970 evo plus 1tb RND4K performance

[roco smith]

Hello i ve just got a 970 evo plus 1 tb for my pc and used crystaldiskmark for the performances. But my RND4K performance shows low i think. When i looked on net i saw 1871 / 2050 on RND4K where mine is only 663/578. I wud be happy if u tell me what cause this plz, thanks.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
I wouldn't worry about it you're exceeding read/ write spec's

 

[roco smith]

Hi,
I wouldn't worry about it you're exceeding read/ write spec's

I had microsoft driver installled. This is after installing samsung driver, still low tho.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
First test you posted settings are different
Second is on default settings testing 1GiB not 16Gib.

 

[roco smith]

Hi,
First test you posted settings are different
Second is on default settings testing 1GiB not 16Gib.

When i benchmarked it the same version 7.0.0 i saw on net it s close numbers now. only difference is it was writing Q32T1 on the first one under RND4K and this one it writes Q32T16 , dont know the difference tho.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
All I test and verify is the main read/ write speeds, if it exceeds 3500/ 3300 in this case I'm happy because not a lot of ssd's can do that

 

[roco smith]

My 5 days ago SEQ1M Q1T1 Write benchmark is 3060s but now the belowe picture is it s about 1600s mh/s. Disk was empty on first benchmark and it s %25 full on second. Shows something wrong with ssd? Also on the first picture left from crystaldiskinfo it says ''number of error information log entries'' raw values 22. That write speed decrease is something to do with this? I wud be happy if u help plz, thanks.

 

[pony66]

dassan,​

What does windows see, run ( winsat diskformal ) in admin powershell, just wondering.

Are you assuming that q32t1 is iops, and think you should see the iops for it, ?.

 

[8BitZ80]

My 5 days ago SEQ1M Q1T1 Write benchmark is 3060s but now the belowe picture is it s about 1600s mh/s. Disk was empty on first benchmark and it s %25 full on second. Shows something wrong with ssd? Also on the first picture left from crystaldiskinfo it says ''number of error information log entries'' raw values 22. That write speed decrease is something to do with this? I wud be happy if u help plz, thanks.

View attachment 186559

Your drive was well within spec when it was empty, so why worry about it? That's when all SSDs perform at their peak, so it's doing just fine. I don't take CrystalDiskMark results on a used SSD as gospel mainly because they're so highly inconsistent. If you re-run the SEQ1M tests you'll find they can fluctuate hundreds of MB/s even if you're doing back-to-back runs.

I filled up my 1TB 970 Evo is around 65% full right now (it has two partitions hence the 195GiB capacity) and the RND4K speeds are a fraction of what you're getting. Nothing out of the ordinary.

 

[roco smith]

Your drive was well within spec when it was empty, so why worry about it? That's when all SSDs perform at their peak, so it's doing just fine. I don't take CrystalDiskMark results on a used SSD as gospel mainly because they're so highly inconsistent. If you re-run the SEQ1M tests you'll find they can fluctuate hundreds of MB/s even if you're doing back-to-back runs.

I filled up my 1TB 970 Evo is around 65% full right now (it has two partitions hence the 195GiB capacity) and the RND4K speeds are a fraction of what you're getting. Nothing out of the ordinary.

View attachment 186562

The first picture i showed on left from crystaldiskinfo it says ''number of error information log entries'' raw values 22. It s not normal right? Tho i made a full diagnostic scan on samsung magician it didnt show anything bad.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,