• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Generic CPU Bench

i don;t know what problems people are having with getting different scores. i have ran the benchmark around 200 times and everytime i have ran it it is around 10 points of my normal score except for the first run after system startup.
 
Here's my go......Q9650 @ 4.410gig................
 

Attachments

  • CPUbench.jpg
    CPUbench.jpg
    104 KB · Views: 443
ROFL!!!!!

you cant touch this!

genericcpubench20071226se5.png


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Generic CPU Bench - 2007-12-26 - 4.15.24 - Bench Only.jpg
    Generic CPU Bench - 2007-12-26 - 4.15.24 - Bench Only.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 616
i cant see it :roll:
 
I loled, good job Fit :laugh:
 
Not much throughput there :rockout:
 
fitseries3 said:
no but time looks good.
Click to expand...

VERY good, but he's right, it is a bit erratic, I just ran it again at my 24/7 speed of 4gig, all proggies open, nothing tweaked and beat my 4.4gig score...........:confused:
 

Attachments

  • CPUbench.jpg
    CPUbench.jpg
    108 KB · Views: 424
i ran it like 12 times to see if i could get a lower score and it was really close every time.
 
fitseries3 said:
i ran it like 12 times to see if i could get a lower score and it was really close every time.
Click to expand...

Lol, just ran it again, exactly the same but I had the last pic still pasted in my clipboard aka virtual memory and even better again at 4gig..............
 

Attachments

  • CPUbench.jpg
    CPUbench.jpg
    106.9 KB · Views: 413
26,000 KCU/s? That's more than I get on my AMD quad. :)
 
Phenoms with HT 3.0 fare better than those on HT 1.1 (2000 MT/s) interfaces.
 
i still think 86/64 has big impact on this bm and should be in the tables.

i also think that with this bm being so lightweight that having background app/services running has little impact because it uses so little resource.

it seems to like low latency and high clocks, but dont we all :D
 
btarunr... idk if ya saw but... my 5.2ghz bench is better than my 5ghz run. i'll have more soon as well. i got one at 5.3ghz but didnt grab the screeny off of the bench computer for posting here.

:D

q9650 soon
 
cpu bench.png


E6600 @ 3.2 GHz
 
marsey99 said:
i still think 86/64 has big impact on this bm and should be in the tables.

i also think that with this bm being so lightweight that having background app/services running has little impact because it uses so little resource.

it seems to like low latency and high clocks, but dont we all :D
Click to expand...

it puts all cpu cores on 100% load and uses 200mb of ram. with firefox on in the background in got 200 Kcus off my normal score.
Generic%20CPU%20Bench%20-%202008-10-11%20-%2016.56.59%20-%20Full%20Screen.png
 
Last edited:
@roofsniper- pl. post a larger image. Use TPU's free image hosting.
 
that Xeon will be needing a little bit more stretch in OC like 4ghz+ :toast:
 
here is mine:
Generic CPU Bench - 2008-10-13 - 1.46.09 - Full Screen.png
 
a better run:

Generic CPU Bench - 2008-10-13 - 1.53.38 - Full Screen.png
 
How are the older Phenoms doing better than the newer ones?
 
AphexDreamer said:
How are the older Phenoms doing better than the newer ones?
Click to expand...

Don't know bro, I'll tell you something, my 9850BE was faster clock for clock than my 9950. Guess I just didn't get a good chip this time around. I got the 0831 CPCW stepping, the ones that are pretty quick and do 3.6 Ghz pretty much out the box are the 0836 DPDW stepping 9950's, unluckily I wansn't able to get a hold of one :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top