spencer22l
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2009
- Messages
- 262 (0.05/day)
System Name | my comp~ |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 3.6Ghz |
Motherboard | Asus P5K |
Cooling | OCZ Vendetta 2 |
Memory | Kingston HyperX 1GB x 2 5-5-5-15 2.2v |
Video Card(s) | MSI 4830 512MB OC @ 735/1140 |
Storage | Samsung 320GB (7200/16M) |
Display(s) | 21.6" Samsung Syncmaster 2253LW |
Case | GMC H-70 |
Power Supply | 430w atx power |
Software | Windows XP Pro SP 3 |
Benchmark Scores | 3D Mark06 - 13487 Super Pi - 14.078s |
This is a real noobie question about Intel Burn Test but I'm curious.
Everyone obviously use 1) Maximum RAM for IBT right??
I was wondering if it matters to test it using minimum when you are looking for
lower stable voltage for CPU core v.
Say my RAM clock, timming and voltages are all in stock setting which is 100% stable
even when I OC my cpu. When I do this I tend to give enough core v, then lower it little by
little. In case like these, when RAM's stability doesn't matter, it's alright to test with Minimum
RAM right? Because this is quicker than Maximum.
Everyone obviously use 1) Maximum RAM for IBT right??
I was wondering if it matters to test it using minimum when you are looking for
lower stable voltage for CPU core v.
Say my RAM clock, timming and voltages are all in stock setting which is 100% stable
even when I OC my cpu. When I do this I tend to give enough core v, then lower it little by
little. In case like these, when RAM's stability doesn't matter, it's alright to test with Minimum
RAM right? Because this is quicker than Maximum.