1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Generic CPU Bench

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by btarunr, Oct 12, 2008.

Page 4 of 19
  1. Oct 12, 2008 at 11:43 PM #76

    roofsniper New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    42 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    i don;t know what problems people are having with getting different scores. i have ran the benchmark around 200 times and everytime i have ran it it is around 10 points of my normal score except for the first run after system startup.
     
  2. Oct 12, 2008 at 11:44 PM #77
    Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    19,531 (4.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Here's my go......Q9650 @ 4.410gig................
     

    Attached Files:

    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:23 AM #78
    Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,508 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,120
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    ROFL!!!!!

    you cant touch this!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:24 AM #79
    DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,626 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    863
    Location:
    TX, USA
    i cant see it :roll:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:25 AM #80
    btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,791 (9.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,268
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I can't see it either. :) Bigger image pls

    (the CPU-Z, I mean)
     
  6. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:28 AM #81
    Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,508 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,120
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    ok.... now look ^^^
     
  7. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:32 AM #82
    Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,979 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,754
    Location:
    PA, USA
    I loled, good job Fit :laugh:
     
  8. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:36 AM #83
    Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,508 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,120
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    5.2ghz....

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:42 AM #84
    Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    19,531 (4.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Not much throughput there :rockout:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:43 AM #85
    Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,508 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,120
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    no but time looks good.
     
  11. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:47 AM #86
    Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    19,531 (4.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    VERY good, but he's right, it is a bit erratic, I just ran it again at my 24/7 speed of 4gig, all proggies open, nothing tweaked and beat my 4.4gig score...........:confused:
     

    Attached Files:

    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:49 AM #87
    Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,508 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,120
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    i ran it like 12 times to see if i could get a lower score and it was really close every time.
     
  13. Oct 13, 2008 at 12:51 AM #88
    Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    19,531 (4.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Lol, just ran it again, exactly the same but I had the last pic still pasted in my clipboard aka virtual memory and even better again at 4gig..............
     

    Attached Files:

    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. Oct 13, 2008 at 3:46 AM #89
    Particle

    Particle

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    22 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    26,000 KCU/s? That's more than I get on my AMD quad. :)
     
  15. Oct 13, 2008 at 4:10 AM #90
    btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,791 (9.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,268
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Phenoms with HT 3.0 fare better than those on HT 1.1 (2000 MT/s) interfaces.
     
  16. Oct 13, 2008 at 5:54 AM #91
    vega22

    vega22

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,382 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    627
    i still think 86/64 has big impact on this bm and should be in the tables.

    i also think that with this bm being so lightweight that having background app/services running has little impact because it uses so little resource.

    it seems to like low latency and high clocks, but dont we all :D
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  17. Oct 13, 2008 at 5:57 AM #92
    Fitseries3

    Fitseries3 Eleet Hardware Junkie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    15,508 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,120
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    btarunr... idk if ya saw but... my 5.2ghz bench is better than my 5ghz run. i'll have more soon as well. i got one at 5.3ghz but didnt grab the screeny off of the bench computer for posting here.

    :D

    q9650 soon
     
  18. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:00 AM #93
    Zehnsucht

    Zehnsucht New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    438 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    [​IMG]

    E6600 @ 3.2 GHz
     
  19. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:04 AM #94

    roofsniper New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    42 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    it puts all cpu cores on 100% load and uses 200mb of ram. with firefox on in the background in got 200 Kcus off my normal score.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2008
  20. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:39 AM #95
    btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,791 (9.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,268
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    @roofsniper- pl. post a larger image. Use TPU's free image hosting.
     
  21. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:43 AM #96
    RadeonX2

    RadeonX2 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,197 (0.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Location:
    Asia, PH
    that Xeon will be needing a little bit more stretch in OC like 4ghz+ :toast:
     
  22. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:51 AM #97
    Chicken Patty

    Chicken Patty WCG Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    28,598 (8.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,700
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    here is mine:
    [​IMG]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:54 AM #98
    Chicken Patty

    Chicken Patty WCG Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    28,598 (8.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,700
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    a better run:

    [​IMG]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. Oct 13, 2008 at 6:56 AM #99
    AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,324 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,001
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    How are the older Phenoms doing better than the newer ones?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  25. Oct 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM #100
    Chicken Patty

    Chicken Patty WCG Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    28,598 (8.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,700
    Location:
    Miami, Florida
    Don't know bro, I'll tell you something, my 9850BE was faster clock for clock than my 9950. Guess I just didn't get a good chip this time around. I got the 0831 CPCW stepping, the ones that are pretty quick and do 3.6 Ghz pretty much out the box are the 0836 DPDW stepping 9950's, unluckily I wansn't able to get a hold of one :(
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
Page 4 of 19

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)