• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Final Fantasy XIV: Endwalker GPU benchmark/Post Your Scores

I might need a new CPU

OC of memory to 2700 does make its presence known, first run I had 19k. But the card's sitting at 60% util about half the bench, only the second last scene lets it rip at 100% and shows north of 300 FPS :D

View attachment 292932
not might you do that is a serious bottleneck for your gpu.
 
not might you do that is a serious bottleneck for your gpu.
Yeah TW WH3 also has a lot more potential, mid game campaign I drop to 80% util
But that's the only one really. I can wait abit for the 7800x3D and DDR5 to come down :)
 
This round AMD is so strong.
untitled.jpeg
 
push a little bit on air.


ff.JPG
 
1440p :

Endwalker 1440p.png


Screenshot (1517).png

4K :

Endwalker 4K1.png


Screenshot (1520).png

1080p :

Endwalker 1080p1.png


Screenshot (650).png
 
Le sigh, limited by my backup PSU (Stupid Saesonic bullcrap) which triggers OTP if I let the GPU go full power :( Capped at 550w for GPU in this run.
ff14Endwalker2.jpg

Looking through the thread, this seems to be the highest AMD GPU score ...lol. Final form will happen when my 1600T2 replacement arrives, expecting roughly 40k @ 700w GPU.

Remember kids RAM speed doesn't matter with X3D CPUs.../s.
 
Last edited:
Not making it to 40k on the RDNA2 sadly, but did make it a bit further at least, matching 4080 reported results:
ff14Endwalker-104-evc.jpg
 
One last hurrah for the 3090 :toast:

I tried to run a different resolutions to minimize my GFX bottleneck, but i was alittle surprised to see scaling all the way down to 1024*764 res :wtf:
Seems like this benchmark/my system is very much limited by graphic card again.

1024*768 maximum = 53814 points
1.png


1280*720 maximum = 52785 points
2.png


1920*1080 maximum = 44523 points
3.png


2560*1440 maximum = 36397 points
4.png


3840*2160 maximum = 19961 points
5.png
 
Some 5k wuhd Action. ~525w to the XT, This card has seen over 600w on more demanding benches but I will say the extra power really wakes these rdna3s up. Its Pretty much 4090 dx11 performance territory. I Have yet to see a 5k uw bench from a 4090, But considering 5kwuhd is 11.1 M pixels and 4k is 8.8 M pixels One could assume from the many 4k benches i've seen from the 4090, that this build is indeed in that area. I was trying to find my 4k bench I did a week or two ago but cannot currrently but I will rerun and post when i get a chance (iirc it was north of 50k) Pretty chill for 750$ card + 35$ to Mr.Elmor.
5kWUHDendwalker.PNG
 
Some 5k wuhd Action. ~525w to the XT, This card has seen over 600w on more demanding benches but I will say the extra power really wakes these rdna3s up. Its Pretty much 4090 dx11 performance territory. I Have yet to see a 5k uw bench from a 4090, But considering 5kwuhd is 11.1 M pixels and 4k is 8.8 M pixels One could assume from the many 4k benches i've seen from the 4090, that this build is indeed in that area. I was trying to find my 4k bench I did a week or two ago but cannot currrently but I will rerun and post when i get a chance (iirc it was north of 50k) Pretty chill for 750$ card + 35$ to Mr.Elmor.
View attachment 302338
Try in full screen, or at least 4k full screen.
 
Sure. here it is, Score is a bit down, due to it being 30-32c outside (90f) but you get the picture. Im sure 50k no problem when the temps go down at night.

View attachment 302433
It's weird that this game prefers AMD instead of Nvidia. Can you try at 1080p maximum to remove gpu bound ? Maybe windows 10 or drivers help a bit.
 
It's weird that this game prefers AMD instead of Nvidia. Can you try at 1080p maximum to remove gpu bound ? Maybe windows 10 or drivers help a bit.
Sure, ill do that in a bit. To be honest, in dx11 synthetic benches and.. well and even actual games that use dx11 this card smashes about anything. A flight sim thats very demanding all around that I play is dx11 and they got a few autopilot flight paths with you know alot of war going on around you and just capframex it and compare with others and I think i compared with 4-5 4090s and was averaging above them. But ONLY if I can keep it below 110c, But on air thats nearly impossible after 525w unfortunately.. But that speaks highly for xfxs stock fan setup. XFX legit killing these amd cards lately. This card as it sits literally just with a repaste of mx-6 can absolutely maintain under 100c at 525w at the plug on my kill a watt under gaming conditions.. Don't get me wrong, when its running at clocks like these its almost always 50-100% fan speed while gaming and after 70% these fans are actually quite loud. But impressive none the less. Like I said when I can get this water block on it and get above 550w to the 600 area.. then we'll know how gangster this card really is or isnt.

