• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Allegedly 40% Faster than 5950X in CPU-Z Bench Multi-Threaded

btarunr

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,770 (7.42/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Specs
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
The upcoming AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-core/32-thread processor is allegedly over 40% faster than its predecessor, the 5950X, at the CPU-Z Bench multi-threaded test, according to a leaked benchmark screenshot scored by harukaze5719, and tabulated by Wccftech. The 7950X is shown with a score of 16809 points, which puts it 41 percent faster than the 5950X, and 43% faster than the i9-12900K. It's also shown to be behind the leaked benchmarks of the i9-13900K by a whisker—with the upcoming Intel chip being 0.5% faster.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Nanochip said:
The 13700k is looking powerful. Faster than the mighty 5950x.
Click to expand...
I mean wouldn't you expect a new sub high end cpu to beat a 2 years old high end cpu?
 
Hi,
I'd rather have real cores and threads than thermal defective e cores any day.
 
7950x with 200MB L3 Cache please! :love:
 
cellar door said:
All of a sudden I have the urge to sell my 5800X...
Click to expand...
Hi,
Well for that board yeah 5800x3d is the one to have :cool:

Another build yeah I'm interested to 7k series but likely a lappy in my near future.
 
Nanochip said:
The Ryzen-7 7700x doesn’t beat the 5950x in multicore what are you talking about ?
Click to expand...
Sub high end would be 7900x in my mind

ThrashZone said:
Hi,
I'd rather have real cores and threads than thermal defective e cores any day.
Click to expand...
Yeah well, you might dislike them but if you buy a high core count cpu, its probably for MT performance. And smaller cores WILL give you more MT performance while being more power efficient AND area efficient
 
Ellertis said:
Sub high end would be 7900x in my mind
Click to expand...
That’s going to be a killer part for the price (if amd prices it properly), The 7900x.

Even still, intel is giving i7 users ($400-450) more performance than the current $500+ i9 12900k. That’s a win for consumers.
 
Nanochip said:
That’s going to be a killer part for the price (if amd prices it properly), The 7900x.

Even still, intel is giving i7 users ($400-450) more performance than the current $500+ i9 12900k. That’s a win for consumers.
Click to expand...
Back and forth punches, now that`s a real competition
 
Ellertis said:
Sub high end would be 7900x in my mind


Yeah well, you might dislike them but if you buy a high core count cpu, its probably for MT performance. And smaller cores WILL give you more MT performance while being more power efficient AND area efficient
Click to expand...
Hi,
I already have high core/ thread count cpu's
All my builds also have a feature called "By core usage" which is as efficient as I need
And all core oc'ing all 28/ 20/ 12 threads are within 8c of each other
Try that with these e core cpu's :laugh:
 
Ellertis said:
Back and forth punches, now that`s a real competition
Click to expand...
I’m loving the competition I’m glad amd is strong…putting serious pressure on intel. Intel can’t just release quad core after quad core and think that’s okay.

Apple left, amd has been steadily gaining market share, AMD’s platform longevity on am4 was good for many consumers. AMD’s chiplet strategy coupled with the key innovation to realize and to productize l3 cache in the 3rd dimension, will be a boon for them. Good that they are optimizing their designs.

I’m interested to see what core designs Intel brings to market in the disaggregated era…redwood cove, lion cove, crestmont skymont, darkmont. As intel shrinks it’s nodes, I’m wondering how many cores it’ll offer for mainstream desktop?
 
They're showing the 7950x with a ~40% uplift over zen3 5950x, but the 7700x is only doing ~20% over the 5800x, everything still to be seen basically
 
trsttte said:
They're showing the 7950x with a ~40% uplift over zen3 5950x, but the 7700x is only doing ~20% over the 5800x, everything still to be seen basically
Click to expand...
power, imo. they might keep same power levels for ryzen 7, but R9 is probably getting a bigger power budget. That`s maybe why

ThrashZone said:
Hi,
I already have high core/ thread count cpu's
All my builds also have a feature called "By core usage" which is as efficient as I need
And all core oc'ing all 28/ 20/ 12 threads are within 8c of each other
Try that with these e core cpu's :laugh:
Click to expand...
I`m not getting you. What were you trying to tell about your builds?
 
Daven said:
The 7950x is looking powerful. Faster than the mighty 5950x.
Click to expand...
But more expensive. The 13700k is very likely to be in the $400 range, the 5950x was once $800. A part that costs half as much (at starting msrp) will be faster. That’s competition at play. Finally, The 7950x is going to be at least $700 probably more. But it will be fast for sure gotta give amd kudos for that.
 
Low quality post by Leshy
trsttte said:
They're showing the 7950x with a ~40% uplift over zen3 5950x, but the 7700x is only doing ~20% over the 5800x, everything still to be seen basically
Click to expand...

Also 20% uplift in the single-core. very clever showing you the multi when PBO is locked and 5950X is starved for power.

I would wait until the meteor lake 8+32, 48 thread or something. +50% next year.
 
ppn said:
Also 20% uplift in the single-core. very clever showing you the multi when PBO is locked and 5950X is starved for power.

I would wait until the meteor lake 8+32, 48 thread or something. +50% next year.
Click to expand...
Well AMD also will use big.little in zen5 so that`s all will be an interesting confrontation
 
Is that score not what one would expect from DDR5 6000Mhz alone - can any 12xxx owners confirm the difference between e.g. 3000 and 5000MHz in cpu-z
 
Nanochip said:
That’s going to be a killer part for the price (if amd prices it properly), The 7900x.

Even still, intel is giving i7 users ($400-450) more performance than the current $500+ i9 12900k. That’s a win for consumers.
Click to expand...
It isn't a win by that standard. The i9 has NEVER made any sense lol. You were paying several hundred dollars for 4 extra E cores. In the past you didn't even get anything for the i9 money. i7 is the real top chip. I compare i7 versus new i5, that's where the value lies or not.
 
God I love CPU wars. I still remember the late 90s.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top