Wile E
Power User
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2006
- Messages
- 24,318 (3.58/day)
System Name | The ClusterF**k |
---|---|
Processor | 980X @ 4Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12 |
Cooling | MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360 |
Memory | 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T |
Video Card(s) | Evga GTX 580 |
Storage | Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB |
Display(s) | HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS |
Case | Technofront Bench Station |
Audio Device(s) | Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750 |
Power Supply | ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W |
Software | Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4 |
The 27.5" would look worse than the 24". It's the same res, spread out over a larger area, leading to a higher pixel pitch. It would look much more grainy compared to the 24". Bigger != better unless the resolution or the view distance goes up as well.
And 2ms panels are the 5ms panels. They just use more overdrive and fudge the ratings a little on the 2ms ones. You would never see a difference, as long as both panels are from quality manufacturers. It's just a marketing gimmick.
And it used to be Tn-Film was the best for gaming because it's response was leagues ahead of M/PVA or IPS. That's not really the case anymore. The later gen M/PVA and IPS panels respond much faster than before, and most don't have the ghosting issues of the past.
And 2ms panels are the 5ms panels. They just use more overdrive and fudge the ratings a little on the 2ms ones. You would never see a difference, as long as both panels are from quality manufacturers. It's just a marketing gimmick.
And it used to be Tn-Film was the best for gaming because it's response was leagues ahead of M/PVA or IPS. That's not really the case anymore. The later gen M/PVA and IPS panels respond much faster than before, and most don't have the ghosting issues of the past.