• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GTX 1070 specs and the reason that nvidia didn't unveil it!

What you ignore, bc you only seem to have read the summary article: Actually it's "faster than Titan X" in VR when using simultaneous multiprojection", not in general.

I really hope this isn't true, I could really use Titan X performance at the ~$400 price. :(

If you go only by what NVidia has given us, the 1070 has 6.5TFlops of power while the Titan X has 6.75TFlops. If the overclocking is as good as NVidia has shown us the 1080 is then it could very well be faster than it. If you just take the TFlop number at stock it's not.

Somehow there are 3 pages of discussion even without a source so this is pure conjecture/nonsense.

Gotta love it when TPU is used as a tool to spread baseless speculation.

EDIT: If/when there is any credit to this information, it'd be front page news, don't you think?

Wow and now a mod is even at it. Not sure when speculation and conjecture was a crime.
 
Last edited:

That's interesting, was this a slip from bta? If so then I can understand why it happened. But the OP is, well, no offense, no one. :p Maybe i give too much credit to the internet.. I don't believe for a second that the OP has a leak from a source. :p But I can say that I did do some math (referencing my first post) before this thread was started which I do for myself, because I like GPUs and the tech and the number of SP is what I guessed or 2048.

I don't see the harm in speculation and conjecture, but maybe I don't realize how things can spread, I look at a forum thread in TPU as a talk among like minded friends.


EDIT: Oh and I just noticed from the leaked slides of GP104 showing the layout of the core... It's not the same layout as GP100, it's just like Maxwell... Disappointing.. It seems like GP104 will not have the same shader configuration as GP100.
 
I really hope this isn't true, I could really use Titan X performance at the ~$400 price.

We'll just have to wait for the june reviews of the 1070. It will be interesting, to be sure. I'd rather wait, than take Nvidia's purposely vague claims at face value.
 
That's interesting, was this a slip from bta?

It was entirely my fault, actually.

While I agree the OP isn't really anybody, they've garnered this page a substantial amount of views over the last few hours, enough for a bunch of rumourmongering sites to throw up some poorly researched articles.
 
I don't see the harm in speculation and conjecture, but maybe I don't realize how things can spread, I look at a forum thread in TPU as a talk among like minded friends.

The problem is that conjecture threads, if often enough putting TPU high on search results for conjecture, will give us the same reputation as some lesser regarded sites.
 
The problem is that conjecture threads, if often enough putting TPU high on search results for conjecture, will give us the same reputation as some lesser regarded sites.

Shouldn't the reputation of TPU be from the main site and not it's forum threads?

I like civil intelligent speculation, I hope I can keep finding it here.


While I agree the OP isn't really anybody, they've garnered this page a substantial amount of views over the last few hours, enough for a bunch of rumourmongering sites to throw up some poorly researched articles.

Wow, really? Maybe the first post should be edited.
 
Shouldn't the reputation of TPU be from the main site and not it's forum threads?

I like civil intelligent speculation, I hope I can keep finding it here.

I agree with that. Sadly google doesn't differentiate.
 
so in the end. he was right 1920 sp :D
 
Shouldn't the reputation of TPU be from the main site and not it's forum threads?

I like civil intelligent speculation, I hope I can keep finding it here.




Wow, really? Maybe the first post should be edited.

Civil intelligent speculation is very prone to the predators that like pageviews and clicks, and the eternal troll.

Would be really nice if TPU has better bullshit filtering amongst its members (note: 'we' are still doing a pretty good job compared to 90% of all tech sites). I try to do my part, every time, but it's like carrying water to the sea. This thread being case in point. I really do NOT mind mods stepping in earlier to cull the BS.

This thread proved that a vast majority of long term and new forum members have trouble with comprehensive reading and/or common sense.
 
Back
Top