• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GTX 680 Generally Faster Than HD 7970: New Benchmarks

Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
2,116 (0.42/day)
System Name Not named
Processor Intel 8700k @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Assassin II
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair LPX 3000mhz CL15
Video Card(s) Zotac 1080 Ti AMP EXTREME
Storage Samsung 960 PRO 512GB
Display(s) 24" Dell IPS 1920x1200
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Watt Fully Modular
im thinking competitive. Nvidia did release something say they were a bit surprised with hd7xxx series. They thought AMD would have released something better.
How does that make sense. Nvidia would have spent a huge amount of resources and money developing their high end chip, then when they see what ATI has they just go "Oh.... well lets just not continue the work flow and waste millions of dollars instead of stomping out the competition".

If you're going to talk about being competitive, at least get a business background.
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,224 (3.48/day)
Location
Longmont, CO
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 8700k
Motherboard MSi Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360 & 6x Corsair LL120s
Memory G. Skill Trident RGB 32GB 4x8GB @ 3866mhz 16-16-16-36
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samung 970 EVO 250GB (OS), Samsung 970 EVO 1TB (Games)
Display(s) Dell S3220DGF 32" 1440p Freesync 2 (G-Sync) HDR 165Hz - Curved
Case Lian Li PC-011D
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1220 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Glorious Model O w/ Hyper X Mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
For the love of <your god here>, why do people keep bringing up nV saying they thought AMD would have released something better? If you are mentally challenged, I apologise. Otherwise, the next time you feel like stating this, pause for just a moment and think how likely would it be for nV to make a statement which congratulated AMD on a great GPU.

....... If the penny still hasn't dropped, kindly don't reproduce.
people are saying it because thats what nvidia said. They also could have said nothing and continued on with their productions. But instead they did say something so why can';t we talk about it?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
734 (0.18/day)
Location
Golden, Colorado
System Name KAREN / EVA / GHOST
Processor Intel Core i7-950 / AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE / Core i5 3570k
Motherboard ASUS TUF Sabertooth X58 / DFI LP DK 790FXB-M2RSH / Asrock z77e-itx
Cooling Thermaltake Frio / Corsair Cooling™ Hydro Series H50 / Corsair Hydro Series H60
Memory Corsair Dominator 6GB DDR3 1600 / Corsair Dominator Quad2X4096-8500C5DF / G.SKILL Ripjaws Serie 1600
Video Card(s) XFX HD6950 CF unlocked /XFX HD5770 CF/ MSI R4890 Cyclone
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 60 WD Raptor X WD1500AHFD / Seagate Barracuda /Western Digital 80gb, Toshiba 1TB
Display(s) 2 Acer P215H 21.5 Widescreen / Acer S211HL 21.5 / HP 2009F 20inch
Case SILVERSTONE RAVEN RV02-BW / NZXT Phantom /Bitfenix Prodigy
Audio Device(s) On board / Philips MMS 321 - PC multimedia speakers
Power Supply Ultra X3 ULT40311 1000W / Cosair CMPSU-750TX 750W/ CORSAIR Gaming Series GS700 700W
Software Windows 7 64 bit / Windows 7 64 bit / Windows 7 64 bit
Long as with this news the price comes down on the 7970 I can care less that the 680 didn't blow away the 7970. Will be getting one or two 7970's any way.
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.69/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
1. If it was already competitive to begin with, why not release it simultaneously with 7970?, why take 2.5 months?
Because it didn't take 2.5 months to release it. It took them years, just like it took AMD years to create and release Tahiti. Chips are ready when they are, not even one minute earlier. If you want to speculate, Nvidia was probably going to (trying to) release GK100 when 28nm was ready, which is when Tahiti launched and had GK104 ready for 2-3 months later, just like Pitcairn came later and just like it has happened with mid-range cards for ages. GK100 was not ready, so it was most probably cancelled or they delayed it to make another respin, but instead of delaying every other chip like they did with Fermi, they decided to push GK100 release and make it the last one in the series and GK104 just continued on its schedule which happens to make it launch now.

PS: It doesn't take 2.5 months to increase clocks. And 2.5 months is not nearly enough to make any change besides that. GK104 is just what it ought to be.

