- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
- Messages
- 5,510 (2.67/day)
- Location
- California
System Name | His & Hers |
---|---|
Processor | R7 5800X/ R9 5950X Stock |
Motherboard | X570 Aorus Master/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero |
Cooling | Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum |
Memory | 32 GB 4x8GB 4000CL15 Trident Z Royal/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk |
Video Card(s) | Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090 |
Storage | lots of SSD. |
Display(s) | LG G2 65/LG C1 48/ LG 27GP850/ MSI 27 inch VA panel 1440p165hz |
Case | 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X |
Audio Device(s) | Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B |
Power Supply | Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero. |
Keyboard | Corsair K95 RGB Platinum/ Logitech G Pro |
Your expectations must have been really low then. I remember posting a few months ago that based on the paper specs it might barely match the original 2080 and most people were like man it better be a lot faster than that.
Stock for stock it's only 18% faster than the 3060 while having 4 gigs less RAM and an inferior memory bus
I mean heck it's only 27% faster than a 2070 from 2018...... (That's embarrassing)
Overall 1080p test suite was stock vs stock 81.3 FPS (3060) vs 96FPS (4060) which is 18%. The summary of the review noted 20% but that was because this Asus model is 2% faster than stock
At the end of the day consumers should at a min expect a current generation card to clearly beat the previous generation card one tier above it so the 3060ti and honestly even that should be a low expectation.
Clearly this card can't even clear that low bar.