• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Diskeeper 2007 will run in background to eliminate fragmentation as it appears

zekrahminator

McLovin
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
9,066 (1.29/day)
Location
My house.
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane @ 2.8GHz (224x12.5, 1.425V)
Motherboard Gigabyte sumthin-or-another, it's got an nForce 430
Cooling Dual 120mm case fans front/rear, Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro, Zalman VF-900 on GPU
Memory 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800
Video Card(s) Sapphire X850XT @ 580/600
Storage WD 160 GB SATA hard drive.
Display(s) Hanns G 19" widescreen, 5ms response time, 1440x900
Case Thermaltake Soprano (black with side window).
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Live! 24 bit (paired with X-530 speakers).
Power Supply ThermalTake 430W TR2
Software XP Home SP2, can't wait for Vista SP1.
A lot of Windows users these days have a lot of processes running in the background. This can be good or bad, but it definitely does not help a disk defragmenter do it's job. And so, the makers of Diskeeper 2007 made sure that users would not have to worry about how their various processes affected the performance of their degragmenter. Their "InvisiTasking" software runs in the background, automatically prioritizing itself as activity increases and decreases. This effectively makes Diskeeper 2007 run as if it's not there, and defragments as fragmentation appears, instead of at regular scheduled intervals. Diskeeper 2007 costs £23 for a home PC and from £285 for a Windows server.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Hrmmmmm. I'll have to check this out.
 
I use [Version: 10.0.608.0} and it rocks if the 2007 v.is as good it will be worth the $$
 
This will be a problem for those that play online games like BF2, etc.
 
nah, I'm pretty sure you can turn this feature off their pretty smart people behind this program. I also use it myself excellent program.
 
Oh hell yeah, I definitely have to get this version. I use one older version (like last years) and that rocks~!
 
I've learned that if it ain't broke don't fix it. If it rocks keep what you have because it won't get better then that.
 
I've learned that if it ain't broke don't fix it. If it rocks keep what you have because it won't get better then that.

In 1968, my fathers ESS HEIL Air Motion Transformer speakers were top of the line, and sounded amazing - paper cones and all. While they still sound very good, my Totem Forests blow them out of the water - with a driver half the size.
 
In 1968, my fathers ESS HEIL Air Motion Transformer speakers were top of the line, and sounded amazing - paper cones and all. While they still sound very good, my Totem Forests blow them out of the water - with a driver half the size.
That's false on several factors:
-30+ technology gap which is not relevant to this thread. (2006 vs 2007 is the issue here)
-you are trying to compare technology from 1968 which is more then arrogant on your part (again we are talking recent tech)
-and it barely beats it compared to todays standard
-there are people still satisfied by ESS HEIL
Therefore, your example is false by every stretch of the term used.
 
That's false on several factors:
-30+ technology gap which is not relevant to this thread. (2006 vs 2007 is the issue here)
-you are trying to compare technology from 1968 which is more then arrogant on your part (again we are talking recent tech)
-and it barely beats it compared to todays standard
-there are people still satisfied by ESS HEIL
Therefore, your example is false by every stretch of the term used.

This is EXACTLY what you said above
If it rocks keep what you have because it won't get better then that.
I just showed you how a technology can get better, you said it won't get any better. How is that false?


Recent tech - how about the explosion of the Core2Duo - as compared to the 939. Both are recent techs, everyone said AMD was the best. Now it's intel.
 
Guys, what is with all this arguing in the news section?
 
We need to let out e-penises grow. You know that.
 
I much prefer O&O's method of defragmenting any time the screen saver comes on. Though I find that hard drives don't get fragmented enough to really even use that feature. A weekly defrag is really all that is necessary, and even then I only defrag the volumes that are 4% fragmented or more.
 
My drives get freakin fragged after all the downloads and gaming i do on it :D I got hold of Diskeeper, checked it out and its cool, the invisitasking is just what i needed!Not that the other commercial defraggers out there are crap but, i think i liked this one to all others on my system.
 
Back
Top