Browser Bechmark scores

[lexluthermiester]

I can only test one browser. I use Firefox all day and hate Chrome. Chrome has the higher market share, so I'll use that

The CPU test suite is like 40 additional benchmarks, so gotta make compromises in terms of run time/complexity

Ah, good points.

 

[SchumannFrequency]

- WebXPRT (haven't looked into version 3 vs 4, but I'll be testing with a single Chrome version with updates disabled)

The browsers I had issues with in WebXPRT 4 were Epiphany, Falkon, and Konqueror.

With Firefox, Chromium, Edge and Chrome you will not experience any problems in the latest version.

 

[W1zzard]

The browsers I had issues with in WebXPRT 4 were Epiphany, Falkon, and Konqueror.

With Firefox, Chromium, Edge and Chrome you will not experience any problems in the latest version.

Sorry for OT

Do you feel it's worth it (in the context of CPU reviews) to try to build some kind of test for "browser multitasking", like open 100 tabs, load html, wait for render to complete? Haven't really noticed any slowdowns in web browsing (as long as the sites are using somewhat well-behaving JS)

 

[lexluthermiester]

With Firefox, Chromium, Edge and Chrome you will not experience any problems in the latest version.

I can confirm this on FireFox. I'm currently on the 91.xESR and just finished a run. It runs well and completes without issue(got a score of 94, is that good?!?). Also ran it in Iron(Chrome Fork)100 and it completes without complaint.

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Sorry for OT

Do you feel it's worth it (in the context of CPU reviews) to try to build some kind of test for "browser multitasking", like open 100 tabs, load html, wait for render to complete? Haven't really noticed any slowdowns in web browsing (as long as the sites are using somewhat well-behaving JS)

This is my hardware and software:
Hardware: Intel i3-3240 + 4GB RAM @1600MHZ single channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB
Software: FreeBSD + Chromium

When I open around 110 tabs with different types of standard websites my CPU keeps fluctuating between 1-4% usage according to 'top'. Every few seconds the CPU spikes to a maximum of 14% CPU usage and after this super short spike it goes right back to +- 2% CPU usage. I can open about 150 tabs from the wallhaven site before it becomes unstable, and that's because I'm out of RAM.. Loading of websites is also relatively fast, even with the heavier websites. I can't speak for windows but Linux and BSD systems aren't going to have any problems with multitasking/many tabs/load html/rendering unless they have other apps open that take a lot of CPU. But for just browsing you're not going to have any problems on modern CPUs even if you use heavier websites.

I can confirm this on FireFox. I'm currently on the 91.xESR and just finished a run. It runs well and completes without issue(got a score of 94, is that good?!?).

Which CPU do you use?

You should always look at your result in perspective of your hardware. I get a result of 112 in FreeBSD in Firefox on the i3-3240. In Clear Linux I get a result of 111 in the same browser on the same hardware.

I also have a Thinkcentre-M75 with Ryzen 5 Pro 3400G and it gets 130 on windows11 with Edge. On the same hardware but with Clear Linux and with Firefox it gets 135.

Those are my results for WebXPRT 4, the older version (WebXPRT 3) gives higher results.

 

[lexluthermiester]

You should always look at your result in perspective of your hardware. I get a result of 112 in FreeBSD in Firefox on the i3-3240.

Xeon E5-2667 V2. I was doing a lot of other things while running the tests, which IMHO gives a more realistic score.

I also have a Thinkcentre-M75 with Ryzen 5 Pro 3400G and it gets 130 on windows11 with Edge.

Also on Windows.

 

[I hit the lottery]

12600k on chrome i just installed...cuz I think its trash....and ofcourse it runs best on chrome, they designed it....reeeeeee

 

[Det0x]

One of my older benches from 16.04.2021:

• Speedometer 2.0 = 211
• Octane 2.0= 77030
• Mozilla Kraken 1.1= 521ms
• INTELedtechnologies.com WebXPRT 3 = 336

Know i can get higher scores with a newer updated browser

*edit*
Other screen from 15.06.2021

Chrome version 91.0.4472.106

*edit2*
07.12.2021

Chrome version 104.0.5112.102

5950x

 

[I hit the lottery]

Chrome stock,. firefox does like 220.

 

[SchumannFrequency]

I only have a 10 year old dual core CPU and also slow single channel RAM, so this is pretty OK.

I think that with the R9 7950X in combination with high clocked dual channel RAM I would get over 100 000 in Octane 2.0 and over 400 in Speedometer 2.0

 

[Athlonite]

Vivaldi

2.8.1664.36 (Stable channel) (64-bit)

View attachment 132636

Vivaldi

5.4.2753.47 (Stable channel) (64-bit)

Seems Vivaldi has made a lot of improvements

 

[arabus]

 

[arabus]

Pentium G7400 with new microcode 2C.
2core 4 threads

 

[SchumannFrequency]

AMD R5 PRO 3400G + mageia & Brave browser

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Clear Linux is almost as fast as GhostBSD in kraken-1.1

 

[AMF]

 

[SchumannFrequency]

AMD R5 PRO 3400G + Clear Linux & Opera browser

AnandTech November 5, 2020

AMD R9 3950X in 2021 -- 50916

AMD R5 3400G in 2023 -- 49437

 

[SchumannFrequency]

The 11 year old i3-3240 is now almost exactly as fast as the i9-7920X (several years ago) in Octane.

 

[Athlonite]

My lowly R7 5800X

 

[SchumannFrequency]

iPhone 13 + Safari 16.4 + WebKit 604.1

 

[lexluthermiester]

My lowly R7 5800X

Laughed reading this... "Lowly" indeed.

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

i9-13900k running Microsoft Edge

 

[lexluthermiester]

View attachment 300290
i9-13900k running Microsoft Edge

That's a damn decent score, but Edge? How's it look with Firefox?

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

That's a damn decent score, but Edge? How's it look with Firefox?

Scores with other browsers:
Opera = 107601
Google Canary = 95732
Firefox = 51197

 

[P4-630]

Firefox = 51197

In other words, Firefox is slow...