- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 24,173 (6.13/day)
- Location
- The Washing Machine
System Name | Tiny the White Yeti |
---|---|
Processor | 7800X3D |
Motherboard | MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi |
Cooling | CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3 |
Memory | 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000 |
Video Card(s) | ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming |
Storage | Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB |
Display(s) | Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440) |
Case | Lian Li A3 mATX White |
Audio Device(s) | Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova G2 750W |
Mouse | Steelseries Aerox 5 |
Keyboard | Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II |
VR HMD | HD 420 - Green Edition ;) |
Software | W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC |
Benchmark Scores | Over 9000 |
Thats some unique graphics card you got there: "GTX 170Ti "![]()
Runs minesweeper @ 240 fps
in ultra.
That is my idea too when it comes to ultra. The other examples I gave about the choice for PC however, are not dependant on your bank account but entirely on the platform. PC is the best way to get access to content and this also echoes in price and having many sources to pull from.
Ultra is that typical, 'you didn't know you missed this until you tried it'. A bit like drugs. If you've always done medium, its just fine, and you won't game a second less for it, but still get all of the advantages a PC brings. And really todays reality is that Ultra is 75% unnecessarily heavyweight settings and the other quarter is built on commercial gain. We don't directly benefit from having ultra settings that are very heavy. GPU vendors do. We do instead benefit from code and settings/balance that runs well and efficiently on GPUs. GPU vendors... don't

Every once in a while a game gets released that runs so ridiculously well while looking so good, it kinda sets all the other ultra-settings in games straight and shows you how many times you've been screwed over the past years.
Last edited: