• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

FireCuda 510 updated

Bait and switch?
 
I didn't understand.
He meant that they've replaced internals without letting anyone know.
In most cases it's not critical, but in your case it may be actually better.
Just for fun, can you run crystaldiskmark or any other SSD benchmark and post a screenshot here. I'm interested in write speeds.
 
He meant that they've replaced internals without letting anyone know.
In most cases it's not critical, but in your case it may be actually better.
Just for fun, can you run crystaldiskmark or any other SSD benchmark and post a screenshot here. I'm interested in write speeds.
I understood.

Here, I took this two days ago.
Ekran görüntüsü 2022-01-21 015640.png
 
Oh... well... Looks the same as with old chips. Same two channels, 667MB/s each.
 
Bait and switch?
Yes. The FireCuda 510 was launched with E12 + BiCS3, probably this sample uses E12S (same configuration but different process node, size and it uses a nichel heatsink) + BiCS4.
Same two channels, 667MB/s each.
Do you mean controller’s channels and speed? If so, it doesn’t have only two channels.
 
firecuda 510's E12 controller replaced with E12S?
 
Hi again. I have a question: What's difference between E12 and E12S.
They are both quad-core (2 ARM Cortex-R5 and 2 CoXProcessor) and eight-channel, but the E12S is fabricated on 12nm process node (E12 on 28), has a smaller size and a nichel heatsink (which, obviously, lead to better temperature).
firecuda 510's E12 controller replaced with E12S?
Probably yes, like all E12-based drives (Sabrent Rocket, P34A80, CS3030, MP510, etc.).
 
Back
Top