• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

DDR4 vs. DDR5 on Intel Core i9-12900K Alder Lake

saf81

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
It seemed like the DDR5 wasn't really given the best chance to reach its full potential with only half of the memory channels used? I think to make it an accurate test you would need to include quad channel DDR5 since each channel has a narrower bus than DDR4?

An example of the difference this can make is comparing memory bandwidth numbers between Threadripper and Ryzen chips.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,046 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
It seemed like the DDR5 wasn't really given the best chance to reach its full potential with only half of the memory channels used? I think to make it an accurate test you would need to include quad channel DDR5 since each channel has a narrower bus than DDR4?

An example of the difference this can make is comparing memory bandwidth numbers between Threadripper and Ryzen chips.
Each DDR5 module is dual-channel, two modules is quad-channel. This is the maximum config supported by the Alder Lake MC and what was tested
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
1,521 (0.88/day)
Processor Ryzen 5600X@4.85 CO
Motherboard Gigabyte B550m S2H
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock Slim
Memory Patriot Viper 4400cl19 2x8@4000cl16 tight subs
Video Card(s) Asus 3060ti TUF OC
Storage WD blue 1TB nvme
Display(s) Lenovo G24-10 144Hz
Case Corsair D4000 Airflow
Power Supply EVGA GQ 650W
Software Windows 10 home 64
Benchmark Scores CB20 4710@4.7GHz Aida64 50.4ns 4.8GHz+4000cl15 tuned ram SOTTR 1080p low 263fps avg CPU game
Best I can get is 3600 15-18-18-36. I don't think that's worth spending several hours of testing vs 3600 16-20-20-34
You don't have a B-die 2x16 or 2x8 laying around? :)
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
3,526 (0.56/day)
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
Processor Ryzen 5700x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aero G R1.1 BiosF5g
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14 w/ NF-A15 HS-PWM Fan 1500rpm
Memory Micron DDR4-3200 2x32GB D.S. D.R. (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Video Card(s) AMD RX 6800 - Asus Tuf
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB & 2TB & 4TB Corsair LPX
Display(s) LG 27UL550-W (27" 4k)
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 (no window)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220-VB
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex V Gold Pro 850W ATX Ver2.52
Mouse Mionix Naos Pro
Keyboard Corsair Strafe with browns
Software W10 22H2 Pro x64
due to gear 2 i doubt that can impress
Ya. Kinda what I had in mind. 3200 ddr4 stock timings vs ddr5 4800 stock timings

jedec vs jedec
Stock vs stock

from your review though it seems timings and frequency are about linear. With 3200 ddr4 at half the timings of 6000 ddr5 are pretty close in terms of performance

main take away use ddr4 until price of ddr5 is within % of ddr4 vs performance increase.
 
Last edited:

saf81

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Each DDR5 module is dual-channel, two modules is quad-channel. This is the maximum config supported by the Alder Lake MC and what was tested
Thanks for the clarification. After re-reading the review it was clearly 2x40bit channels per DIMM.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
2,670 (2.21/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
Thanks for the clarification. After re-reading the review it was clearly 2x40bit channels per DIMM.
It's 32 bits, not 40, because there's still no ECC on the data bus in consumer RAM. There's just on-die ECC, which is mandatory for DDR5, we've discussed it several times.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,687 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Interesting to see RDR performance was the only one showing benefits of DDR5, perhaps the slow move to larger on die caches and more split lanes at higher speeds like GDDR has in the consoles is the reason.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.12/day)
Remember last year when alot of people were saying that they wanted to wait until DDR5 as if that was going to be so amazing?
 

Jacek

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Check if your new system is running in Gear1, the board might be defaulting to Gear2 at higher mem clocks, which halfs the IMC clock and increase latency.
It can also be the board defaulting to really loose sub-timmings. Check those in the bios.
Hehe i check 3600cl14-15-15-15 Gear1 59ns!!!!!! i z390 system 39ns!!! disgraceful ddr4 handling z690 chipset........
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
269 (0.06/day)
Processor 12900K @5.1all Pcore only, 1.23v
Motherboard MSI Edge
Cooling D15 Chromax Black
Memory 32GB 4000 C15
Video Card(s) 4090 Suprim X
Storage Various Samsung M.2s, 860 evo other
Display(s) Predator X27 / Deck (Nreal air) / LG C3 83
Case FD Torrent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Ananda / AudioEngine A5+
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX 1000W
Mouse Amazon finest (no brand)
Keyboard Amazon finest (no brand)
VR HMD Index
Benchmark Scores I got some numbers.
Interesting to see RDR performance was the only one showing benefits of DDR5, perhaps the slow move to larger on die caches and more split lanes at higher speeds like GDDR has in the consoles is the reason.
Other reviews showed large gains in WD Legion. Im sure others will pop up, but overall and for the foreseeable future, a good DDR4 kit will serve you just fine. Or so I hope considering thats what Im going with (... waits for mounting kit....)

I do appreciate more reviews and benchmarks to show how the DDR types stack up, and also Win10 v 11. But really, pitting brand new pricey DDR5 against the not just older but budget DDR4 options seems off. Sure, folks who have an old DDR4 kit lying around might want to see how it compares to DDR5, but realistically those who might put a new system together who want to know which to pick - how does this help them? Better DDR4 kits are widely available and quite cheap!
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,884 (0.76/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Thanks for the clarification. After re-reading the review it was clearly 2x40bit channels per DIMM.
Easiest way to think of it is both DDR4 and DDR5 configurtations are 128-bit wide total. DDR5 has 2 sub-channels per dimm for better interleaving.
 

Fantik

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Location
Portugal
DDR4 motherboards are not as "feature rich". Expect less of a "premium feel". As for example. Why does the ASUS TUF has 2 SATA ports when 4x is part of the chipset? Save one penny...
I'm with you. The problem is the only boards supporting ddr4 are not good. If they make the high end boards compatible with ddr4 that will be the best case. Now buy a 12900k and use a low end board
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
2,582 (1.35/day)
Location
UK, Leicester
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 3080 RTX FE 10G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO (OS, games), 2TB SN850X (games), 2TB DC P4600 (work), 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2X
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
I'm with you. The problem is the only boards supporting ddr4 are not good. If they make the high end boards compatible with ddr4 that will be the best case. Now buy a 12900k and use a low end board
The steel legend looks the best board out the lot and it works with ddr4? One of only a few z690 boards with decent sata connectivity.


Unless you mean boards for extreme o/c and over engineered VRMs?
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
2,670 (2.21/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
DDR4 motherboards are not as "feature rich". Expect less of a "premium feel". As for example. Why does the ASUS TUF has 2 SATA ports when 4x is part of the chipset? Save one penny...
Hey, it has two horizontal and two vertical SATA connectors, plus one M.2 PCIe+SATA (not sure if all five are usable at the same time). Looking at the geizhals.eu database, most DDR4 boards have six SATA connectors and one M.2 SATA too. Connectivity wise they're not bad (but indeed none of them has M.2 PCIe 5).
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
1,747 (1.48/day)
Location
Alaska USA
I'm with you. The problem is the only boards supporting ddr4 are not good. If they make the high end boards compatible with ddr4 that will be the best case. Now buy a 12900k and use a low end board
First post on here and you already blew it.

https://rog.asus.com/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z690-a-gaming-wifi-d4-model/

 
Last edited:

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.18/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
3200 C14 seems to make one hell of a showing, on either AMD or intel
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
39 (0.01/day)
W1zzard thank you for all the work you put into this--this comparison is something i've been looking forward to for quite some time.

