• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD TRX40 Chipset Not Compatible with 1st and 2nd Gen Threadrippers

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,700 (8.51/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD is giving finishing touches to its 3rd generation Ryzen Threadripper HEDT processor lineup, and the first wave of these chips, starting with a 24-core model, will launch alongside the AMD TRX40 chipset. It turns out that the chipset won't be compatible with 1st and 2nd generation Ryzen Threadripper processors. The upcoming 3rd generation Threadripper chips won't be backwards-compatible with the AMD X399 chipset, either. We've been hearing from reliable sources rumors of this segmentation from AMD for a few days now, and tech journalist ReHWolution just tweeted its confirmation having obtained info on upcoming motherboards from a leading brand.

The underlying reason between this restriction remains a mystery. We know that the EPYC "Rome" MCM is pin-compatible with first-generation EPYC "Naples" chips due to the fact that the newer chips are drop-in compatible with older servers via a BIOS update. The TR4 socket, too, is nearly identical to SP3r2, but for four out of eight memory channels being blanked out. It remains to be seen if for TRX40 motherboards, AMD re-purposed these unused pins for something else, such as additional PCIe connectivity or more electrical pins. We'll find out in November, when AMD is expected to launch these chips.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
44 (0.06/day)
I was hoping these rumors would turn out to be false. I would love to upgrade my 1950x and drop it into my x399 Zenith Extreme. It was the most I ever paid for a motherboard.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,626 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Well that's a damn shame. Seems like AMD is taking some cues from Intel here, more or less. I was really hoping to snag a 3rd-gen TR as an upgrade for the 1920X in my partner's workstation some time down the line. If that also requires a $300 motherboard swap, that suddenly becomes a lot less enticing.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,505 (1.66/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
This is interesting I thought that with Intel's announcement that X299 boards will support their new Cascade Lake CPUs that AMD would not do this but I think I might know why (just guessing). The TR40 and the next chips will all be PCI_E 4.0. This could mean unfortunately that the TR40 boards may be more expensive across the stack than X399 from every vendor.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2017
Messages
118 (0.12/day)
I was hoping these rumors would turn out to be false. I would love to upgrade my 1950x and drop it into my x399 Zenith Extreme. It was the most I ever paid for a motherboard.
You still have zen +

Well that's a damn shame. Seems like AMD is taking some cues from Intel here, more or less. I was really hoping to snag a 3rd-gen TR as an upgrade for the 1920X in my partner's workstation some time down the line. If that also requires a $300 motherboard swap, that suddenly becomes a lot less enticing.
AMD never ever promised HEDT longevity , only MA4
 

aktpu

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
25 (0.03/day)
Perhaps AMD is worried about power delivery, 16 cores was king for first gen but I doubt that they do less than 24 cores now so maybe they are playing it safe? Also, is this AMD-thing or a Asrock-thing?
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,277 (0.58/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
honestly, this is pretty sad stuff from AMD, even IF there is a good reason for this it would be nice if they would at least make a 3rd gen Threadripper chip specifically for X399 so those adopters can at least upgrade to that.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,638 (1.09/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
@JohnWal
See? Told ya it wont be.

At the same time. Only 2 gen support for HEDT on AMD is bad. Man even X370 can use RyZen 3xxx. I was hoping to put in quote for updating the TR builds in lab as well as helping other labs to upgrade their TR based system. The lab has one 1950X build, 3 2950X builds and 1 2990WX builds. Now that upgrade path is gone. Bummer for sure. I mean the 2990WX runs on Linux and is only used for comparative genomic analysis, NUMA issue is not too bad for that one.

Shame AMD, shame. I had higher hope for you. :( :(

Perhaps AMD is worried about power delivery, 16 cores was king for first gen but I doubt that they do less than 24 cores now so maybe they are playing it safe? Also, is this AMD-thing or a Asrock-thing?
Zen+ based TR 2xxx series had 24 and 32 cores, can be overclocked over 4GHz. Power delievery is a non issue for the X399 boards released last year.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
611 (1.09/day)
Location
London, UK
There we go, amd starting to behave like intel.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
299 (1.08/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Damn. We have a bunch of x399 boards that would appreciate some Zen2 love.

Still, I can't complain; Even if you add the cost of those X399 boards, 1950x + new board ran circles around the Intel CPU-only costs for those nodes added to the farm, both in actual performance and also in performance/$
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,626 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD never ever promised HEDT longevity , only MA4
I know - TR4 was always an off-roadmap project. But it's still disappointing.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,638 (1.09/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Damn. We have a bunch of x399 boards that would appreciate some Zen2 love.

