Final Fantasy XIV: Endwalker GPU benchmark/Post Your Scores

[Auer]

Try to reduce GPU core overclock when testing 1440p.. Maybe that will help

Bone Stock seems to work. That's it for me, I can only take so much cuteness.

seems this bench uses basically only 1-2 cpu cores, so thatswhy 1080ti is beating 2080ti etc.

View attachment 207656

Really?
My 5800X seems to be using most of the cores at around 4850MHz.
Usually 6 of them or so pegged simultaneously.
According to HW monitor.

 

[Zyll Goliat]

Chart updated

C'mon where are those people with GTX 1070,1060,1050.....GTX 980,970...post your scores!!!!

 

[mrthanhnguyen]

Do not beat me plz

 

[Good Guru]

4790k @ 4.8 ghz
32GB DDR3 @ 2200 MHZ
6800xt @ 2584 mhz / 2080 memclock
1440p 18,363
2160p 13,290

 

[Solaris17]

THX for posting your results unfortunately Mod locked my opening thread

Mods dont do that. Its a forum feature. Just report it with a request to unlock

 

[mrthanhnguyen]

 

[basco]

5960x@4000\HT=off (no diff-on or off)
980ti@1440\1950mhz
32gb sr 2133cl10 (no diff 3200c14)
1440p\ 12094
sorry i do it again!!!! ok should be good now ? cpu ran at 4000mhz instead of 4200 but this is gpu bound at it´s best

Thanks for your work + time Goliath

 

[Zyll Goliat]

TY @basco Nice to see how GTX 980TI handling this game!!!ALSO @basco Can you repeat the test AGAIN with the MAXIMUM preset pls. otherwise I am going to delete your score because is not on maximum preset!!!
Leaderboard Chart Updated on the top of the thread!!!
Changes on the TOP @mrthanhnguyen just break the 30000 barrier!!!

 

[Det0x]

View attachment 207972

Very nice

Could you try a run at 1080p standard ? (and 1080p maximum + 1440p standard if you got time)
Would be interesting to see how a comet lake @ 5.5ghz VS zen3 @ 5ghz compare in this game.
(both is also running optimized memory overclocks for each platform)

 

[basco]

sorry don´t know why it´s resetting every now +then but only the graphic setting and not the resolution.
updated my post 32

i would like to see if the loading times are better on a NVME drive or something faster then a sata ssd like my samsung 850evo ?

 

[RadeoForce]

RX Vega 64 ~1680/1108(+timings)
R5 3600 4.55 GHz (fix)
Crucial Ballistix 2x8 3000 CL15 @ 3800 CL15 (Micron E-die)
ASUS TUF B450-pro gaming

 

[Zyll Goliat]

RX Vega 64 ~1680/1108(+timings)
R5 3600 4.55 GHz (fix)
Crucial Ballistix 2x8 3000 CL15 @ 3800 CL15 (Micron E-die)
ASUS TUF B450-pro gaming

Nice score for Vega 64!!!Good OC @RadeoForce you get result that is not that far away from RTX 2080 and 6800XT!!!
Leaderboard Chart Updated on the top of the thread!!!

 

[QuietBob]

A quick tip to give more context to the results. Click on "Save Score" to see your minimum frame rate in the fifth line of the resulting text file. You will find your average frame rate in the ffxivbenchmarklauncher.ini file in the benchmark directory, search for "FPS"

 

[Awwwyeahhhbaby]

sorry don´t know why it´s resetting every now +then but only the graphic setting and not the resolution.
updated my post 32

i would like to see if the loading times are better on a NVME drive or something faster then a sata ssd like my samsung 850evo ?

I ran this benchmark on a Western Digital SN850, scores are a little faster but HWinfo shows my throughput only hit 301 MB/s. Fore reference, WoW hits 452 MB/s, Metro Exodus hits around 180-200 MB/s, RE Village 350MB/s, Cyberpunk 481MB/s but the access latency is usually 0.1-16ms so despite never really hitting anything close to high bandwidth the access latency, super high IOPS combined with high throughput headroom is what makes these newer drives a bit faster overall.

Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.036 sec
Scene #2 2.223 sec
Scene #3 3.237 sec
Scene #4 1.38 sec
Scene #5 0.705 sec
Total Loading Time 8.581 sec

 

[basco]

thank you very much awyeahbaby !

 

[QuietBob]

i would like to see if the loading times are better on a NVME drive or something faster then a sata ssd like my samsung 850evo ?

In general, game loading times do not see much improvement from a PCIe drive over regular SATA. But in this benchmark they do scale with core count and IPC.
Maybe we should have a separate thread to compare the results?

 

[Det0x]

Had loadtimes all the way down to 7.0x seconds i'm pretty sure, but i only saved the score from the last run:

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker Benchmark
Tested on: 12/7/2021 20:14:59
Score: 29636
Average Frame Rate: 0
Minimum Frame Rate: 95
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1,015 sec
Scene #2 1,99 sec
Scene #3 2,823 sec
Scene #4 1,077 sec
Scene #5 0,544 sec
Total Loading Time 7,449 sec

DAT:s20210712201459.dat

Screen Size: 2560x1440
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum

*edit*

lol, why does this benchmark save random screenshots in screenshot folder ? Anyway, among the screens i found these from my testruns


OS disk = Corsair m.2 PCIE Gen 4 MP600 500gigs (benchmark ran on this)
Game disk = Corsair m.2 PCIE Gen 4 MP600 1000 gigs

 

[QuietBob]

Phenom II X4 @ 4.2
HD7970 @ 1125/1575
8 GB DDR3 @ 1800
min fps 19 - avg fps 37

 

[Anoniem]

Huh, a game I'll probably never play but benches are fine. Decided to do a quick run before going to bed and to get a baseline. Will be doing a clean install in the weekend, I'm wondering how much of a change it's going to be. Also everything is at stock now and the ambient is... hell. Will update when I've watercooled my card

 

[ShiBDiB]

That 1080Ti seems out of place

 

[Zyll Goliat]

Phenom II X4 @ 4.2
HD7970 @ 1125/1575
8 GB DDR3 @ 1800
min fps 19 - avg fps 37
View attachment 208250

WoW 7970 still kicking!!!That's actually GREAT score not that far away from RX 570!!!
Leaderboard Chart Updated on the top of the thread!!!

That 1080Ti seems out of place

Well it's a DX11 Benchmark and that 1080TI is OC nicely so.....

 

[QuietBob]

WoW 7970 still kicking!!!

Yep, that is one long-lived GPU
It does 33 fps min and 63 fps avg at 1080p max detail when paired with a Zen 2 CPU

 

[jlewis02]

i7 930 @ 4ghz
12gb ram
MSI 290X Lightning

This was the card at stock.

 

[Zyll Goliat]

i7 930 @ 4ghz
12gb ram
MSI 290X Lightning

View attachment 208640


This was the card at stock.
View attachment 208641

Nice....290X is still a very capable GPU.........
Leaderboard Chart Updated on the top of the thread!!!
That's the best 20 results and from now on I will only enter new result if is it some new and interesting GPU...otherwise chart will stay as it is......

 

[Sithaer]

WoW 7970 still kicking!!!That's actually GREAT score not that far away from RX 570!!!
Leaderboard Chart Updated on the top of the thread!!!


Well it's a DX11 Benchmark and that 1080TI is OC nicely so.....

Thats a surprising score from a 7970 for sure, not bad at all.

Tho keep in mind that I ran my 570 at reference 1244 MHz stock speeds as I'm not interested in OC in general.

290x stock scores are also where I would expect it to be, somewhat higher than a 570 but not by much cause a non x stock 290 should be the ~same ish on paper.

Its good to see more older/budget cards, those I can relate to.

Edit:

I noticed the talk about loading times and in my case/with my setup its between 12.2 - 13.4 seconds total, just checked the auto saved screens in the bench's folder.
Its installed on a 1TB Kingston A2000 NVMe drive with the updated firmware.