EDIT: And the "we exected more from AMD" comment is probably closely related to the scenario above. GK100 was not ready, they had to make a decision and decided to make it last instead of delaying the entire lineup again, like I said. This means they decided and were ready to loose the high-end momentarily and release their performance part to try and take the market "hole" between Pitcairn and Tahiti, which they probably thought would be bigger (they know at least die sizes for sure), because that's the most profitable market segment anyway.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,335 (1.37/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name STEAMBOX | GAMECUBE | EQC (Everyday Quad Core)
Processor i5 4590@3.7Ghz |i7 3770K@4Ghz -|- Athlon 5350@2.52Ghz
Motherboard GA-B85N PHOENIX | Asrock Z77E-ITX | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Stock | Antec Kuhler 620 | Reeven Vanxie
Memory 2x4GB ADATA XPG 1600Mhz | 2x4GB Kingston 1866Mhz -|- 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix@1920Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 480 Nitro | Sapphire RX 480 w/Accelero Mono Plus | HD 8400 @ 720Mhz (IGP)
Storage LiteON 128GB mSATA+3TB Seagate | Seagate 1TBxSamung 64GB SSD (Intel RST) | Kingston v300 240GB
Display(s) Daewoo 49" 1080p | ASUS PA248Q 1920x1200 IPS
Case Corsair 250D | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Acteck Fiji
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 | Silverstone SFX-450 | 200w mini FLEX PSU
Software Windows 10 64bit
There is no Turks replacement this time around so, taking that into consideration, how can we know that Cape Verde wasn't really meant to replace Turks but then, when TSMC starts to show problems with 28nm, AMD decides to adjust tiers (Cape Verde -> 7600 to 7700, Pitcairn -> 7700 to 7800, etc). Kinda how they had to scale back FX speeds to improve yields (remember that the FX had a targeted speed of >4Ghz). For all we know AMD was having the same problems nVidia has with GK100 and so launched a mid range part as high end.

Anyway, the only truths so far is that nVidia will launch the GK104 as GTX680 and price it accordingly. This generation won't see a price/performance improvement from either company :banghead:
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.86/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
Anyway, the only truths so far is that nVidia will launch the GK104 as GTX680 and price it accordingly. This generation won't see a price/performance improvement from either company
Depends. Those who paid 500$ at the end of 2010 for the best card (GTX580) will have to pay 50$ more for 20% more perf in the case of the 7970 and probably 30% more perf for the GTX680. We know the 7970 overclocks well and the performence scales very well and we should expect the same from the GTX680 so that performance increase can reach 50%.

While we don't know what NV will bring in lower segments as price/perf goes we do know that AMD offers the same perf for the money as the 6000 series with the 7770/7870/7850
 

Benetanegia

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.69/day)
Location
Reaching your left retina.
There is no Turks replacement this time around so, taking that into consideration, how can we know that Cape Verde wasn't really meant to replace Turks but then, when TSMC starts to show problems with 28nm, AMD decides to adjust tiers (Cape Verde -> 7600 to 7700, Pitcairn -> 7700 to 7800, etc). Kinda how they had to scale back FX speeds to improve yields (remember that the FX had a targeted speed of >4Ghz). For all we know AMD was having the same problems nVidia has with GK100 and so launched a mid range part as high end.
We know that Tahiti is AMD's high-end because of the same signs we know GK104 is mid-range. First of all the codename, which was leaked along the rest of the lineup several months ago, earlier than TSMC problems arised. And secondly the die size which is similar to Cayman and Cypress, while Pitcairn is similar to Barts and slightly bigger than Juniper. And finally memory controler width is that of a high-end card. A new gen mid-range card would never have a wider memory bus than previous gen high-end.

Turks replacement is really Cape Verde despite the names of cards. Again because die size is the same, and same memory width, etc. Remember that HD6700 was just a rebranded Juniper, while it was really Turks that should/could have been called HD6700 and now HD7600 is a rebranded Turks.

While we don't know what NV will bring in lower segments as price/perf goes we do know that AMD offers the same perf for the money as the 6000 series with the 7770/7870/7850
And that's why it sucks. New generations have always brought significantly better perf/$ (usually close to 2x) than previous gens when they launched and now they are only matching it. Of course part of the problem is also that GTX500 and HD6000 are priced virtually the same as when they launched 15 months ago. It's a clear sign of price fixing to me, even if e-mails have not been exchanged. Legally punishable? I don't think so and I know we are not entitled to better perf/$ when we want it, but IMO they better treat customers better because people will not support that behavior too long, just to play console ports, be them XB360/PS3 ports or XB720/PS4 ports.
 
Last edited:

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,652 (2.03/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
This man:



is taking AMD in new directions. He's making a top tier product (7970) and pricing it accordingly. Many people see the inflated price of something and assign it a higher value. If someone tried to sell you a ferrari for $5000 you;d want to know what was wrong with it. The converse is true (unfortunately). Items with high cost are often perceived (sometimes erroneously) as 'prestige' products. Face it, many sad people brag about their 'expensive' this or that.

Back to that goofy guy Rory. He's making a statement with 7970 prices by drawing a line in the sand and saying, "we're that good and you'll pay for the privilege".

Meanwhile, this man:



is using the price of the 7970 to position his product against. It's not price fixing. It's making sure he sells his item at the competitors price point while delivering (possibly) a better product (at stock values). By pricing the same and selling as "the best single gpu ever!" (which guaranteed NV PR will) they will get sales by making the 7970 look like a worse option.

Who makes more money? Nvidia of course because the card they were meant release:



is late to the:



I'm done.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.86/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
By pricing the same and selling as "the best single gpu ever!" (which guaranteed NV PR will) they will get sales by making the 7970 look like a worse option.
Don't know if you noticed but this has changed to:

"The fastest, most efficient GPU ever built"
 

Irocing

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
41 (0.01/day)
Location
AZ (Area 52)
System Name Works For Me
Processor I7 930 Lapped
Motherboard Asus P6X58D-E
Cooling 3 Rads- 600.5 ST XT-MR-MCP 355
Memory Crucial 3x2 1600@1723
Video Card(s) Sapphire 7970 OC Edition 1250/1650 1.200v Stable
Storage Crucia 128 SSD Boot/ WD 640 Sata3 Storage
Display(s) Sammy 1200x1920 26"
Case CM 690 11 Adv Swiss Cheezed
Audio Device(s) CL Titanium Bose 2.1
Power Supply CM 850W Modular Gold
Software Win 7 HE
Benchmark Scores 4.51 HT ON 1.41 Stable 24/7 Run 4.3 Normally
Don't know if you noticed but this has changed to:

"The fastest, most efficient GPU ever built"
LOL

Sounds like thier playing with words.

Does that mean fastest as to efficiency or the fastest-fastest:laugh:

Later;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
1,169 (0.39/day)
Location
Arcadia
System Name Xeon build / Main Rig
Processor Intel Xeon x5650 @ 4.2Ghz with HT / Xeon E5 1620 @4.3 Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T Deluxe v2 socket 1366 / Asus P9X79 Pro socket 2011
Cooling Thermalright Archon +Ty 140mm|Fans : 2 front-1top-1rear-1bottom/ Swiftech H140x
Memory 16gb DDR3 1600mhz Kingstone Hyper x Quad Channel / 16gb DDR3 1600MHZ Patriot Viper 3
Video Card(s) Sapphire hd 7950 3gb Boost edition dual fan X / EVGA 1080 Ti iCX FTW3
Storage Kingstone AV400ssd 120gb + Seagate B 2Tb + WD green 1tb + WD green 3tb + WD red 3tb + Seagate B 4tb
Display(s) AOC E2460S 24" 1080p 60hz 1ms / LG 32UK550B 32" UHD 4K HDR 10 with Freesync (Wasabi Mango died )
Case Enermax Phoenix / Fractal Design Arc midi
Audio Device(s) SoundMaxHD+5.1 BHT1100 BLUESKY,Fiio E10 Olympus+SuperluxHD668b,Superlux E205 on an Mic Arm.
Power Supply Sharkoon WPM Gold Zero 650W semi modular / Thermaltake Toughpower xt 775W semi modular
Mouse Generic Mice / Corsair M90
Keyboard Generic Keyboard / Microsoft WK600
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Nah, you asking about benchmarking 680 and 7970 at same mhz core and memory, and you called 1006mhz 680 is overclocked. According to previews news, 1006mhz is the GTX 680 base clock, and turbo clock is 1058mhz. So, if you still asking about benchmark with same core clock & memory, It's like comparing 880mhz HD6970 with 880mhz GTX 570, is that fair enough for you?
you have to make example with a 6970 vs gtx 580 not a a gtx 570,but why they dont make the benchmark with same clock on the 7970? this is what i wanna know ,nvidia make the "stock" clore at 1000mhz after amd comes out with preoc card with 1000mhz = its same like make a benchmark with an oc card vs stock clock card, if you are NVIDIAFANBOY its not my fault, i wanna see real benchmark with the card out not make from nvidia with stupid result manipolated,is like the benchmark making from amd with the fx series vs the first 6 core intel , please use the mind not the eyes for think is true only thing you see
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.86/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
you have to make example with a 6970 vs gtx 580 not a a gtx 570,but why they dont make the benchmark with same clock on the 7970? this is what i wanna know ,nvidia make the "stock" clore at 1000mhz after amd comes out with preoc card with 1000mhz = its same like make a benchmark with an oc card vs stock clock card, if you are NVIDIAFANBOY its not my fault, i wanna see real benchmark with the card out not make from nvidia with stupid result manipolated,is like the benchmark making from amd with the fx series vs the first 6 core intel , please use the mind not the eyes for think is true only thing you see
I'll try to make it very simple for you. Wait for the real benchmarks, they are not so far, next week on the 22nd. It's not your fault you can't understand that the stock clock for the GTX680 is that from those benchmarks and from other countless leaks. It is Nvidia's fault.
 

Irocing

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
41 (0.01/day)
Location
AZ (Area 52)
System Name Works For Me
Processor I7 930 Lapped
Motherboard Asus P6X58D-E
Cooling 3 Rads- 600.5 ST XT-MR-MCP 355
Memory Crucial 3x2 1600@1723
Video Card(s) Sapphire 7970 OC Edition 1250/1650 1.200v Stable
Storage Crucia 128 SSD Boot/ WD 640 Sata3 Storage
Display(s) Sammy 1200x1920 26"
Case CM 690 11 Adv Swiss Cheezed
Audio Device(s) CL Titanium Bose 2.1
Power Supply CM 850W Modular Gold
Software Win 7 HE
Benchmark Scores 4.51 HT ON 1.41 Stable 24/7 Run 4.3 Normally
All I want to know is how much OC headroom is left on it from the base clock?

Am Sure benching in the next few weeks are going to bring that out.
If clocked out of the box, Not going to be any different than some of these
Non Ref spin off cards that come out after first releases that can't go any higher
on average as the Ref cards.

A few cards Like Mars and Asus differ in better components ect to do it.

Getting ready to pull the trigger from my CF 5770's, But going to make sure as
to the results between them.
Already have two strikes against them as to Mem and Bits.

We'll see:rolleyes:

Later;)
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
61 (0.02/day)
System Name Zargana's antiquity
Processor AMD FX 8370 (Stock)
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990 FX (V.1)
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 240mm
Memory KINGSTON 8GB (2 x 4GB) HyperX T1 PC3-12800 DDR3 1600MHz
Video Card(s) XFX RX 480 GTR (Stock)
Storage Samsung SSD 850 Pro 256gb and 2 x 500gb Seagate 7200 rpm
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster T220
Case Thermaltake Suppressor F51
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Platinum Fatal1ty Champion Series
Power Supply SUPERFLOWER LEADEX 80 PLUS PLATINUM BLACK 850W
Mouse Genius Gila Gaming Mouse
Keyboard Logitech G810 Orion
Benchmark Scores Time Spy GPU @1425 Score= 4251 - Temp Max: 73 Fire Strike GPU@1425 Score= 9123 - Temp Max: 70
I would to say:

AMD and Nvidia changed the price policy.

Did you see any price cut at nvidia side after release AMD 7 series? If your answer is simply no, then you cant expect the same from AMD for 7 series. (I hope Nvidia proves me wrong.)

My guess is the price for mid-range gpu will be arround 550 and for the high-end 650$ and more.

The new pricing policy for both of the firms is:
Produce for low price and sell it higher. With the new policy they dont drop the pricing but they put the own high-end card models for sale at the same price or higher price from the opponents cards. (i mean the MSRP)

example: When nvidia has faster gpu: Lets say it costs 50$. If AMD have a higher performance gpu in they hands they will price it 75$. And Nvidia makes a new gpu and is faster then first duo and priced around 100$. Then both of the firms will continue to selling they products without changing the price policy.

So this is a win-win policy for both of the firms.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,311 (0.70/day)
Location
Essex Jct, VT
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 Aurorus Elite
Cooling Stock
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / Samsung EVO 860 500GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) AOC G2590FX
Case NZXT H500 Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
When it comes to price, it may be worth noting that at release the HD6970 was on par for the GTX480, and they still priced it $80 lower. AMD generally had a policy of pricing their similar performing cards just below Nvidia's. When you look at the 7xxx series they kind of just made a pricing scheme that went 250-350-450-550, regardless of how it performed with comparable products available.

I don't really plan on getting a GTX680, I might go for a 660 or 670(Ti?), but $550 is steep for a GPU in my mind.
 

Irocing

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
41 (0.01/day)
Location
AZ (Area 52)
System Name Works For Me
Processor I7 930 Lapped
Motherboard Asus P6X58D-E
Cooling 3 Rads- 600.5 ST XT-MR-MCP 355
Memory Crucial 3x2 1600@1723
Video Card(s) Sapphire 7970 OC Edition 1250/1650 1.200v Stable
Storage Crucia 128 SSD Boot/ WD 640 Sata3 Storage
Display(s) Sammy 1200x1920 26"
Case CM 690 11 Adv Swiss Cheezed
Audio Device(s) CL Titanium Bose 2.1
Power Supply CM 850W Modular Gold
Software Win 7 HE
Benchmark Scores 4.51 HT ON 1.41 Stable 24/7 Run 4.3 Normally
When it comes to price, it may be worth noting that at release the HD6970 was on par for the GTX480, and they still priced it $80 lower. AMD generally had a policy of pricing their similar performing cards just below Nvidia's. When you look at the 7xxx series they kind of just made a pricing scheme that went 250-350-450-550, regardless of how it performed with comparable products available.

I don't really plan on getting a GTX680, I might go for a 660 or 670(Ti?), but $550 is steep for a GPU in my mind.
Agree, $550.00 is very Steep for a Vid card.

In my case, I'm about 3 gens back even though CF helps a bunch. I think its time and
sure couldn't do this on a yearly basis.

Way I do it, Is get the strongest single card for the best price at the time.
Then Double up when and if it starts to fall behind as to what you want it to do.
And also getting the 2nd card usually alot cheaper.
Can usually stretch it to a 2 or 2 1/2 year cycle.

Later:)
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,178 (0.28/day)
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
The end result is, for the vast majority of gamers with 1 screen, the 7970 or 680 will be more than enough to run new games on max settings for the next 18 months at least.

You cant go wrong with either card.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
30,428 (6.52/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
The end result is, for the vast majority of gamers with 1 screen, the 7970 or 680 will be more than enough to run new games on max settings for the next 18 months at least.

You cant go wrong with either card.
your about the only Aussie here that makes sense actually. Its user preference honestly.
 

INSTG8R

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
6,031 (1.07/day)
Location
Canuck in Norway
System Name Hellbox 3.0(same case new guts)
Processor i7 4790K 4.6
Motherboard Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1
Cooling TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)AC Cuplex Kryos CPU Block/Noctua
Memory 2x8GB Corsair Vengance Pro 2400
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5700XT Nitro+
Storage WD Caviar Black SATA 3 1TB x2 RAID 0 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue
Display(s) Samsung CGH70 27” 1440 144hz Freesync 2 HDR
Case TT Kandalf L.C.S.
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050W 80+ Gold
Mouse G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard G19s
Software Win 10 Pro x64
All I can make out of this is that it appears NV saw that there "mid range" chip could compete with AMD's top chip with a "little" overclocking. What I see is they overclocked the snot out of it to get it past the 7970 and bingo they have their "high end" card without needing to worry about the fate of the GK100 for awhile.
I have a sneaking suspicion there won't be alot of headroom left with these chips.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
30,428 (6.52/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
All I can make out of this is that it appears NV saw that there "mid range" chip could compete with AMD's top chip with a "little" overclocking. What I see is they overclocked the snot out of it to get it past the 7970 and bingo they have their "high end" card without needing to worry about the fate of the GK100 for awhile.
I have a sneaking suspicion there won't be alot of headroom left with these chips.
Your Sayin NVs chips right?
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
123 (0.04/day)
So I overclocked my system with out voltage tweaks and I could have pushed harder, but all I did was go into my Asus bios chose EZ mode and turn the sliders in the Catalyst to the right. This is the result I get with 12.3rc drivers, and I got to say the jump in performance since launch is pretty big here. I mean in those slieds above the fella is getting low 7k score. With a much better CPU at 5ghz, so not sure how much we can trust that slide. Now there is no doubt the 680 stock for stock will be faster than the 7970 that be just silly.


http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2983294

Enjoy :rockout:
 

INSTG8R

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
6,031 (1.07/day)
Location
Canuck in Norway
System Name Hellbox 3.0(same case new guts)
Processor i7 4790K 4.6
Motherboard Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1
Cooling TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)AC Cuplex Kryos CPU Block/Noctua
Memory 2x8GB Corsair Vengance Pro 2400
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5700XT Nitro+
Storage WD Caviar Black SATA 3 1TB x2 RAID 0 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue
Display(s) Samsung CGH70 27” 1440 144hz Freesync 2 HDR
Case TT Kandalf L.C.S.
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050W 80+ Gold
Mouse G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard G19s
Software Win 10 Pro x64
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.86/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
Top