First Nehalem Benchmarks :)

[GoriLLakoS]

It is all i managed to take in digital format from a scan of the November Issue of the Greek version of the PCWorld Magazine

Nehalem, 3DMark06 CPU Score :

Nehalem, Everest Cache and Memory Benchmark @ Dual Channel :

Nehalem, Everest Cache and Memory Benchmark @ Triple Channel :

Nehalem 3DStudio Max 8 Rendering :

Nehalem, Canopus Pro Coder 3 :

Nehalem, Cinebench R10 Multicore bench :

Nehalem, Super Pi 1M, 4.5GHz@Air, 9.454s, Asus P6T Deluxe @ thelab.gr :

​

Nehalem, 3Dmark03 @ 24163Marks [ CPU 3742GHz @ Dual Channel, ATi HD 4870 X2 Default] :

Nehalem, 3DMark Vantage Score : H10488 :

Source

 

[giorgos th.]

mmmmmmm.3D tests are up eh...must check it...

 

[wolf2009]

wow look at that overclock

 

[GoriLLakoS]

More benches arriving fast enough

 

[GoriLLakoS]

1. Yeah...i asked for their file pics in order to have better resolution. This is true, but it is the same.
2. I do not see any difference.

May i know why are you so aggresive on me ? ? ? I can send you the issues to check them by yourself if you wish.

 

[CStylen]

1. Yeah...i asked for their file pics in order to have better resolution. This is true, but it is the same.
2. I do not see any difference.

May i know why are you so aggresive on me ? ? ? I can send you the issues to check them by yourself if you wish.

1. Then why did you lie on the first post that the images were scanned? On a side note, why would a magazine give you their screenshots...

2. The difference is the word World is capitalized.

 

[Solaris17]

1. Then why did you lie on the first post that the images were scanned? On a side note, why would a magazine give you their screenshots...

2. The difference is the word World is capitalized.

1. he just said those are the pictures that are scanned into the magazine people make mistakes W/E

2. The diffirence is Neglagable first off its a diffirent country i have seen many things from diffirent countries that do things a tad diffirent even within the same company

i personally think this forum has gone nuts about being totall D bags to people with nehalem info i mean cautious is nice but totally flogging someone is completely unneccisary and i wish you would all calm down shit when i get my stuff i have decided i will be posting absolutely no performance results for any of you until it hits market and im doing this why? well because why not? their should be no reason for any of you to treat me any diff from these guys and i dont want to be treated like that so tpu gets no before release reveiws shame.

 

[Binge]

Interesting... I really wonder what kind of cooling these things will require. They seem to be using high voltages to get those high clocks.

 

[GoriLLakoS]

1. CSTylen, it is not a lie man, if you buy this issue you will see them inside, i know the guys for there and they gave me the Original Files in order to can look them better. I do not see again why you are so agressive guys... is something going wrong?

Maybe the world "scan" it is the transaltion from Greek to English and it is wrong in your ears...but it is not a lie anyways.

2. Yes, i can see the difference from this point of view. But it does not change something.

Did i do something wrong and you do like this?

 

[Solaris17]

1. CSTylen, it is not a lie man, if you buy this issue you will see them inside, i know the guys for there and they gave me the Original Files in order to can look them better. I do not see again why you are so agressive guys... is something going wrong?

Maybe the world "scan" it is the transaltion from Greek to English and it is wrong in your ears...but it is not a lie anyways.

2. Yes, i can see the difference from this point of view. But it does not change something.

Did i do something wrong and you do like this?

banking on the fact they dont give a F#$% about cap lock

 

[DrPepper]

I agree with solaris why does everyone jump on anyone with nehalem benchmarks, I mean what difference does it make if they are fake or real .... none and they just present a bad image of tpu and make it look like a community of jackass'

 

[Solaris17]

I agree with solaris why does everyone jump on anyone with nehalem benchmarks, I mean what difference does it make if they are fake or real .... none and they just present a bad image of tpu and make it look like a community of jackass'

that and with this thread i dont see whats not to bealive...november is 2 days away the NDA is close to being lifted magazine companys are already getting ready to ship the copys with the info in them. and rushing to do so everyone wants to be first.

 

[PaulieG]

OK, back on topic guys...and enough with accusations.

 

[DrPepper]

4.5ghz is very impressive especially on air

 

[Solaris17]

4.5ghz is very impressive especially on air

its intresting how nehalem scales though my E7200 at 4.5ghz can get sub 10sec times either super pi needs an update or nehalem only works well with apps that have a serious need for multithreading

 

[DrPepper]

its intresting how nehalem scales though my E7200 at 4.5ghz can get sub 10sec times either super pi needs an update or nehalem only works well with apps that have a serious need for multithreading

I reckon nehalem wasn't built for games but for things like file servers, virtualisation, encoding and decoding and the like.

 

[Solaris17]

I reckon nehalem wasn't built for games but for things like file servers, virtualisation, encoding and decoding and the like.

I agree

 

[Binge]

I wish there was more to the article. The information I'd like to know is ram, motherboard, and proc speeds at which these benches were taken.

 

[Solaris17]

I wish there was more to the article. The information I'd like to know is ram, motherboard, and proc speeds at which these benches were taken.

i can tell you one thing 920's can oc and tripple chnnel ram produces a ludicris amount of bandwidth

 

[giorgos th.]

hey guys cut the crap...the benches ARE REAL....believe it or not..PERIOD..

 

[shawnizzzle]

I am deffinatly going to get one when they come out. I dont care if this is fake or not they have 2 threads per core. Thats going to give nothing but more performance. And whose of you that are dogging the one who put this thread on her. You can tell he prolly looked hard for information just like I do and wanted to share it with you that are to lazy to do it yourself. I for one have found alot of benchmarks on the core i7 and will not put any of them on here becuase of the inconsiderate people that constantly have to make you feel like S#$% for doing so. I agree with solaris when i get mine there will be nothing posted on here about what kind of scores i get with it or overclock for that matter.

All i can say is I for one am sure that ill own one shortly. For those of you that dont want one or aint getting one instead of posting something rude about it just save your thoughts for yourself as I do reading alot of your stuff and keep running your dual cores like it the best thing on the market. Sorry to say but i cant stand them people that their S#$T dont stink

Gorillakos thanks for this info

 

[KBD]

if 4.5 Ghz on air for the Extreme version is true then this great news for Intel. I wasnt expecting this kind of an overclock with an onboard IMC, i thought that they would top out at around 4.2GHz. Now the question is how do the Corei7 920 and 940 overclock.

On a side note, its nice to see the Phenom 9950 beat the e8600 in most benchies

 

[KBD]

i assume you got this info from another source since i dont see it here, do you have a link?

If true, that is also great news.

Edit: what happened to your post, Solaris. I just replied to it and it dissapeared???

 

[Solaris17]

i assume you got this info from another source since i dont see it here, do you have a link?

If true, that is also great news.

Its true but i wont be posting info you can find it on the net though

 

[KBD]

Its true but i wont be posting info you can find it on the net though

ok, i'll see what i can find. this is getting very interesting.