Tatty_Two
Gone Fishing
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,801 (3.87/day)
- Location
- Worcestershire, UK
| Processor | Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK |
| Cooling | Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans |
| Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1 |
| Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC |
| Storage | WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS) |
| Display(s) | AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS |
| Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal |
| Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1 |
| Power Supply | Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular |
| Mouse | Coolermaster Storm Octane wired |
| Keyboard | Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech |
| Software | Win 10 Home x64 |
I know I have it but it still dont look as good as the GTO IMO, I only say that because for example in oblivion or any other graphic intensive game I have for that matter, at resolutions ABOVE 1280 x 1024 I cannot have both enabled and have the game on max settings with smooth framerates because the card wont quite handle it, so I drop it down a little, with the GTO without HDR but on higher settings it looks better, for me the HDR is not as important as the overall graphics quality...just a personal choice, am not suggesting anyone else would feel the same way.
However your points are the very reason why under normal circumstances I prefer ATi, generally I prefer the package ATi offers, was just VERY surprised with the GTO for the price. On my old monitor at 1280 x 1024 the 1800 did look better TBH.
Last edited:
