- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 2,785 (0.56/day)
- Location
- New Zealand
System Name | MoneySink |
---|---|
Processor | 2600K @ 4.8 |
Motherboard | P8Z77-V |
Cooling | AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower |
Memory | 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.) |
Storage | Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB) |
Display(s) | Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS |
Case | NZXT Switch 810 |
Audio Device(s) | onboard Realtek yawn edition |
Power Supply | Seasonic X-1050 |
Software | Win8.1 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes. |
The above figures also include math co-processors (Tesla, FirePro S series, and whatever miniscule number of Xeon Phi's are sold), medical imaging (mainly Quadro), non-embedded digital signage, and a host of other industrial applications. Matrox's product line is no different from any AMD or Nvidia visualization product. The only point to note is that Matrox's sales figures are so low that there would be a considerable margin of rounding to achieve a one decimal place final percentage.On a more serious note - I cant help feel that its unfair to include matrox in these charts because the commercial market isnt exactly their main focus. Matrox is more of an industrial market thing.