Still, I can't complain; Even if you add the cost of those X399 boards, 1950x + new board ran circles around the Intel CPU-only costs for those nodes added to the farm, both in actual performance and also in performance/$
If the workloads utilize any form of AVX512, Intel nodes runs circles around TR system with same core config. Not sure what field you work in. In my area we are starting to see wide spread adoption of AVX512 in codes which gives AVX512 capable Intel system a huge boost in performance. The same amount of microbiome data pushed through using the same pipeline would finish almost 30% faster on Intel system comparing to the AMD TR system with just AVX2.

Example of a DNA sequence alignment
133793


A lot of bioinformatics tools benefit a huge amount from implementation of AVX512. See this paper over here actually discussing the benefit of AVX512 in research



I wish AMD will have AVX512 support on their Zen arc soon.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,835 (1.93/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
If the workloads utilize any form of AVX512, Intel nodes runs circles around TR system with same core config. Not sure what field you work in. In my area we are starting to see wide spread adoption of AVX512 in codes which gives AVX512 capable Intel system a huge boost in performance. The same amount of microbiome data pushed through using the same pipeline would finish almost 30% faster on Intel system comparing to the AMD TR system with just AVX2.

Example of a DNA sequence alignment
View attachment 133793

A lot of bioinformatics tools benefit a huge amount from implementation of AVX512. See this paper over here actually discussing the benefit of AVX512 in research



I wish AMD will have AVX512 support on their Zen arc soon.
Fair enough and important to note , just as important though is the fact that not everyone is doing the same things as you.
Bioinformatics is a niche of computer use not the sole use or AMD would be in trouble.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,732 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Something doesn't seem right: Epyc CPUs will re-utilize the same socked but TR gen 3 won't???

Had Epyc Rome force a change in socket, one would expect TR gen 3 to do the same, but since it didn't ... something doesn't add up here!
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,638 (1.09/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Fair enough and important to note , just as important though is the fact that not everyone is doing the same things as you.
Bioinformatics is a niche of computer use not the sole use or AMD would be in trouble.
I would not say it is niche in HPC. At my university more than half of the nodes are saturated with varies form of bioinformatics job: biomedical imaging data analysis and intergration; DNA/RNA/Protein sequencing; Protein modeling; Population genetics; neural network based multiomics cancer research.

It is HEDT we are talking about here. With its higher core count and good pricing AMD has seen some good adoption in research labs. What I was saying is the now widely used AVX512 and soon-to-be implemented Deep Learning Boost will slowly claw back the marketshare and mindshare from Threadripper again.

As a matter of fact one of my friend at Oregon State University working for HPC maintenance is already seeing some "buyer's remorse" Oregon State spent a crap ton of money on EPYC processors for bioinformatics applications.

Mainstream desktop nobody cares about AVX512 that much. That I agree RyZen 3xxx is killing it.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
274 (0.32/day)
We already knew that AMD wants to milk ever penny from enthusiasts since they announced the R9 series and disable SMT for lowerend models.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
60 (0.23/day)
Location
Germany
System Name New Horyzen
Processor Ryzen 7 1700X
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4
Cooling Noctua U-12S
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengance LPX 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5700XT
Storage A lot
Case Modded Corsair Carbide 300R
Audio Device(s) ESI Maya44 eX, Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 2nd, Samson Meteor, Mixer and Headphone Amp
Power Supply SeaSonic M12II 750W
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard HyperX Alloy & Logitech G13
Software All of it
Looking back at the "oh, whoops" many mainboard makers had when 2nd Gen TR happened made AMD proceed with caution.
IIRC Asus had a VRM cooling kit for one of their boards, MSI launched some updated ones.

Putting out new specifications is a safe route. Mobo makers will have proper power delivery, buyers will not have burning mobos.

