• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Busted: Microsoft-hired agency paying bloggers to write pro-IE posts

Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,923 (1.80/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
SocialChorus, an "advocate marketing" firm
working on behalf of Microsoft, has been offering
to pay bloggers for promoting Internet Explorer.
The campaign was exposed after popular blogger
and Twitter designer Paul Stamatiou, who also
contributes to TechCrunch as a guest writer, was
approached by the company to write a paid piece.
Today Microsoft offered to pay me to
blog about Internet Explorer. There's not
enough bitcoin in the world..
— Paul Stamatiou (@Stammy) June 17,
2014
Besides Stamatiou, TechCrunch founder and
former editor Michael Arrington also received the
offer through an email.
“In this program, we are looking to spread the
word about the new Internet Explorer web
experience in a cool, visual way, which is where
you come in”, it read, adding that if Arrington
accepts the invitation to work on the program,
he'll have to come up with a blog post by July
10, for which he'll be paid.
Arrington responded to the email asking, “Is this
for real?”. The vendor then apologized and said
they weren’t sure how they got on the email list,
and ended the message with “Go TechCrunch!”.
Of course, sponsored posts are not unusual, and
any reputable site that do accepts them will
clearly disclose it as such and make sure its a
good fit for the audience. The particulars of
SocialChorus' campaign are unknown.
A quick look at the marketer's website reveals
that Microsoft's Bing team is, or at least has
been, one of its customers. Microsoft officials, on
the other hand, are distancing themselves from
the campaign.
When reached out for a comment, a Microsoft
spokesperson said the "action by a vendor is not
representative of the way Microsoft works with
bloggers or other members of the media". Since
then, the program has been suspended.
SocialChorus' poor execution certainly backfired,
harming Microsoft more than doing IE any good.
A quick search for the #IEBloggers hashtag on
Twitter reveals the hilarious -- if unintended --
results.
Internet explorer stole my car and
tortured my dog. #iebloggers
— Maxwell Lamb (@Panopticrat) June
18, 2014
As an independent consultant, IE
compatibility has brought in more money
than any other browser. Love IE! #
IEBloggers #RethinkIE
— jeswin (@jeswin) June 18, 2014



http://www.techspot.com/news/57162-...cy-paying-bloggers-to-write-pro-ie-posts.html
 
All companies do this. Not sure where the surprise is.

Anyway IE is perfectly fine and has a bad rep from YEARS ago now. Its really a totally different browser than it was say 10 years ago. However people are idiots so gorilla advertising like this is a great way to counter a bad rep OR CREATE a bad rep.

It can also be said Google paid firms to bad mouth IE. I mean really it doesn't make any F#$KING difference. Use what you like but, read security reviews. If you do that you will see Chrome and IE are both great browsers today. However Firefox is wide open time bomb currently. However people still swear its the 1337 because it community backed. It fits into a narrative not the real world. Can security reviews be tainted? SURE! All the time. Read all reviews and news from multiple sources and assume the truth is in the middle somewhere.

Meh......I;m just ranting at this point.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if MS knew about this or the vendor made a marketing "mistake".

Not the first time a sore loser marketing firm trashes a former client.

Either way it's not needed, IE is good.
 
Yea I do not understand the surprise, I would have been actually surprised that they were not doing this.

Truth be told, IE has a reputation from people that even today in unjustly given and keeps itself down. There is nothing wrong with IE in its current form and it does the job just as well as the others. That being said I do use Firefox a bit more just because its a personal preference, but I have no qualms when using IE or using it and heck sometimes I just click it because its the first icon I see.
 
Yes, IE is much better than it used to be. I prefer it over chrome at times
 
All companies do this. Not sure where the surprise is.

Anyway IE is perfectly fine and has a bad rep from YEARS ago now. Its really a totally different browser than it was say 10 years ago. However people are idiots so gorilla advertising like this is a great way to counter a bad rep OR CREATE a bad rep.

It can also be said Google paid firms to bad mouth IE. I mean really it doesn't make any F#$KING difference. Use what you like but, read security reviews. If you do that you will see Chrome and IE are both great browsers today. However Firefox is wide open time bomb currently. However people still swear its the 1337 because it community backed. It fits into a narrative not the real world. Can security reviews be tainted? SURE! All the time. Read all reviews and news from multiple sources and assume the truth is in the middle somewhere.

Meh......I;m just ranting at this point.

Its just because its Microsoft. Another thing for people to bitch about when it comes to that corp.
 
Yeah pretty sure this falls under marketing. Sure hidden marketing but still marketing. Or did you really think that people like DR OZ, Oprah, and co aren't simply more respected sources of advertising
 
I'm more concerned about whether they (and Sony) coerced Ubi (and possibly other pub/dev teams) into dumbing down PC graphics to keep their console sales strong.
 
I'm more concerned about whether they (and Sony) coerced Ubi (and possibly other pub/dev teams) into dumbing down PC graphics to keep their console sales strong.
Doubtful. Having played the game, it's obvious that they needed to re-write the engine fully for good performance on PC platform, and they didn't.

Now, what Microsoft would have done is asked for exclusive launch on console, or similar, if this title was of that much interest to them. Remembering that this is business, that would have been far cheaper. Marketing firms that do this sort of stuff aren't cheap.
 
Some members here have been approached to do something close to this. The person making the offers was turned in by everyone whom the offer was extended to and then banned.
 
Back
Top