- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Messages
- 14,141 (2.05/day)
- Location
- Nebraska, USA
System Name | Brightworks Systems BWS-6 E-IV |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.9GHz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 Rev 1.0 |
Cooling | Quality Fractal Design Define R4 case, 2 x FD 140mm fans, CM Hyper 212 EVO HSF |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4 3000 Corsair Vengeance |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GEForce GTX 1050Ti 4Gb GDDR5 |
Storage | Samsung 850 Pro 256GB SSD, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB SSD |
Display(s) | Samsung S24E650BW LED x 2 |
Case | Fractal Design Define R4 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova 550W G2 Gold |
Mouse | Logitech M190 |
Keyboard | Microsoft Wireless Comfort 5050 |
Software | W10 Pro 64-bit |
I think this is a great point.Heat is reason why i run sata.
When it comes to performing program tasks (like moving objects in a game, rendering graphics, or compiling a large data base) - other than loading files - the drive's performance really plays very minor role compared the CPU, graphics solution and RAM. And that is particularly true if there is a big chunk of RAM for the OS and CPU to play in.
It is very important to remember that even the slowest SSD can run circles around the fastest hard drive. So yes, while there are some SSDs that are faster than the 980 PRO, that's like comparing a Porsche 911 (SATA SSD) to a Bugatti (NVMe M.2 SSD) to a Ford Fiesta (hard drive).
My point too - that is, in a blind side-by-side comparison, a user is very unlikely to "see" any difference between a decent SATA SSD and the NVMe M.2 SSD running in two otherwise identical computers. And if not side-by-side, they will not notice any difference - except on paper (benchmark results).but the point is that the difference in real world usage isn't noticeable according to reviewers,
As far as that Anandtech review - that was made way back in 2020 when the Samsung first came out. Samsung has made some tweaks to the SSD since then and some new products have come out since then too. That is why I posted a link to a more current review.
And to be fair - at some point, when you are spending your own money - personal preference is indeed a valid factor in the purchase decision as long as it does not blind you to some obvious, relevant and critical flaw in the product.
These are two very different, almost polar opposite (in terms of hardware requirements) tasks. For sure, moving files around is obviously very disk intensive. But video editing is MUCH MORE dependent on CPU and RAM horsepower. In fact, disk performance is almost insignificant for video editing.If you're copying hundreds of GB every day or work with video editing