Reality hits about more modern games using dx12 ult/RT when im playing msfs2020 on ultra dx12 w\everything up and the 4090s are 15% ahead without breaking a sweat, I'm at 500w at the card and at that level it performs a just a bit above stock cooler equipped 4080s level i've compared with. Which is still stellar for what it is and total money invested imho! The card is legit super super fast people saying 6950 or 6800 is even close to this card are smoking crack. And Im a former 6950 on water and evc. Its not even close. I must send some praise to the 4090 tho, its efficiency is actually really good. I consider this card to spit out alot for the power its using. So I did the math against a few 4090s and found the 4090 being substantially more efficient under heavy heavy loads, it was impressive actually and the opposite that most claim about the card. So crap information is still rampant somehow on both teams..Truth is the 4090 is the king and truly beast mode but is strangly efficient while is slaps competition around and the 7900xt is strangly fast and strangly strong at 4k gaming right out the box, hogwarts/returnals showed us that.

But then I tried VR.............. AMD is trolling us pretty hard. AMD hasnt even attempted to fix it, the community has got it to acceptible levels *KINDA* in some big sims But a 4080 is like 40% ahead of thet xt/xtx, this is an obviously driver problem. I realize amd has high baud rate compliance right now and the companies have yet to really support it. But honestly they havent even tried. SO thats very dissapointing for me. But maybe when either community or AMD fixes it They could be solid to amazing in VR, if vr performance is like the pancake mode rast performance at ALL. But right now all amd rdna 3 is good for in VR is making you throw up from the jitters, very dissapointing from AMD and somewhat the headset guys, but cant blame them for catering to the company that sells way more cards I suppose. Its on AMD to bridge that gap. :(

Anyways, in conclusion I think 7900 xt got a bad rap because most everyone who bought one bought reference cards and ive handle and owned both. The build quality difference between reference and say, merc xfx or Nitro, taichi is staggering and it was reference cards that suffered and made up most of the owners having vapor chamber problems. OH And for future reference, for anyone thinking about an AMD card as prices come down. This is the second black edition card from XFX ive bought, after trying a reference rdna 2 and 3 and then grabbing an XFX BE card. These cards are ALWAYS ALWAYS clocking significantly higher mem and core speeds than most the other competition using the same hardware. So I think they are binned up a fair bit and the price increase isnt even bad over the non BE. I did infact email xfx to inquire and not surprisingly they declined to give specifics but DID agree that the black editions are indeed held to a higher standard when it comes to parts used at assembly time... *shrug* Take from that what you will. Anyways sorry to ramble. Ill be back in a while with that bench.
 
Sure, ill do that in a bit. To be honest, in dx11 synthetic benches and.. well and even actual games that use dx11 this card smashes about anything. A flight sim thats very demanding all around that I play is dx11 and they got a few autopilot flight paths with you know alot of war going on around you and just capframex it and compare with others and I think i compared with 4-5 4090s and was averaging above them. But ONLY if I can keep it below 110c, But on air thats nearly impossible after 525w unfortunately.. But that speaks highly for xfxs stock fan setup. XFX legit killing these amd cards lately. This card as it sits literally just with a repaste of mx-6 can absolutely maintain under 100c at 525w at the plug on my kill a watt under gaming conditions.. Don't get me wrong, when its running at clocks like these its almost always 50-100% fan speed while gaming and after 70% these fans are actually quite loud. But impressive none the less. Like I said when I can get this water block on it and get above 550w to the 600 area.. then we'll know how gangster this card really is or isnt.

Reality hits about more modern games using dx12 ult/RT when im playing msfs2020 on ultra dx12 w\everything up and the 4090s are 15% ahead without breaking a sweat, I'm at 500w at the card and at that level it performs a just a bit above stock cooler equipped 4080s level i've compared with. Which is still stellar for what it is and total money invested imho! The card is legit super super fast people saying 6950 or 6800 is even close to this card are smoking crack. And Im a former 6950 on water and evc. Its not even close. I must send some praise to the 4090 tho, its efficiency is actually really good. I consider this card to spit out alot for the power its using. So I did the math against a few 4090s and found the 4090 being substantially more efficient under heavy heavy loads, it was impressive actually and the opposite that most claim about the card. So crap information is still rampant somehow on both teams..Truth is the 4090 is the king and truly beast mode but is strangly efficient while is slaps competition around and the 7900xt is strangly fast and strangly strong at 4k gaming right out the box, hogwarts/returnals showed us that.

