• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel 10 nm Ice Lake is Alive: Server and Desktop Support Added to the Linux Kernel

AleksandarK

Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
1,497 (0.86/day)
There were many rumors about Intel's 10 nm CPUs, many of them indicating that Intel will not manufacture 10 nm CPUs for desktop users, due to the 10 nm manufacturing process being in a bad shape. Those rumors were later countered by Intel, claiming that 10 nm is doing very well on improving yields and that we will see desktop CPUs based on the new node very soon.

Thanks to the Linux kernel mailing list (LKML), we now know that support for Ice Lake desktop and server CPUs has been added. A Patch titled "Add more CPU model number for Ice Lake" has many details about variants of Ice Lake with names like Ice Lake X for server Xeon CPU, Ice Lake D for Xeon D CPUs, Ice Lake L for mobile, and regular Ice Lake for desktop series of CPUs. This confirms Intel's claims that Ice Lake is on its way to desktop and server users in the near future. Possible launch date on these CPUs would be sometime in 2020, when Xe graphics cards are launched in July/August, so Intel could bundle both processors on the same 10 nm node.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,960 (0.62/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X / Ryzen 7 2600X / AM3 Athlon 645 unlocked to 6 core @ 3.6+GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / AMD Wraith / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 710 (PhysX)/ GT 730 / HD 5670
Storage NVMe x 3 + SATA SSDs, SATA HDDs / Samsung 256GB NVMe + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) 1080p OC @ 75Hz / 19'' HP monitor + projector
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Seasonic 400W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard Spartan Gear / Natec / CoolerMaster
Software Windows 7 and 10
I guess after 4 years hitting that 10nm wall with their head, they are so dizzy, they think they are finally breaking the wall.

They should have chosen to move faster to 7nm, but nevermind. I like seeing AMD having plenty of time to fully recover. Only then we will have true duopoly in the market (which is not great, but much better than monopoly).
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
259 (0.07/day)
There's no mention of "-S" models, which is the actual "desktop line", and none of Intel roadmaps includes one for Ice Lake either, so the "desktop" probably means something else than most think
edit:
Intels next desktop chip should be Comet Lake next year followed by Rocket Lake, which supposedly has Xe-based graphics (possibly as separate die)
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
1,359 (0.23/day)
They should have chosen to move faster to 7nm
I'd guess that's easier said than done, and even easier said in hindsight.

I'm not defending Intel, I just think the development of a new process node is hard to speed up. Besides, I don't think Intel wants to take any risks with 7 nm.

There's no mention of "-S" models, which is the actual "desktop line", and none of Intel roadmaps includes one for Ice Lake either, so the "desktop" probably means something else than most think

Mind you, there's no INTEL_FAM6_COMETLAKE_S either...

Edit: I can't find any _S models listed.

Source: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/b...301faeebcd2cb3cd/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c

Code:
static const struct x86_cpu_desc isolation_ucodes[] = {
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL,         3, 0x0000001f),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_L,         1, 0x0000001e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_G,         1, 0x00000015),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X,         2, 0x00000037),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X,         4, 0x0000000a),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL,         4, 0x00000023),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_G,         1, 0x00000014),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         2, 0x00000010),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         3, 0x07000009),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         4, 0x0f000009),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         5, 0x0e000002),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X,         2, 0x0b000014),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,         3, 0x00000021),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,         4, 0x00000000),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_L,         3, 0x0000007c),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE,         3, 0x0000007c),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,         9, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,         9, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,        10, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,        11, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,        12, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        10, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        11, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        12, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        13, 0x0000004e),
    {}
};
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
1,137 (0.34/day)
Location
Artem S. Tashkinov
This commit means absolutely nothing. Tomorrow they may revert it.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,584 (0.89/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
This commit means absolutely nothing. Tomorrow they may revert it.
That's nonsense.
This is pretty much the strongest type of evidence we can have of an unreleased product at this time. Of course even Intel can't know for sure until they get the final stepping back from the factory, but this is evidence that they intend to release the product, and probably have early engineering samples for testing.

