• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Releases PCI-Express Power Draw Fix, We Tested, Confirmed, Works

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
19,591 (3.48/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
Earlier today, AMD has posted a new Radeon Crimson Edition Beta, 16.7.1, which actually includes two fixes for the reported PCI-Express overcurrent issue that kept Internet people busy the last days.

The driver changelog mentions the following: "Radeon RX 480's power distribution has been improved for AMD reference boards, lowering the current drawn from the PCIe bus", and there's also a second item "A new "compatibility mode" UI toggle has been made available in the Global Settings menu of Radeon Settings. This option is designed to reduce total power with minimal performance impact if end users experience any further issues."





In order to adjust the power distribution between PCI-Express slot power and power drawn from the PCI-Express 6-pin power connector, AMD uses a feature of the IR3567 voltage controller that's used on all reference design cards.



This feature lets you adjust the power phase balance by changing the controller's configuration via I2C (a method to talk to the voltage controller directly, something that GPU-Z uses too, to monitor VRM temperature, for example). By default, power draw is split 50/50 between slot and 6-pin, this can be adjusted per-phase, by a value between 0 to 15. AMD has chosen a setting of 13 for phases 1, 2 and 3, which effectively shifts some power draw from the slot away onto the 6-pin connector, I'm unsure why they did not pick a setting of 15 (which I've tested to shift even more power).

The second adjustment is an option inside Radeon Settings, called "Compatibility Mode", kinda vague, and the tooltip doesn't reveal anything else either. Out of the box, the setting defaults to off and should only be employed by people who still run into trouble, even with the adjusted power distribution from the first change, which is always on and has no performance impact. When Compatibility Mode is enabled, it will slightly limit the performance of the GPU, which results in reduced overall power draw.

We tested these options, below you will find our results using Metro Last Light (with the card being warmed up before the test run). First we measured power consumption using the previous 16.6.2 driver, then we installed 16.7.1 (while keeping Compatibility Mode off), then we turned Compatibility Mode on.



As you can see, just the power-shift alone, while working, is not completely sufficient to reduce slot power below 75 W, we measured 76 W. As the name suggests, the changed power distribution results in increased power draw from 6-pin, which can easily handle slightly higher power draw though.
With the Compatibility Mode option enabled, power from the slot goes down to 71 W only, which is perfectly safe, but will cost performance.

AMD has also promised improved overall performance with 16.7.1, so we took a look at performance, using Metro again.



Here you can see that the new driver adds about 2.3% performance, which is a pretty decent improvement. Once you enable Compatibility Mode though, performance goes down slightly below the original result (0.8% lower), which means Compatibility Mode costs you around 3%, in case you really want to use it. I do not recommend using Compatibility Mode, personally I don't think anyone with a somewhat modern computer would have run into any issues due to the increased power draw in the first place, neither did AMD. It is good to see that AMD still chose to address the problem, and solved it fully, in a good way, and quick.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
1,584 (0.34/day)
Location
Oshkosh, WI
System Name ChoreBoy
Processor 8700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Master
Cooling Silverstone HE01
Memory CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 2x8GB @ 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080 SC
Storage 250GB Samsung 850 EVO and the trusty old 250GB Barracuda
Display(s) Pixio PX329 and Dell E228WFP
Case Fractal R6
Audio Device(s) On-Board
Power Supply 1000w Corsair
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores A million on everything....
So, if your mobo fries... simply reboot and turn compatibility mode on. Seems like it should be on by default.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
965 (0.41/day)
Processor Ryzen 1200
Motherboard X370 Prime A
Cooling Wraith Prism
Memory 16gb
Video Card(s) RX580 8gb Nitro+
Power Supply Seasonic 620w
Software Win 10 x64
So, if your mobo fries... simply reboot and turn compatibility mode on. Seems like it should be on by default.
It fries when you use the 480 with a ancient motherboard witch has an ancient power delivery system.
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2016
Messages
168 (0.14/day)
System Name cryohellinc PC
Processor i7-4770k @4.5ghz
Motherboard MSI Z87 MPOWER
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series™ H115i
Memory Corsair Vengeance 16gb @1600mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Sea Hawk GTX 1080 2100mhz
Storage 3ssd - 64gb (software) ;128 (software + operational system); 256gb - Games + 1TB HDD
Display(s) PG348Q
Case Obsidian Series® 750D Full Tower ATX Case
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZxR + Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250Ω
Power Supply Antec High Current Pro HCP-1200 1200W
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei
Keyboard SteelSeries 6gv2 + custom O-Rings. Using Via PS2 connector
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
  • Like
Reactions: xvi
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
815 (0.19/day)
System Name Raptor
Processor Core i7 3930K@4.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 4*4GB Gskil RipjawsDDR3 @2133MHz 1.6v
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX980 SC
Storage Vertex 3 SSD 120GB + SanDisk Ultra II 480GB +1TB seagate
Display(s) ACER-H243HX 24"
Case HAF-X
Audio Device(s) on board Realtek
Power Supply Corsair 850HX
Software Windows 10 & 7 dual boot .
So, if your mobo fries... simply reboot and turn compatibility mode on. Seems like it should be on by default.
"the adjusted power distribution from the first change, which is always on" by default simply by installing the new driver .

The card will not draw full current while being idle on desktop , so obviously you can turn the second adjustment option (Compatibility Mode) on before running any heavy 3D application .
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2016
Messages
140 (0.12/day)
Shouldn't motherboard deliver a max of 75W per lane, even if PCIe card requests more?
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,194 (0.56/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Arctic Freezer Pro 7
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Kingstone 60gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
well thats very neat.
So it actually works and the performance does not suffer :)

Nice job AMD.

@tPU and chance of running a few more games to see how they react?
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.51/day)
Told ya all that modern GPU's have clever power delivery systems and it was an easy fix by just redirecting power from PCIe to 6pin. This means that fix doesn't actually gimp the performance AT ALL because it redirects power to 6pin. Compatibility Fix switch however restricts it to initially advertised 150W.

So, AMD actually delivered best of both worlds. Not only they fixed power delivery of PCIe without performance penalty, they actually delivered factory over-boosted card at expense of slightly higher power consumption. Because when you flip Compatibility mode ON, you actually restrict it to official 150W.

So, for consumers, it's actually a double win. Good job AMD and good job reviewers spotting this anomaly. In the end, we, the consumers benefit the most from all this.

EDIT:
They should rename Compatibility Mode to Power Saving+, Enhanced Power Saving or something more descriptive by itself than Compatibility Mode which can mean anything from software features to hardware features...
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,221 (0.23/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Cooleer Master RP M520
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
Shouldn't motherboard deliver a max of 75W per lane, even if PCIe card requests more?
mb don't have built in a current limiter and any consumer attached to it can draw more till something is kaboom
 

Norton

Moderator & WCG-TPU Captain
Staff member
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
13,805 (4.83/day)
Location
USA
System Name My Fortress/Julia (WCG)/Trish (WCG)/Ella (WCG)/Junior (WCG)/4P (WCG)/Kreij (WCG)/Trish02 (WCG)
Processor Ryzen 1700X/Ryzen 1700X/Ryzen 1700/Ryzen 1600X/Ryzen 1800X/Opteron 6168x4/FX-8350/Ryzen 1800X
Motherboard X370 Taichi/A320 Pro-VHL/B350 M/B350 M/AB350 K4/SuperMicro 4P/ASUS 990X/ Asrock X370 mITX
Cooling NH-D14/SNH-U14S/Scythe Mugen5/Scythe Mugen 5/NH-U14S/CM 212+ (x4)/Xig DK Nighthawk/Scythe Mugen 5
Memory 16GB GSkill TridentZ-3200 (1700X), 16GB GSkill FlareX-2400 (1800X),... various...., 4P- 16x1GB
Video Card(s) RX 580/HD 7770/HD 4670/GTX 1080/8400GS/onboard/GTX 1080/HD 7870
Storage WD 500GB SSD/Seagate 2TB SSHD, .... misc...
Display(s) Dual Dell Ultrasharp U2414H
Case Silverstone FT01B/Corsair 230T/Versa H15/Silverstone FT05/Define R4/custom/Tt P3 open/Define XL r2
Audio Device(s) on board (All)
Power Supply Corsair HX850/CS650M/Focus Gold 650/EVGA P2 850/HX 650/X Gold 1050/M12 II 750/X Gold 750
Mouse Logitech G300s
Keyboard Thermaltake Challenger Prime (Great for $30!!!)
Software Win 10 Pro (Fortress), Win 10 Pro (Ella02), Ubuntu for everything else
Benchmark Scores Why sit on the Bench when you can get in the game and Crunch!!!
My card is in a UPS truck atm so it will be waiting for me when I get home :)

Very nice of AMD to get the bugs worked out while I was waiting for the card to arrive :D
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
473 (0.25/day)
Location
Fort Sill, OK
Processor Intel 7700K 5.1Ghz (Intel advised me not to OC this CPU)
Motherboard Asus Maximus IX Code
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i Platinum
Memory 48GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 3200 Dual Channel (2x16 & 2x8)
Video Card(s) nVIDIA Titan XP (Overclocks like a champ but stock performance is enough)
Storage Intel 760p 2280 2TB
Display(s) MSI Optix MPG27CQ Black 27" 1ms 144hz
Case Thermaltake View 71
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 1000 Platinum2
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro (not recommded, I am on my second mouse with same defect)
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 1803
Benchmark Scores Yes I am Intel fanboy that is my benchmark score.
So, if your mobo fries... simply reboot and turn compatibility mode on. Seems like it should be on by default.
You simply cannot fry a mainboard when a minor spikes like that. Each PCI-E is able to handle that kind of load. If you fry your mainboard most likely it is not your 480 that caused it.

Original Post: Glad they were able to tweak and address the problem with a software update.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.51/day)
It just hit me. If they could shift the power delivery, so can users. And expand it beyond total 150W/166W. The card has a very beefy VRM segment. And a 6pin which can deliver up to 150W on its own. Meaning this card has an overclocking potential if users can shift the power delivery and stick better cooling on them. Hidden massive potential!
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,732 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
Sweet now if next payday would hurry up and get here I can get me some waterblocks and crank these to 11.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
166 (0.04/day)
Location
Augsburg, Germany
System Name Clevo W650KK1 Laptop | Nokia 7 Plus
Processor i5-8400 | Snapdagon 660
Motherboard Clevo H170 | HMD
Cooling Stock w/ AC MX-2 | Passive
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 | 4GB LPDDR4
Video Card(s) GTX1050Ti uVolted | Adreno 512
Storage 275GB SSD + 500GB SSHD | 64GB int. + 32GB uSD
Display(s) 15.6" 100Hz + LG 34" 75Hz| 6" 18:9 1080p
Case Clevo W650 | Nokia 7 Plus
Power Supply 120W Delta Electronics | 3800mAh Battery
Mouse Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | -
Keyboard Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | GBoard
Software W10 Pro x64 | Android 9.0
Really nice to see good news from AMD. We need good participants in a "GPU Competition" and AMD is doing fine rn. I am waiting for custom RX 480 for my PC. I wanted to see what the 1060 fuss was all about but it seems to limited for future upgrades. Maybe the DirectX 12 Mixed Multi-GPU thing will be glorious, but it is still far from ready and I'm sure even if it becomes a thing, NVIDIA will just disable it just like it has done in the past.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,335 (1.45/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name STEAMBOX | GAMECUBE | EQC (Everyday Quad Core)
Processor i5 4590@3.7Ghz |i7 3770K@4Ghz -|- Athlon 5350@2.52Ghz
Motherboard GA-B85N PHOENIX | Asrock Z77E-ITX | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Stock | Antec Kuhler 620 | Reeven Vanxie
Memory 2x4GB ADATA XPG 1600Mhz | 2x4GB Kingston 1866Mhz -|- 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix@1920Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 480 Nitro | Sapphire RX 480 w/Accelero Mono Plus | HD 8400 @ 720Mhz (IGP)
Storage LiteON 128GB mSATA+3TB Seagate | Seagate 1TBxSamung 64GB SSD (Intel RST) | Kingston v300 240GB
Display(s) Daewoo 49" 1080p | ASUS PA248Q 1920x1200 IPS
Case Corsair 250D | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Acteck Fiji
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 | Silverstone SFX-450 | 200w mini FLEX PSU
Software Windows 10 64bit
So, if your mobo fries... simply reboot and turn compatibility mode on. Seems like it should be on by default.
A single 480 won't fry your motherboard, even with the old driver. The only documented case of a damaged motherboard had multiple cards installed. If, for example, a board has 3 PCIe slots it has to have provisions for delivering 75w to each one, so 225w in total. A single 480 won't draw that much current from the motherboard.

The new driver sets the 12V bias to the 6pin connector, the compatibility mode just puts the power limit to 150w. It's a different fix for folks that still have problems with the 6pin bias fix; likely those with very old motherboards with power delivery systems that can't deal with the load spikes.


It just hit me. If they could shift the power delivery, so can users. And expand it beyond total 150W/166W. The card has a very beefy VRM segment. And a 6pin which can deliver up to 150W on its own. Meaning this card has an overclocking potential if users can shift the power delivery and stick better cooling on them. Hidden massive potential!
The bias has a maximum of .15 according to W1zard. You can't set all the power to come from the 6pin connector and even if you could it's not advisable anyway since each phase can deal 40w. If you switched everything to the 6pin it could only draw 120w at most.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.51/day)
So, all phases can churn out 240W theoretical load and realistic max being 120W on 6pin phases and 75W on PCIe phases. That's still 195W which ain't that bad, giving some headroom. If you can cool it well enough.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,902 (0.75/day)
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
A single 480 won't fry your motherboard, even with the old driver.

The new driver sets the 12V bias to the 6pin connector, the compatibility mode just puts the power limit to 150w. It's a different fix for folks that still have problems (likely those with very old motherboards... we're talking about LGA775, AM2 boards).




The bias has a maximum of .15 according to W1zard. You can't set all the power to come from the 6pin connector and even if you could it's not advisable anyway since each phase can deal 40w. If you switched everything to the 6pin it could only draw 120w at most.
Each phase can do 40A not W and that's with the VRM at 125C. At normal operating temps (80C) you can shove much more current through them.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
1,006 (0.19/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Intel i7-920 @ 4.0GHz LGA1366
Motherboard Intel DX58 Smackover Motherboard
Cooling TRUE 120 with 2x120mm Thermalright FDB-1600 and 8x120mm Zalman/Coolermaster Case Fans
Memory 16GB DDR3-1333 Corsair @ 8-8-8-19
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 FE
Storage Intel 520 240GB + Intel X25-M 80GB + 4TB Seagate/WD Storage
Display(s) 24" Samsung SA350 + 24" BenQ G2410HD + 2x 22" Samsung 2253GW's + Hyundai 19" B91D+
Case Coolermaster CM690
Power Supply Corsair TX750W PSU
Software Windows 8.1
Nice, exactly the response we needed. Glad to see the VRM could handle per-phase load configuration.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,335 (1.45/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name STEAMBOX | GAMECUBE | EQC (Everyday Quad Core)
Processor i5 4590@3.7Ghz |i7 3770K@4Ghz -|- Athlon 5350@2.52Ghz
Motherboard GA-B85N PHOENIX | Asrock Z77E-ITX | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Stock | Antec Kuhler 620 | Reeven Vanxie
Memory 2x4GB ADATA XPG 1600Mhz | 2x4GB Kingston 1866Mhz -|- 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix@1920Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 480 Nitro | Sapphire RX 480 w/Accelero Mono Plus | HD 8400 @ 720Mhz (IGP)
Storage LiteON 128GB mSATA+3TB Seagate | Seagate 1TBxSamung 64GB SSD (Intel RST) | Kingston v300 240GB
Display(s) Daewoo 49" 1080p | ASUS PA248Q 1920x1200 IPS
Case Corsair 250D | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Acteck Fiji
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 | Silverstone SFX-450 | 200w mini FLEX PSU
Software Windows 10 64bit
Each phase can do 40A not W and that's with the VRM at 125C. At normal operating temps (80C) you can shove much more current through them.
Ow, sorry, you're right. I recalled reading about them supplying 40 something... so watts seemed like a safe bet :)
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.51/day)
Each phase can do 40A not W and that's with the VRM at 125C. At normal operating temps (80C) you can shove much more current through them.
40A per phase, that's a... a lot more than 40W. At 12V, that's 480W per phase at 125°C. That can't be right. Tell me I've cocked up my math somewhere...
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
1,006 (0.19/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Intel i7-920 @ 4.0GHz LGA1366
Motherboard Intel DX58 Smackover Motherboard
Cooling TRUE 120 with 2x120mm Thermalright FDB-1600 and 8x120mm Zalman/Coolermaster Case Fans
Memory 16GB DDR3-1333 Corsair @ 8-8-8-19
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 FE
Storage Intel 520 240GB + Intel X25-M 80GB + 4TB Seagate/WD Storage
Display(s) 24" Samsung SA350 + 24" BenQ G2410HD + 2x 22" Samsung 2253GW's + Hyundai 19" B91D+
Case Coolermaster CM690
Power Supply Corsair TX750W PSU
Software Windows 8.1
40A per phase, that's a... a lot more than 40W. At 12V, that's 480W per phase at 125°C. That can't be right. Tell me I've cocked up my math somewhere...
I think that would be 40A per phase on the secondary side, meaning 40A at the core/memory voltage, i.e. <1.5V.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Messages
74 (0.06/day)
It just hit me. If they could shift the power delivery, so can users. And expand it beyond total 150W/166W. The card has a very beefy VRM segment. And a 6pin which can deliver up to 150W on its own. Meaning this card has an overclocking potential if users can shift the power delivery and stick better cooling on them. Hidden massive potential!
Here you go:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1604979/a-temporary-fix-for-the-excess-pci-e-slot-power-draw-for-the-reference-rx-480-cards/110#post_25324219

