• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Blender 3.3.0 Benchmark

SchumannFrequency

SchumannFrequency

Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
1,023 (0.98/day)
sJIDQeg.png


Software: ROSA Fresh Desktop 12.4 -- LXQt -- Nvidia proprietary driver -- XFS as root
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL35 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

I had just done some heavy multi-core benchmarks before doing this test, so the PC was fairly warm and did not reach its maximum potential in the test anyway.
Think of it as a result that indicates the absolute minimum values this CPU achieves in the test.

What strikes me is that the Ryzen 7600X, the only AMD competitor to the Intel 12600KF currently, does not perform as well in this test despite being a more expensive CPU:
www.thefpsreview.com

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X CPU Review - Page 5 of 9

AMD's new Zen 4 based Ryzen 5 7600X CPU is here, and we have all the benchmarks, synthetic, rendering, and gaming with a 10 CPU comparison.
www.thefpsreview.com www.thefpsreview.com

You can take the test on this page. https://opendata.blender.org/
When you post, please include your specific hardware and software.
 
1704034513424.png

gpu:
1704034843667.png



System specs on perfil
 
If I do this test when the CPU is less hot it scores slightly higher.

Tbqly1H.png


I also tested the performance of the Nvidia GTX 650 1GB and it scores more than 4 times lower than the Intel 12600KF.

A GPU is not necessarily faster than a CPU for Blender. It is probably only from the moment a GPU has 7.5 TFLOPS FP32 (float) processing power that it is going to be faster than any CPU.
 
System as per signature
Windows 11 Pro 23H2 22635.2915

blender3.3 CPU - 3.1.24.jpg
 
7950X / 8152MT/s CL32 / Win11
1704239136422.png


3090 / 7950X / 8152MT/s CL32 / Win11
1704239149134.png
 
Screenshot from 2024-01-08 21-15-09.png


Software: Clear Linux -- GNOME -- Wayland -- nouveau GPU driver -- F2FS as root
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL35 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
 
xMOdqmx.png


Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, KDE Plasma, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system

On average, Calculate Linux seems to outperform most Linux systems in this Blender test. The differences are rather subtle.
Maybe it's just because I've slightly adjusted my RAM frequency and timings that it's a little faster now.

I now outperform the more expensive R5 7600X quite strongly in each of the three tests, when you compare it to these results:
www.thefpsreview.com

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X CPU Review - Page 5 of 9

AMD's new Zen 4 based Ryzen 5 7600X CPU is here, and we have all the benchmarks, synthetic, rendering, and gaming with a 10 CPU comparison.
www.thefpsreview.com www.thefpsreview.com
 
1712928601671.png


Seems legit. :/
 
Nevermind I see it

1712991927670.png


I guess there's some difference. Is it enough to matter? We'll see.
 
Last edited:
7900x

Blender_330.png
 
blender bench 5-5-24.jpg
 
CPU
Capture d'écran 2024-05-19 031153.png


GPU
Capture d'écran 2024-05-19 031444.png
 
Blender 330.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ikkyusan said:
I've bench again in 2024, with RAM tuning by DDR5-5400 CL34-39-39-78 & tREFI = 65535
(In previous bench: DDR5-5200 CL40-40-40-80 & tREFI = Auto)

Now get over 300 points

https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/88dcf13e-b396-47e0-8f5e-79b6430e4970/
View attachment 348009
Click to expand...

Suppose you used RAM speed >8000 MHz, your result would probably also increase by a few percent.

There is another Blender thread that I made and I am curious whether you can achieve a better result here than my Intel 12600KF under Linux.
www.techpowerup.com

Blender 4.0.1 BMW27 demo test

Render time: 119.2 seconds This test is famous in part because Intel or AMD have frequently used the test to demonstrate the advances of their latest-generation CPUs. Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence...
www.techpowerup.com www.techpowerup.com
 
GPU

blender gpu 5-26-24.jpg
 
uUTDhkw.png


Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, PeKWM, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system

monster: 181.678 samples per minute
junkshop: 94.124 samples per minute
classroom: 71.878 samples per minute

I haven't tuned all the BIOS settings for maximum performance yet.
 
x4iNTZN.png


Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Artix Linux, LXQt, Mesa open-source driver, F2FS file system

monster: 184.915 samples per minute
junkshop: 100.135 samples per minute
classroom: 73.251 samples per minute
 
I did few weeks ago. Took from online submitted result.

1720436362299.png



samples_per_minute: 237.54118723269517,
samples_per_minute: 159.8607014634951,
samples_per_minute: 116.26322483003287,

And GPU.


1720436423467.png


  • samples_per_minute: 2123.5943215660523
  • samples_per_minute: 1165.0576138559823
  • samples_per_minute: 996.0193849059312
 
Running W11 22H2, CPU@stock with E cores disabled and GPU non-OC version@stock speeds with 546.17WHQL:
bench 4.1.0_W11 - i7-12700KF@5.2 and RTX 4090-555.99WHQL.jpg


Running W11 23H2, CPU@5.2 with HT off + E cores off and GPU non-OC version@stock speeds with 555.99WHQL:
bench 3.3.0_W11 - i7-12700KF@stock and RTX 4090-546.17WHQL.jpg


Running W10 22H2, CPU@5.2 with HT off + E cores off and GPU non-OC version@stock speeds with 556.12WHQL:
bench 4.1.0_W10 - i7-12700KF@5.2 and RTX 4090-556.12WHQL.jpg


This GPU has benchmarked only, sorry. :D Sorry for "new" v4.1.0 but the difference of performance between v3.3.0 and v4.1.0 is none. ;)
 
3060 Laptop, Ver. 3.3.0, 556.12

Screenshot (102).png


WX 9100, Ver. 3.3.0, Pro 24.Q1

Screenshot (16).png


WX 9100, Ver. 4.2.0, Pro 24.Q1

Screenshot (17).png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top