• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Assassin's Creed III GPU and CPU bench

Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.56/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
Some CPU tests done on AC III

ac3 proz483.png


source: http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/assassins-creed-iii-test-gpu.html

Some GPU tests done on AC III

Assassins-Creed-3-Test-GPU-Benchmarks.png


source: http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Assas...ts/Assassins-Creed-3-Test-Benchmarks-1036472/
 
wow, amazing..
it can be seen from the horizontal line graph, HD6970 performance is very close enough (on par) with HD7970GE and shockingly GTX560Ti performance is better than HD7970.. :wtf:

no wonder, it is twimtbp games, so yeah..
 
Unoptimized for AMD. :P

And how did all the bulldozers get faster than the Phenom 2's?
 
Unoptimized for AMD. :P

And how did all the bulldozers get faster than the Phenom 2's?

It seems to be one of the few latest games that favor Nvidia. AMD CPUs perform indeed very bad according to the test.
 
no piledriver or ivybridge cpus?
 
What the hell... i hope AMD rolls out some new video drivers for this...
 
height of an unoptimized game
 
Runs great maxed out on mine but I get a LOT of tearing during cutscenes. I'll try forcing vsync when I have time to play more.
 
so funny

Game is definitely not optimized!

I rage when I saw the fps drop to the mid 30's
when I entered Boston.

Gpu usage went from 95+% to 20%-50% and spiked like crazy...

My specs:
i7-980x@ 4.3 GHz
Corsair Vengenence 12GB DDR3
ASUS P6X58D Premium
Ultra X4 1200W PSU
EVGA GeForce GTX690 4096MB GDDR5 512bit x2 ( Quad Sli Enabled)

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/124076-13-assassin-creed

98Vej.png

4PGEI.png
 
Last edited:
So severely unoptimised for AMD, and also no Piledriver specs among other processors...
Is this going to be as mad on the gpu as hitman currently is?
 
poorly optimized game :D
Z7DQo.png

Lmao
1KFIK.png
 
interesting


so my i3 2100 with gf460 will bet my fx8120 with 6850CF? I will try with i3 later, so far on fx8120 with 6850CF I can not play all maxed out, so I set anti to high, environment to high, shadow to high, everything else to max. 1980, avg FPS 35, low FPS 25, High FPS 60. most the time it is at 60 FPS, but can get low FPS sometimes.
 
It's so bad for AMD CPU's that it kinda smells of what icc would do. :shadedshu
 
oh wow, my old dual core i3 2100 (and my sister;s i5 760) is till doing just fine. Ive read that the game is heavy on one single core only tho but ive seen some that it uses all threads even HT ones on the i3s
 
At first I thought I there wasn't any amd gpu's because I read to the 560ti...
 
So for Assassins Creed 3 is more important the processor , not the video card ?
I guess that my I3 530 will do just fine .
 
I did some test

so my i3 2100 with gf460 will bet my fx8120 with 6850CF? I will try with i3 later, so far on fx8120 with 6850CF I can not play all maxed out, so I set anti to high, environment to high, shadow to high, everything else to max. 1980, avg FPS 35, low FPS 25, High FPS 60. most the time it is at 60 FPS, but can get low FPS sometimes.

amd 8120 turbo off, no OC, 6850 CF, as far seeing from usage and temps, the cpu and gpu are not full loaded, cpu at 47c, gpu at 67c, where crysis 2 and bf3 can make them a lot hotter, i think the game is not yet perfect for CF.


shadow high, environment high, anti normal, everything else max. 1080.
tested fps with fraps, tested in in Boston

Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
249695 5397541 25 64 46.261
 
Last edited:
If it is in the nvidia's ''The Way It's Meant to Be Played'' program it is usual ,
iirc nvidia workers making optimization to games for nvidia but it does not mean they do best for everybody ; metro 2033 loads physicx while i have ati card without asking to me ,i would not load that crap and think people with very low performance and/or problem because they are not hw literacy.
BTW Ubisoft is a company removed direct x 10.1 support from Ac because it was in twimtbp probram back in the day http://www.tgdaily.com/games/37326-ubisoft-caught-in-a-little-assassin’s-creed-scandal

i think the game is not yet perfect for CF.
 
That is somewhat fake. I tried it on my pc at resolution 1280x1024 with my 6770 HD to make a review
on my website with all high and it ran like 20FPS when inside cities, but when in the jungle it ran smoothly.
I have the specs listed so you can see for yourself.
You can look the screenshots here: http://www.anothergames.com/reviews/ac
 
they benched it at 1080p so normally it would be more taxing than 1280 x 1024 (and since 1280 x 1024, it has black borders/cropped so you are effectively running it at 1280 x 720)
 
Back
Top