TI FE |
Storage | Micron 256GB SSD | 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1 |
Display(s) | LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27 |
Case | Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid: 2*TOUGHFAN 14Pro+2*Stock 14 inlet, NF-A14 PPC-3000+NF-A8 outlet |
Audio Device(s) | Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy) |
Power Supply | Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021) |
Mouse | Logitech Master 3 |
Keyboard | Roccat Isku FX |
VR HMD | Nop. |
Software | WIN 10 | WIN 11 |
Benchmark Scores | CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=35500 |
I'm sure if there money to make, a law suit will come shortly. But I doubt itNo I'm not a lawyer but I know enough to know that if you make statements about something being able to do X and then say elsewhere that in order to do X you invalidate your warranty - that is plain wrong I think under the US Magnuson act I think it is called they would be laughed out of court. In my country if you state something can do X and it turns out it can't it's called "not being fit for the purpose for which the item was purchased" as "the description of what the goods can do and what they can do differ significantly" and false advertising - all of these things are again something which is very frowned upon here.