Compared to most of the source material for "news" in the tech press, with all kinds of BS pulled right out of thin air by garbage news sites or random YouTubers, this news is actually pretty solid stuff.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
1,137 (0.34/day)
Location
Artem S. Tashkinov
That's nonsense.
This is pretty much the strongest type of evidence we can have of an unreleased product at this time. Of course even Intel can't know for sure until they get the final stepping back from the factory, but this is evidence that they intend to release the product, and probably have early engineering samples for testing.

Compared to most of the source material for "news" in the tech press, with all kinds of BS pulled right out of thin air by garbage news sites or random YouTubers, these news are actually solid stuff.

Your comment and attitude are nonsense. I've been following Linux development since the mid-'90s when you were probably not yet born. Commits are commits. They are not an indication of any commitment or real product launches. Also, considering the fact that Ice Lake U CPUs are far and between and there are no parts which run faster than 3.9GHz, it takes a lot of wild imagination and belief to think that Intel has suddenly solved their 10nm node and are ready to launch CPUs which are undoubtly faster than Coffee Lake CPUs.

Slow down and calm down, dude, and stop talking from your ar*e. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
1,359 (0.23/day)
it takes a lot of wild imagination and belief to think that Intel has suddenly solved their 10nm node and are ready to launch CPUs which are undoubtly faster than Coffee Lake CPUs.
Nobody said anything about higher frequency. You did.
The 5775C didn't break any stock clock speed records for pretty much the same reason, but it still exists.
Remember the first 10 nm from last year, Cannon Lake? Max turbo was 3.2 GHZ on a low power 2C and disabled GPU. Ice Lake mobile is a big step forward and severs a purpose among laptops, it might do the same for desktops even if it's not a 9900K successor, Comet Lake will handle that (unfortunately).

when you were probably not yet born.
Slow down and calm down, dude, and stop talking from your ar*e. Thanks.
Easy now. You may be older, but you don't act like it. ;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,584 (0.89/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Your comment and attitude are nonsense. I've been following Linux development since mid 90s when you were probably not yet born.
Congratulations, you've already managed to embarrass yourself and prove you can't make a well formed argument, and have resorted to personal insults. Well done.
And P.S. I managed to learn coding in the mid 90s, turbo pascal if that rings any bells, so please stay civil and polite or go play somewhere else.

Commits are commits. They are not an indication of any commitment or real product launches.
If you read my post properly, you would have seen the answer to that, instead of rushing to insult.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
1,137 (0.34/day)
Location
Artem S. Tashkinov
Congratulations, you've already managed to embarrass yourself and prove you can't make a well formed argument, and have resorted to personal insults. Well done. And P.S. I managed to learn coding in the mid 90s, turbo pascal if that rings any bells, so please stay civil and polite or go play somewhere else.

If you read my post properly, you would have seen the answer to that, instead of rushing to insult.

Your comment contains zero facts yet you were talking as if you were damn sure about it. I didn't insult you, I was insulted by the level of confidence you had based on the three lines of code.

Intel promised 10nm based CPUs for 2015 (!!!) and now when year 2019 is almost over, we still don't have a working 10nm node. Base CPU clock rates for Ice Lake CPUs are just laughable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Lake_(microprocessor)

I don't know what you choose to believe in but I believe something when I see it. For previous nodes Intel at least used to show yet to be released products in advance - they haven't done that for their 10nm node. Nothing at all. If I'm writing shat, you can refer to it as "shat" pure and simple. And I won't say "someone has insulted me"- instead I will take note and won't try to behave like I'm the smartest soothsayer to ever exist.

If you are willing to speculate about new nodes and Intel uArchs go to Anandtech as I'm done here.

Speaking of embarrassment - I have nothing to be embarrassed about. I was honest and straightforward and I didn't try to make things up, unlike you. And you are still trying to defend your comment without providing a single fact - just speculation on top of speculation.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
259 (0.07/day)
I'd guess that's easier said than done, and even easier said in hindsight.

I'm not defending Intel, I just think the development of a new process node is hard to speed up. Besides, I don't think Intel wants to take any risks with 7 nm.



