• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Choosing a CPU based on GPU's and Resolution

Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.52/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
This is why I went with Bulldozer. I game at a high res and the programs I use the most are Handbrake and Windows movie maker which both use all 8 cores.
 
Last edited:
the 8350 is a new generation and has frequency improvements along with improvements to the architecture and the 4100 was the worst of the bulldozer line up
 
how come I saw a beastly improvement from the 4100 to 8350.... btw I didn't read all the review (not enough pretty pictures)

Is the 4100 not a quad core and the 8350 an octocore ( at least in AMD's terminology) or did I miss something, I think your answer lies within :)
 
so is an A8?
 
Intersting on the scaling once you become non-GPU bound.
 
Where is the financial balance point though ? Sure you don't need too much CPU grunt at high resolutions like 1440p. Thing is how much does a 1440p screen cost ? I have no idea but would guess at least £500 + ? You can get a decent 1080 X 1920 + a 3570K and a 7950/660 Ti for just the cost of the screen :eek:
Also while its nice to dream I cant justify one rig for gaming and another for encoding.
So back in the real world you want something running something between the FX6300 to FK3850 range or 2500K / 3570K to give you a good balanced and usable computer.

Mac :)
 
Back
Top