But then I tried VR.............. AMD is trolling us pretty hard. AMD hasnt even attempted to fix it, the community has got it to acceptible levels *KINDA* in some big sims But a 4080 is like 40% ahead of thet xt/xtx, this is an obviously driver problem. I realize amd has high baud rate compliance right now and the companies have yet to really support it. But honestly they havent even tried. SO thats very dissapointing for me. But maybe when either community or AMD fixes it They could be solid to amazing in VR, if vr performance is like the pancake mode rast performance at ALL. But right now all amd rdna 3 is good for in VR is making you throw up from the jitters, very dissapointing from AMD and somewhat the headset guys, but cant blame them for catering to the company that sells way more cards I suppose. Its on AMD to bridge that gap. :(

Anyways, in conclusion I think 7900 xt got a bad rap because most everyone who bought one bought reference cards and ive handle and owned both. The build quality difference between reference and say, merc xfx or Nitro, taichi is staggering and it was reference cards that suffered and made up most of the owners having vapor chamber problems. OH And for future reference, for anyone thinking about an AMD card as prices come down. This is the second black edition card from XFX ive bought, after trying a reference rdna 2 and 3 and then grabbing an XFX BE card. These cards are ALWAYS ALWAYS clocking significantly higher mem and core speeds than most the other competition using the same hardware. So I think they are binned up a fair bit and the price increase isnt even bad over the non BE. I did infact email xfx to inquire and not surprisingly they declined to give specifics but DID agree that the black editions are indeed held to a higher standard when it comes to parts used at assembly time... *shrug* Take from that what you will. Anyways sorry to ramble. Ill be back in a while with that bench.
Not long ago Nvidia was still better in dx11 but since amd improved their drivers, it seems amd is better now. And yes 4090 is really efficient, I took it for both downclocking and OC. I think they can improve dx11 games but nowadays it's not the tendency anymore. More in RTX/DLSS.
 
Oh Geez I forgot to reply here...SOOOO. I've since deleted the screenshot. Rather I corrupted windows and it deleted itself. I was struggling with 1080p a bit not going to lie. Ended up like 54 or 56k I think, was unable to match your 58k. But im guessing thats due to the slicker processor you run or maybe the 4090s massive bandwidth? Couldnt get the dang card to pull wattage and my "Stable" 7200 mt/s m die ram OC was giving me trouble as well ended up dropping to 7000mt/s. lol. So yep. Again sorry about the screenshot, but im sure for these old benches we can take my word for it, i'd rather not go through 3 hours of crashing again just to realize my memory tuning skills are not as sharp as they once were lol
 
Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G w/ 64GB ECC @DDR4-3200 all running stock on Wraith Stealth cooler topping out at about 61c.

gpu-z-0001.png
ffx bench-0000.png
zen-timings-0004.png


cpu-z-0001.png


hwinfo64-0002.png


hwinfo-sensors-0003.png


Same CPU, Motherboard, RAM but Power Color RX550. I expected the RX550 to do better however I was surprised the integrated graphics spanked the 550 so hard.
1689222857691.png
1689222898556.png
 
Last edited:
5800x
asus 6800 xt tuf gaming
stock
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-07-14 174913.png
    Screenshot 2023-07-14 174913.png
    644.6 KB · Views: 122
Ryzen 5 5600G @ stock
Radeon RX 5600 XT @ stock

1692510482517.png
 
Aorus pro v2, 4x8gb 3600c16q32gtzn b dies stock, if 1800, 5800x3d -30 co 100 70 100 edc, nzxt x62, 6900xt xfx,1200W corsair plat. Win 11 temps 49C full fan speed
edit : seen everyone having gpu's at 700W, wth.. mine is stock 300W
ffx.png
 
Last edited:
Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G w/ 64GB ECC @DDR4-3200 all running stock on Wraith Stealth cooler topping out at about 61c.

View attachment 304589View attachment 304587View attachment 304588

View attachment 304590

View attachment 304591

View attachment 304592

Same CPU, Motherboard, RAM but Power Color RX550. I expected the RX550 to do better however I was surprised the integrated graphics spanked the 550 so hard.
View attachment 304593View attachment 304594
A slightly updated score with the same APU but different memory 32GB ECC OC to DDR4-3200 and I figured out how to increase the video memory to 8GB.

1693801558187.png


1693801580814.png
1693801609511.png
 
sorry I only have a 24" screen

RTX 3060 slightly OC :laugh::fear:
1080P
ff xiv.png
 
5800x3D 4450mhz
7900 XT max clock set to 3.2ghz 380w. 2.6-2.7ghz sustained (Unreliable as GPU usage is never maxed)

Mostly CPU limited at 1440P. Between 68-90% usage.

image_2023-10-21_062644907.png


4K

Lower volts to 1025mv, 380w 2.7 - 2.8ghz sustained.


image_2023-10-21_070454947.png
 
Last edited:
FFXIV 1.png


Not a monster score like some of the powerhouses here, but still satisfied with result for my set up. Runs like a charm.
 
Here's mine.

FF-XIV 2560x1440 23 Oct 2023.jpg



FF-XIV 3840x2160 23 Oct 2023.jpg
 
Back
Top