It increases the TDP to 250W~ by shifting the power targets, so -50% actually becomes the current/stock (0%) default of 110W and the +50% is now 250W. I believe these values are for the GPU/vCore itself and not the entire card. So you can imagine the added headroom.

An added bonus is that it also increases the limit on the memory so the maximum is 2500 MHz instead of 2250.

As always with mods like these: use at your own risk. Things can go kaboom if you don't know what you're doing.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.51/day)
I think that would be 40A per phase on the secondary side, meaning 40A at the core/memory voltage, i.e. <1.5V.
That would make more sense, 40A*1.5V is 60W. If that's a 125°C rating, at lower temperatures we can still be talking around 80-100W. That's still huge.

@Shamalamadingdong
Yeah, I'm aware of the risks, but that applies to every overclock. Still, the headroom can be a lot higher than around 150W as initially thought. If user has PSU powerful enough to feed 6pin, VRM is there to deliver it if needed. Far beyond the original specs. Meaning AIB's only have to slam better cooling on reference design. They don't even have to redesign PCB and components on it to gain headroom.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,825 (1.92/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer / Portable?
Processor i7 8700K 5.0ghz (24/7) / 2x Intel Xeon X5670 / Intel i7 7700HQ
Motherboard Asus Z370 Prime-A / Dell Dual Socket (R710) / HP Omen Stock
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop in Push Pull Config. / Dell Stock / HP Stock
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / 1333mhz DDR3 96gb 12 x 8gb / 12gb DDR4 3 x 4gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector) / RX 580
Storage Samsung 512gb SSD RAID 0 and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5 / NVME 240gb SSD and 1tb HDD
Display(s) Acer XG270HU 1440p 144hz Freesync, Acer B286HK 4K UHD Monitor / 1080p 60hz Freesync display
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D / Dell Poweredge R710 Rack Mount Case / HP Omen 17
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows Server 2008 R2 / Windows 10 Home
So its resolved then? Ok, guess we can knock that problem off the list...

Now then, we just need the aftermarket variants to allow better overclocking or better voltage control on the reference (I assume we will still get that at some point).
 
Top