To all the "they killed muh X399"-criers: Where were you when Intel launched a new Socket and chipset nearly every generation?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
415 (0.52/day)
I really don't think they're doing it as a money grab. It's very likely an actual true technical limitation issue that would cost more to do and quality assurance issue.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2019
Messages
90 (0.35/day)
Lets wait and see. Could you imagine if AMD repeats the intel mistake, and artificially makes the boards incompatible. Aka, skylake/coffeelake refresh.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
334 (0.91/day)
Location
PL, Krk (JPN, Tokyo)
System Name Nilin (Main)
Processor Ryzen 5 2600 @4Ghz 1.275V
Motherboard Asus Rog Crosshair VIII Hero Wifi
Cooling EK Custom Water Loop
Memory G. Skill Flare X 2x8gb 3200 Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) Msi GTX 1080 TI FE (EK Waterblock)
Storage Samsung Evo 960 250gb (System), Samsung Evo 860 500gb (Games), Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 1Tb (Games)
Display(s) LG 27" UHD IPS, LG24" FHD IPS
Case InWin 303 (+ 7x Fractal Prisma 120mm)
Power Supply Tt Toughpower Grand RGB 850W
Mouse Tt eSPORTS Saphira
Keyboard Logitech Pro Series
Perfect time to get a 1950X with a X399 board for cheapo ;) already have my eye on a used threadripper, just waiting for boards to get cheaper.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,570 (4.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Something doesn't seem right: Epyc CPUs will re-utilize the same socked but TR gen 3 won't???

Had Epyc Rome force a change in socket, one would expect TR gen 3 to do the same, but since it didn't ... something doesn't add up here!
Until we hear this officially from AMD I am unsure what to believe. If TRX40 isn't compatible with Zen 1 and Zen 1+ that wouldn't be that big of a deal, there is little reason to buy these boards and pair them with the older TRs but if you are required to have TRX40 for Zen 2 that would be strange indeed. Again, gotta have AMD's official statement.

Fair enough and important to note , just as important though is the fact that not everyone is doing the same things as you.
Bioinformatics is a niche of computer use not the sole use or AMD would be in trouble.
The performance you get is unrelated to the field, there is no such thing as a AMD, Nivida or Intel having an advantage in a niche field. Computation is computation, if something scales well with vectorization or multithreading it should do so on any CPU, of course the limiting factor becomes the hardware.

And with that been said Zen 2 now has double the FP throughput so 24 cores should nicely match Intel's top of the line 18 core part even with AVX 512.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,505 (1.66/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Perhaps AMD is worried about power delivery, 16 cores was king for first gen but I doubt that they do less than 24 cores now so maybe they are playing it safe? Also, is this AMD-thing or a Asrock-thing?
Perfect time to get a 1950X with a X399 board for cheapo ;) already have my eye on a used threadripper, just waiting for boards to get cheaper.
Look for the As rock X399 Phantom Gaming 6 the MSRP is $249.99 US
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,795 (0.90/day)
I have to say I disagree with most people in this thread about the criticism of AMD breaking backwards compatibility. While everyone would love to have hardware with endless upgradability, having this only would become useful after ~4-5 years when there is a significant upgrade, but then everything embedded on the motherboard would be outdated. If we were to have real compatibility across several generations we would need to make motherboards more simple, modular and barebone like back in the 286/386/486 days, where motherboards were basically more or less just expansion ports. This is an idea that I like, at least in theory.

We have to remember that this platform is meant for workstations, which makes reliability the most important trait. Motherboard makers are already barely maintaining support for any motherboard beyond 2 years, and they certainly don't test each model with enough hardware before shipping a BIOS update. As we've seen with AM4, the compatibility with older hardware is questionable at best. And while AMD motherboards are getting the same premium prices as some "premium" Intel boards, certain makers still fail to deliver the same quality (*ahem* MSI, Gigabyte…). If anything AMD should focus their energy on two things; 1) Firmware testing ahead of product launch 2) Put pressure on motherboard makers to do their best when making the BIOSes. A few hiccups after a product launch is excusable, repeated problems three months later is a deal breaker for workstation use.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,443 (0.93/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
If the workloads utilize any form of AVX512, Intel nodes runs circles around TR system with same core config. Not sure what field you work in. In my area we are starting to see wide spread adoption of AVX512 in codes which gives AVX512 capable Intel system a huge boost in performance. The same amount of microbiome data pushed through using the same pipeline would finish almost 30% faster on Intel system comparing to the AMD TR system with just AVX2.

Example of a DNA sequence alignment
View attachment 133793

A lot of bioinformatics tools benefit a huge amount from implementation of AVX512. See this paper over here actually discussing the benefit of AVX512 in research



I wish AMD will have AVX512 support on their Zen arc soon.
I am curious, is that 30% faster performance than TR despite the AVX clocks / off-set?
Or is that a Xeon only thing?
 
Top