• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

HD Tach Benchmarks

heres my screenie:D
 

Attachments

  • hdtach1.JPG
    hdtach1.JPG
    137.9 KB · Views: 514
Are those last two screenies posted from single HDD's?
 
how is this?

I have 3 300g 7.10s in a stripe, pretty awesome:roll:
 
sry forgot pic
 
I'd like to see it. Hurry up and post it man - I'm bored :(
 
here you go
 

Attachments

  • Owned.jpg
    Owned.jpg
    106.6 KB · Views: 592
Looks great, but that burst speed is messed up. That's the second one we've seen here that was like that. Must be a glitch.
 
Here's mine. Shame about the 8MB buffer.
 

Attachments

  • Hdtach.JPG
    Hdtach.JPG
    101.3 KB · Views: 416
very nice crazyfish 200mb Avg :O I wan lol but I dont want to pay for a raid configurer.. max my mobo is 2 in raid.
 
it's a glitch chewy ;)
 
it is not a glitch, the Seagate 7.10's have native command queing and I enabled volume write-back cache which increases performance :rockout:
 
how did you do that, so i can try on mine

note to self: sys specs need to be update
 
Yes, you can go in the device manager and go into the properties for the volume or drive under "disks" and go to the policies tab, should be an option to enable the write-back cache if you drive supports it. If you have an Intel array you can use the intel storage manager to enable the write-back cache by right clicking on the volume and selecting that option
 
Yes, you can go in the device manager and go into the properties for the volume or drive under "disks" and go to the policies tab, should be an option to enable the write-back cache if you drive supports it. If you have an Intel array you can use the intel storage manager to enable the write-back cache by right clicking on the volume and selecting that option


cool man, it says a power failure can make me lose my data.. there was something like this in the Vista tweaks thread but I cant go cherck it out I must go to sleep.. I didnt think it could improve performace much.. what HD's are you using?

Edit if your results are real (they prob not but what do I know) than you have the best avg read time on tpu by the looks of it... heres # atm 1. dumuzi =176.8mb/s - (4X 320GB Seagate RAID 0 - QuadDisk Stripe RAID 0 Array).

Edit #2

I cant do it with my raid controller, I also heard that I wouldnt notice huge improvments when I was thinking about getting a back-up power supply just so I could enable it.
 
Last edited:
i have that thing turned on :)
hdtach.jpg



/\ seagate 250gb 7200.10 16mb cache

edit:
nvm, confused qa thing
 
Last edited:
i have that thing turned on :)
hdtach.jpg



/\ seagate 250gb 7200.10 16mb cache

edit:
the glitch is only on the lower graphic, the top (big one) seems fine with 243

Check out the reviews on newegg, as you can see some other people are having the same read speeds, and 64mb read speed is about right when you have a single drive, but its much faster when you have a stripe array
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148140
 
:D Yes I have three of these in RAID 0
 
Yes, you can go in the device manager and go into the properties for the volume or drive under "disks" and go to the policies tab, should be an option to enable the write-back cache if you drive supports it. If you have an Intel array you can use the intel storage manager to enable the write-back cache by right clicking on the volume and selecting that option

many thanks for that one m8, look at the results of before and after:
 

Attachments

  • hd tach.JPG
    hd tach.JPG
    102.8 KB · Views: 496
  • hdtach.JPG
    hdtach.JPG
    93.3 KB · Views: 432
awesome :roll: , happy to help out
 
Back
Top