• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GTX 680 Generally Faster Than HD 7970: New Benchmarks

Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,077 (0.27/day)
System Name Primary Rig
Processor e8500 Q822A549 4.5ghz AIR
Motherboard Foxconn Mars P35
Cooling TRUE
Memory 2 x2GB Patriot Viper 1066 5-5-5-12 @ 1.8v
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5870 Unlocked
Storage 300gb Velociraptor
Display(s) Dell 24" Ultrasharp
Case Coolermaster CM690
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750w Quad Silencer
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Don't see NVIDIA's pricing any cheaper than AMD's 7970 if it outperforms it.
I do see NVIDIA's stock price of $14.50 going closer to $16.
Buy and sell 1k shares and there's your SLI setup after taxes.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,813 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
There's a good thing and a bad thing coming out of this (if true).

The good thing: AMD will be forced to lower their prices on current offerings.

The bad thing: nVidia will probably sell these @ the price AMD is selling theirs right now and charge even more for the top cards (assuming this is the mid-range card).


I really was hoping for a tighter race here. I don't care who wins as long as it's done so by a small margin so that more aggressive pricing is warranted.

This is bad ... :(
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
551 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 2400G
Motherboard Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling AMD Wraith
Memory G.Skill 2x8GB 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Dual-X OC R9 280X 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata 3 / Ultrastar 2TB / Seagate 2TB x2
Display(s) Samsung UN32EH5300 / LG 39LN5700
Case Phanteks Eclipse P400
Power Supply Thermaltake Smart PRORGB 750W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits
There's a good thing and a bad thing coming out of this (if true).

The good thing: AMD will be forced to lower their prices on current offerings.

The bad thing: nVidia will probably sell these @ the price AMD is selling theirs right now and charge even more for the top cards (assuming this is the mid-range card).


I really was hoping for a tighter race here. I don't care who wins as long as it's done so by a small margin so that more aggressive pricing is warranted.

This is bad ... :(
That's so true man...
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
I' ve got a sure source that the GPU-z clocks are totally wrong...
GTX680 works other clocks...
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
137 (0.04/day)
Location
Cheonan, South Korea
Processor R5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance 3200mhz no RGB shenanigans
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB
Storage Adata SX8200Pro 512gb + 1TB + 2TB Seagate Desktop
Display(s) Samsung S24F350
Case Cooler master Q300L
Power Supply Corsair CX600v3
Mouse Loigtech G402
Keyboard Corsair Strafe non-RGB
i wanna see real bench and gtx 680 vs 7970 same mhz of core and memory, make a test qith oc card vs stock is autofanboysm
880MHz HD6970 VS 732MHZ GTX 570, Is that an overclocked HD6970???
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
3,063 (0.74/day)
System Name ROG
Processor i5 9600K
Motherboard ASUS STRIX Z390-E
Cooling Corsair H100i platinum
Memory G.Skill Trident 3000mhz RGB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1080ti 11GB OC
Storage Samsung M.2 256GB + 1TB SSD +Seagate 2TB 7200RPM
Display(s) DELL S2716DG 2560x1440 144hz G-Sync
Case InWin 805C Red
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X AE-5
Power Supply EVGA 850W Gold
Software Win 10
Please be true please be true please be true. I want AMD's 7970 to free fall price-wise.
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,423 (1.99/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?


This is the correct picture from source... (not killing the 7970.) http://www.hkepc.com/7672/page/6#view

Just realised....

772 --> 1006 = 30% core clock increase

4008 ---> 6008 = 50% memory clock increase

54.2 ---> 72.2 fps = 33% fps boost

Now, given the clocks are 30% higher and there is likely a AA algorithm at work, I've just had a terrible dawning of, "it's not a super performer at all". The 28nm process just makes it allow for faster clocks. And with some clever tech helping out AA (which isn't a bad thing) it takes the biscuit.

But I'm just thinking if those 1GHz clocks and memory speed are true then it's simply a logical performance increase based on clocks, not architecture.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.70/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
Man, i guess it's also irrelevant if the name is gk104. If it performs like a 7970 or better, AND there isn't any higher performer nvidia product, AND it's priced equal to amd's highend part, then IT IS highend FFS.

There isn't any other nvidia card is it?, so, until nvidia releases a higher performer, GTX680 IS THE F** highend period.

It doesn't matter nvidia did an amazing job with gk110, the fact of the matter is that IT IS NOT EXISTENT, and when it is released then amd will have an answer, maybe not a better performer, maybe, but it won't be like nvidia will release that super duper hyper mega ultra uber monster gk110 and amd will only have 7970 as its highest performer (singlegpu). By that time amd may already have 8970, for all we know.
Yeah that's called adjusting to market, but that does not change the fact that this is Nvidia's mid-range GPU, and it WAS going to be priced at $300, before they realised they can price it higher.

Need to differentiate between high-end card/SKU and high-end chip. It's not the same. AMD's X2 cards where high-end cards, made of 2 mid-range GPUs. That is what their "small die" strategy is about. Apparently now Nvidia will do the same except with 1 GPU lol.
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.71/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
I think people always have too high expectations. Chip is quite a bit smaller than Tahiti so it is great feat if it even gets on par with HD 7970 performance. Like others, interesting to see if it also is better perf/w than Tahiti.
I never have expectation's of anything :laugh: I've been around enough GFX card release's to know that 99% of the time it's nothing special, maybe every 3 - 5 year's is cause to get excited because you KNOW the tech/performance is going to be massive but between card's 1 - 3 "series" apart the difference's aren't great enough for me to get my panties wet :laugh:

I was only expecting more of it because of all the "great" HYPE this card got! IF Nvidia did cut out the top performing card and send out it's mid range chip in it's place that is a TOTAL low blow to the customer's. If they have/had a monster they should have put it on the shelve's. Lord know's they always charge top $$$ might as well get top performance, when i say "top performance" i don't mean 5% - 10% more performance :eek:
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
91 (0.03/day)
This is the correct picture from source... (not killing the 7970.) http://www.hkepc.com/7672/page/6#view

Just realised....

772 --> 1006 = 30% core clock increase

4008 ---> 6008 = 50% memory clock increase

54.2 ---> 72.2 fps = 33% fps boost

Now, given the clocks are 30% higher and there is likely a AA algorithm at work, I've just had a terrible dawning of, "it's not a super performer at all". The 28nm process just makes it allow for faster clocks. And with some clever tech helping out AA (which isn't a bad thing) it takes the biscuit.

But I'm just thinking if those 1GHz clocks and memory speed are true then it's simply a logical performance increase based on clocks, not architecture.
A 7970 can't reach that FPS in BF3 on average, impossible.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
1,338 (0.27/day)
Processor e8200 3.93mhz@1.264v
Motherboard P5E3 Pro
Cooling Scythe Infinity
Memory 4gb of G.Skill Ripjaw 6-7-7-18@1404 and 1.62v
Video Card(s) HIS 5770 v2 940/1275mhz stock volts
Storage 1TB Hitachi
Display(s) Acer 22" Widescreen LCD
Case Blue Cooler Master Centurion
Audio Device(s) Onboard audio :(, and Klipsch 5.1 Pro Media's
Power Supply 650 Watt BFG
Software Vista 64 Ultimate
Yeah that's called adjusting to market, but that does not change the fact that this is Nvidia's mid-range GPU, and it WAS going to be priced at $300, before they realized they can price it higher.

Need to differentiate between high-end card/SKU and high-end chip. It's not the same. AMD's X2 cards where high-end cards, made of 2 mid-range GPUs. That is what their "small die" strategy is about. Apparently now Nvidia will do the same except with 1 GPU lol.
yet, nobody knows for 100% certain it WAS intended to be the high end. They MAY leave the gk100 for the x2 style card. Or maybe they called it 104 to get fanboys excited about how the mid-range card kicked AMD's butt so hard that they did not even release it:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: w3b
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.71/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
Or maybe they called it 104 to get fanboys excited about how the mid-range card kicked AMD's butt so hard that they did not even release it:rolleyes:
Ah the ol' bait 'n switch! Wouldn't be the first time (or the last) for shady tactic's, Nvidia style :ohwell:
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
551 (0.16/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 2400G
Motherboard Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling AMD Wraith
Memory G.Skill 2x8GB 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Dual-X OC R9 280X 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata 3 / Ultrastar 2TB / Seagate 2TB x2
Display(s) Samsung UN32EH5300 / LG 39LN5700
Case Phanteks Eclipse P400
Power Supply Thermaltake Smart PRORGB 750W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits
Yeah that's called adjusting to market, but that does not change the fact that this is Nvidia's mid-range GPU, and it WAS going to be priced at $300, before they realised they can price it higher.

Need to differentiate between high-end card/SKU and high-end chip. It's not the same. AMD's X2 cards where high-end cards, made of 2 mid-range GPUs. That is what their "small die" strategy is about. Apparently now Nvidia will do the same except with 1 GPU lol.
Doesn't matter man, "WAS" past tense. Still GTX680 = Highend.
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,423 (1.99/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
3DMark11 Extreme - 52.3%
3DMark11 Performance - 41.4%
BF3 - 33%
Batman AC - 35.7%
COD MW3 - 10%
Heaven Benchmark - 33.2%
Lost Planet 2 - 34.4%

This is how much faster it is over the GTX 580. Not bad at all for the 'mainstream card'. But again, those clock speeds make a big diff.

Given that a 14% clock increase on a GTX580 Lightning resulted in a 10% 3DMark11 Performance score on this review (http://www.guru3d.com/article/msi-geforce-gtx-580-lightning-review/20) you could argue that a 'X' % clock increase gives a ~70% 'X' increase in performance.

So by default with nothing else considered the architecture explains 30% of it's improvement but it's higher clocks make up 70%. Or in laymans terms, more than 2/3 of the extra fps from the GTX 680 are due to higher clocks.

This is simple percentages here based on figures. Not opinions and not conjecture. I know folk will argue but I dont care, to me, the clocks make the biggest impact.

Need a good W1zz review to make it all clear.
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.71/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
Need a good W1zz review to make it all clear.
Exactly! So stop this:

3DMark11 Extreme - 52.3%
3DMark11 Performance - 41.4%
BF3 - 33%
Batman AC - 35.7%
COD MW3 - 10%
Heaven Benchmark - 33.2%
Lost Planet 2 - 34.4%

This is how much faster it is over the GTX 580. Not bad at all for the 'mainstream card'. But again, those clock speeds make a big diff.

Given that a 14% clock increase on a GTX580 Lightning resulted in a 10% 3DMark11 Performance score on this review (http://www.guru3d.com/article/msi-geforce-gtx-580-lightning-review/20) you could argue that a 'X' % clock increase gives a ~70% 'X' increase in performance.

So by default with nothing else considered the architecture explains 30% of it's improvement but it's higher clocks make up 70%. Or in laymans terms, more than 2/3 of the extra fps from the GTX 680 are due to higher clocks.

This is simple percentages here based on figures. Not opinions and not conjecture. I know folk will argue but I dont care, to me, the clocks make the biggest impact.
Thank's for another post :)
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,423 (1.99/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
I like numbers...
And I like reviews...
It gives me the right to post things and then demand validation of my thoughts.

Thanks for giving me an excuse to reply!! :laugh:

Okay, next question for Btarunr and W1zz.

WHEN IS THE FRICKIN' NDA UP?
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.70/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
yet, nobody knows for 100% certain it WAS intended to be the high end. They MAY leave the gk100 for the x2 style card. Or maybe they called it 104 to get fanboys excited about how the mid-range card kicked AMD's butt so hard that they did not even release it:rolleyes:
Sure you can find all the "IF"s and "maybe"s you want but for the people who have nothing to fear, common sense prevails.

a) It looks like a mid-range chip and is called like a mid-range chip, but it was all part of a covert plan to confuse people. (And badly loose the high-end to AMD, had Tahiti performed as it should -> comparably as well as Pitcairn)

b) it looks like a mid-range chip and is called like a mid-range chip, because it IS a mid-range chip.

Occam's Razor== b) ;)

Doesn't matter man, "WAS" past tense. Still GTX680 = Highend.
We are discussing different things. I'm not discussing at which price segment it belongs now, but which chip in the Kepler line this is. Now some people even pretend that GK100 and GK110 never existed and never will, but it does exist and will be released. Just because it may come several months later that does not change the fact that it will and it will be Kepler and it will be bigger than GK104. So by the fact that a faster/bigger Kepler chip is going to be released and was always planned to be released, GK104 is NOT, never was and never will be a high-end chip. it cannot be high-end, when there's something bigger on top of it. Period.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,813 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
I like numbers...
And I like reviews...
It gives me the right to post things and then demand validation of my thoughts.

Thanks for giving me an excuse to reply!! :laugh:

Okay, next question for Btarunr and W1zz.

WHEN IS THE FRICKIN' NDA UP?
That information in under NDA.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,243 (1.21/day)
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
what about if we run 7970 at same clocks ??
 
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
2,516 (0.71/day)
Location
Canada
System Name m1dg3t | DeathBox | HairPi 3
Processor 3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS | q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard Asrock z77e iTX | p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling Custom Water | D-14 & HR-03gt | Passive HSF
Memory Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v | OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s) MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 | Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ | WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s) BenQ gw2750hm | 46" Sharp Quatron
Case BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d | Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s) Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 | Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply Ocz mXp700w | Ocz zx850w | Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks| Logitech G11
Software Win7 Home | Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate | Raspbian
Benchmark Scores Epeen!! Who needs epeen??
I like numbers...
And I like reviews...
It gives me the right to post things and then demand validation of my thoughts.

Thanks for giving me an excuse to reply!! :laugh:

Okay, next question for Btarunr and W1zz.

WHEN IS THE FRICKIN' NDA UP?
:roll:

NDA lift is 22nd of March IIRC and further reason why i don't FULLY believe/trust any of these released "stat's" ;)

Hayder Master said:
what about if we run 7970 at same clocks ??
If both card's were at same clock's i think 7970 would just barely pass (1% - 2%) it or they would be dead even.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,082 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Fixed the Battlefield 3 slide.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.70/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
3DMark11 Extreme - 52.3%
3DMark11 Performance - 41.4%
BF3 - 33%
Batman AC - 35.7%
COD MW3 - 10%
Heaven Benchmark - 33.2%
Lost Planet 2 - 34.4%

This is how much faster it is over the GTX 580. Not bad at all for the 'mainstream card'. But again, those clock speeds make a big diff.

Given that a 14% clock increase on a GTX580 Lightning resulted in a 10% 3DMark11 Performance score on this review (http://www.guru3d.com/article/msi-geforce-gtx-580-lightning-review/20) you could argue that a 'X' % clock increase gives a ~70% 'X' increase in performance.

So by default with nothing else considered the architecture explains 30% of it's improvement but it's higher clocks make up 70%. Or in laymans terms, more than 2/3 of the extra fps from the GTX 680 are due to higher clocks.

This is simple percentages here based on figures. Not opinions and not conjecture. I know folk will argue but I dont care, to me, the clocks make the biggest impact.

Need a good W1zz review to make it all clear.
So basically higher clocks are achieved with fairy dust and have nothing to do with architecture.

Hmm that's weird because isn't Nvidia the one with the Fairy girl and AMD the one with Ruby? How come did AMD get that fairy dust first and for so many generations?!??! :mad::cool:
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,423 (1.99/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
a) It looks like a mid-range chip and is called like a mid-range chip, but it was all part of a covert plan to confuse people. (And badly loose the high-end to AMD, had Tahiti performed as it should -> comparably as well as Pitcairn)

b) it looks like a mid-range chip and is called like a mid-range chip, because it IS a mid-range chip.
Yup.

GF 104 = GTX 460
GF 100 = oven, I mean GTX 480
GF 114 = GTX 560
GF 110 = GTX 580
GK 104 = GTX 660 whoops GTX 680
GK 100 or 110 = GTX 680 whoops GTX 780?

So basically higher clocks are achieved with fairy dust and have nothing to do with architecture.

Hmm that's weird because isn't Nvidia the one with the Fairy girl and AMD the one with Ruby? How come did AMD get that fairy dust first and for so many generations?!??!
Always so feisty Ben :rolleyes: Process shrinks allow faster clocks due to all the power hoo ha that happens at lower scales. I can't explain that in tech terms but i know it's a facet of process shrinking up to logical point. I know the architecture is different but if 40nm allowed 1GHz clocks we'd be seeing far lower improvements.

It's all moot anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing the pricing and then I can decide what to get until GK100/110 comes out :cool:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,243 (1.21/day)
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
If both card's were at same clock's i think 7970 would just barely pass (1% - 2%) it or they would be dead even.

and if booth of them but them on max overclock without voltage increase i think 7970 will rock.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,082 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Top