error_f0rce said:
I like your rig Alec and your graphics card rocks!!
Thank you, it cost me quite a bit, but worth every penny imo! It has been EXACTLY 10 years since I last put together a disk setup (using IDE/EIDE electronics-based HDD's that is) w/ a caching controller onboard!
They do make a diff., imo, & on diskbound I/O tests (or portions of benchmarks programs, typically).
(Last one I had (& still do have it around running Windows NT 3.51 fully patched) on a 486 Dx/4 133mhz, 32mb 30-pin 60ns FastPage RAM, All ISA/Vesa Local Bus slots, Diamond Stealth 64 video, & a TekRam DC-690 series 16mb caching controller - running a pair of Western Digital 4500rpm "Caviar" 424mb diskdrives).
error_f0rce said:
One thing though, if I may: I can't possibly imagine when you play Quake 4 that your 512mb of RAM isn't holding you back. If you upgraded to a gig I think you would see significant performance increases.
Well, the way I use my CENATEK "RocketDrive" Solid-State disk makes up for it, acting not only as my paging file location (pagefile.sys placement on 1st of 2 partitions & temp ops on 2nd partition w/ webpage caches, logging, & other stuff - see signature below) but also as a temp ops area!
Helps a great deal - when folks say "you need 1gb or more of RAM" I just explain how/why this one is setup as it is... it works well, basically paging IN RAM (very fast).
When I get the DDRDrive x1 PCI-express Solid-State disk in here, which uses DDR (vs. my current SSD using PC-133 SDRAM) & PCI-Express x1 slots (vs. my current SSD using PCI 2.2)?
This will ALL be even faster than it is now (best for seek/access, near 0ms speeds as is).
error_f0rce said:
What fps are you getting now?
This is a tough one, as I do not know the commandline or tilde ~ console area command to run a test on it, nor is my version of it (SMP model) any longer "frame-rate capped" because of its "tweaked" in-game config file... it varies WILDLY w/ that setting in place.
error_f0rce said:
Also, what 3DMark05 scores are you getting?
Don't run 3dMark here... I consider it a decent test, but not "real-world" enough!
E.G.-> Whenever I see reviews of CPU's, vidcards, you-name-it? I almost immediately go to pages with Quake 4 or Doom III on them as the tests (as I own those games, so I get a GOOD idea of what a particular part can do for me, performance-wise, w/ games I already own!)
* Seems more practical to me this way - a TRUE "lab practical" more-or-less!
APK