• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Prime OC 16 GB

I'm finding DLSS4 Transformer so good that you can actually run it at 1080p balanced on the 5060Ti and it still looks really good to me (as a DLSS hater before DLSS4 Transformer).

I'm not saying your settings are wrong because they're personal preference, but I find input lag far more bearable with a base framerate of >50fps. You seem to be running in the 35-40fps base framerate which felt too sluggish to me.

Path tracing in CP2077 looks awesome but I've decided to continue my Phantom Liberty playthrough on the other machine (9070XT, 1440p240) because raytraced reflections only is by far the most noticeable RT effect and the Radeon will do that at 120Hz realtime which makes the game feel so much nicer. I don't know what it is about CP2077's path tracing but the realtime shadowing and occlusion results in far too much shadow-crawl and "boiling" surfaces. It's a nice tech demo but I genuinely think I prefer the look of the game with old-school shadowmaps. Even if the lighting is less accurate and realistic, it's far less distracting.

I honestly dont feel any input lag with these settings. I had a rtx 4070 before which had better raster performance, so in theory less input lag, but i cant feel any difference between the two of them. And i'm usually easily bothered by input lag. Or perhaps i'm just getting old and my brain reactivity is playing tricks on me :P
 
I honestly dont feel any input lag with these settings. I had a rtx 4070 before which had better raster performance, so in theory less input lag, but i cant feel any difference between the two of them. And i'm usually easily bothered by input lag. Or perhaps i'm just getting old and my brain reactivity is playing tricks on me :p
You're not wrong. "The customer is always right, in matters of taste". I dislike the added sluggishness, but my preference for DLSS4 Balanced to produce lower latency or without raytraced lighting altogether is purely subjective.

I used to think DLSS was utter garbage - no better than purely-software upscalers - but DLSS4 Transformer is so good that I feel compelled to suggest you try DLSS Balanced or DLSS Performance, even at 1080p
 
Why is the PCI 5.0 x8 a negative?
You have shown that it doesn't affect performance, infact niether did PCI 4.0 x8 and only 4% loss on PCI 3.0x8.

If the card can't make use of the extra 8 lanes, it makes no sense to make it a negative.

Doesn't matter if your pc supports it, it perfomance like it does, like you won't know if it ddr4 or ddr5 system memory, you won't feel if it's pci e 4.0 or 5.0 not even when comparing it

A gtx 1080 ti (pci e 3.,0) out performans a rtx 3060 12gb (pci e 4.0) evene when it's 11 vs 12gb and pci e 3 vs 4

Even with the low bus speed it's faster than a rtx 3070 ti 256 bit vs half of it on a 5060 ti 16 gb

mostly to raise awareness, and 4% is not nothing


fixed

The 4% you can gain if you can afford higher tier cpu and high perfomance memory

(Also depends on how you adjust a game compared to other people)

like 6400mhz 30 or 6000 mhz cl26 (g skill) and a 9800x3d over a ryzen 7600 and 6000mhz cl32

Asus Prime 5060Ti 16GB

£365,82 on a danish site called komplett and it's the oc version
 
£365,82 on a danish site called komplett and it's the oc version
I'm not sure where you're getting those numbers from. I'm familiar with Komplett but they don't ship to the UK since Brexit. They're currently listing it for 4400 Danish Krone.

kr.4400 in Denmark converts to £500. If it was selling for the kr.3200 you're suggesting then it was likely a listing error.
 
Back
Top