TPU is the best tech site on the internet.
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2018
Messages
413 (0.20/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name PC-GX1
Processor i9 10900 non K (stock) TDP 65w
Motherboard asrock b560 steel legend | Realtek ALC897
Cooling cooler master hyper 2x12 LED turbo argb | 5x12cm fan rgb intake | 3x12cm fan rgb exhaust
Memory corsair vengeance LPX 2x32gb ddr4 3600mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3080 10GB Gaming Z Trio LHR TDP 370w| 551.76 WHQL | MSI AB v4.65 | RTSS v7.35
Storage NVME 2+2TB gen3| SSD 4TB sata3 | 1+2TB 7200rpm sata3| 4+4+5TB USB3 (optional)
Display(s) AOC U34P2C (IPS panel, 3440x1440 75hz) + speaker 5W*2 | APC BX1100CI MS (660w)
Case lianli lancool 2 mesh RGB windows - white edition | 1x dvd-RW usb 3.0 (optional)
Audio Device(s) Nakamichi soundstation8w 2.1 100W RMS | Simbadda CST 9000N+ 2.1 352W RMS
Power Supply seasonic focus gx-850w 80+ gold - white edition 2021 | APC BX2200MI MS (1200w)
Mouse steelseries sensei ten | logitech g440
Keyboard steelseries apex 5 | steelseries QCK prism cloth XL | steelseries arctis 5
VR HMD -
Software dvd win 10 home 64bit oem + full update 22H2
Benchmark Scores -
However, there are many things to consider when choosing to take the DDR4 route. You'll need reasonably fast memory able to sustain Gear 1 mode and tight timings—we recommend something similar to our DDR4-3600 configuration. Intel memory controllers aren't very picky about dual-rank modules, at least while you stay in Gear 1. In our performance results, Dual-Rank DDR4 Gear 1 at DDR4-3200/3600 is able to stay ahead of their DDR4-4000/4400 single-rank Gear 2 counterparts. In conclusion, you could avoid paying the hefty DDR5 early-adopter tax if you're willing to live with a single-digit percentage performance hit in applications, and a negligible hit in gaming performance. On the other hand, if you want the absolute highest performance, DDR5 is what you want, but be ready to pay for it. I am happy to report that running DDR5 is trivial, at least on my G.SKILL Trident Z memory kit. Just enable XMP and you're done. Overclocking and tweaking was also trouble-free, and straightforward, which is an impressive feat for a technology that's as new as DDR5.

==== so, DDR 4 is the past and DDR5 is the future of pc gaming..... alright.... see u there, 1-2 years ..... when the price is right......
 

JD100

New Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
What were the RAM settings used for Zen 3 CPUs in this benchmark?
 

UnCertainty

New Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Something i havent seen anyone test yet, is how it does vs high end ddr4, like 2x16 4000 cl14, for example, or 4x8 4000 cl14.
I'm wondering the same. I have ddr4 4000 cl15 and I haven't spent any time oc'ing it.

The performance gain is so small for ddr5(~3-4% average) I would bet that ~ddr4-4400 cl14/15 would at least tie the ddr5.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,046 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
What were the RAM settings used for Zen 3 CPUs in this benchmark?
Other test systems are the same as in our Core i9-12900K review.

 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
476 (0.17/day)
Oh damn we'll lose 0.8% performance going with DDR4!!!

I feel sorry for all those people that buy memory kits faster than 3200.
 
D

Deleted member 215115

Guest
Oh damn we'll lose 0.8% performance going with DDR4!!!

I feel sorry for all those people that buy memory kits faster than 3200.
Ok, buddy. You go buy a 3200 kit. The rest of us will see double-digit extra fps just from tuned, faster memory. I guess we're all suckers and we're seeing things.

Who knew maximizing performance was this easy? All those idiots running DDR4-4800 CL14 in their 10900K builds. Just get a 3200 kit, dummies. :laugh:
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
476 (0.17/day)
Ok, buddy. You go buy a 3200 kit. The rest of us will see double-digit extra fps just from tuned, faster memory. I guess we're all suckers and we're seeing things.

Who knew maximizing performance was this easy? All those idiots running DDR4-4800 CL14 in their 10900K builds. Just get a 3200 kit, dummies. :laugh:

You can tell the difference between 140fps and 145fps? Or 50fps and 52fps @ 4K? You genius.

Yep, I'll stick to 3200 memory. And I do serious work with my PC in any case, I'll leave high refresh gaming to the man children with nothing better to do with their time
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.18/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Oh damn we'll lose 0.8% performance going with DDR4!!!

I feel sorry for all those people that buy memory kits faster than 3200.
Ah, remember that its the timings that made the difference there - 3200 CL14 is basically not for sale in Au, period.

3200 C14/3600C16 seem to be ideal, beyond that the gains seem to be trivial.
 
Top