Mind you, there's no INTEL_FAM6_COMETLAKE_S either...

Edit: I can't find any _S models listed.

Source: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/b...301faeebcd2cb3cd/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c

Code:
static const struct x86_cpu_desc isolation_ucodes[] = {
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL,         3, 0x0000001f),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_L,         1, 0x0000001e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_G,         1, 0x00000015),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X,         2, 0x00000037),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X,         4, 0x0000000a),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL,         4, 0x00000023),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_G,         1, 0x00000014),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         2, 0x00000010),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         3, 0x07000009),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         4, 0x0f000009),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D,         5, 0x0e000002),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X,         2, 0x0b000014),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,         3, 0x00000021),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,         4, 0x00000000),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_L,         3, 0x0000007c),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE,         3, 0x0000007c),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,         9, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,         9, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,        10, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,        11, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L,        12, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        10, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        11, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        12, 0x0000004e),
    INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE,        13, 0x0000004e),
    {}
};
Apparently they use different letters there then, compared to the actual chip codenames in roadmaps (S for desktop, X for HEDT, U / Y for low power etc
That still doesn't change the roadmaps not including a desktop Ice Lake, unless they plan to bring it in 2022 or later.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,584 (0.89/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
We already know Intel have added driver support for upcoming Tiger Lake mobile and desktop parts, and that intel is intending to launch Ice Lake-X for HEDT. But the production volume and yields on 10nm+ remains to be seen. I would not be surprised if we see a lineup mixed with both 10nm and 14nm on the same platform, but if supplies remains limited, I hope Intel prioritizes 10nm wisely.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
964 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
We already know Intel have added driver support for upcoming Tiger Lake mobile and desktop parts, and that intel is intending to launch Ice Lake-X for HEDT. But the production volume and yields on 10nm+ remains to be seen. I would not be surprised if we see a lineup mixed with both 10nm and 14nm on the same platform, but if supplies remains limited, I hope Intel prioritizes 10nm wisely.

Sure that would make limited sense, low end 10nm+ chips to combat amd APUs, 14nm++ superclocked to stave off AMD 8c Zen for gaming.
Would match the laptop clusterfuck. So far the 10nn+ sunnycove architecture is "faster" better IPC but lacks clocks.

Just a reminder, linux patch notes have served as a notice of incoming products but not who they would be targeting or when they would be released.
Intel has slid 10nm 5 years and changed roadmaps every 3mo for the past 2yrs... Not enough salt in the ocean for something like this :)
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
1,113 (0.35/day)
System Name boomer--->zoomer not your typical millenial build
Processor i5-760 @ 3.8ghz + turbo ~goes wayyyyyyyyy fast cuz turboooooz~
Motherboard P55-GD80 ~best motherboard ever designed~
Cooling NH-D15 ~double stack thot twerk all day~
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix LP ~memory gone AWOL~
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 ~*~GOLDEN EDITION~*~ RAWRRRRRR
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo (OS X, *nix), 128GB Samsung 840 Pro (W10 Pro), 1TB SpinPoint F3 ~best in class
Display(s) ASUS VW246H ~best 24" you've seen *FULL HD* *1O80PP* *SLAPS*~
Case FT02-W ~the W stands for white but it's brushed aluminum except for the disgusting ODD bays; *cries*
Audio Device(s) A LOT
Power Supply 850W EVGA SuperNova G2 ~hot fire like champagne~
Mouse CM Spawn ~cmcz R c00l seth mcfarlane darawss~
Keyboard CM QF Rapid - Browns ~fastrrr kees for fstr teens~
Software integrated into the chassis
Benchmark Scores 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
Your comment contains zero facts yet you were talking as if you were damn sure about it. I didn't insult you, I was insulted by the level of confidence you had based on the three lines of code.

Intel promised 10nm based CPUs for 2015 (!!!) and now when year 2019 is almost over, we still don't have a working 10nm node. Base CPU clock rates for Ice Lake CPUs are just laughable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Lake_(microprocessor)

I don't know what you choose to believe in but I believe something when I see it. For previous nodes Intel at least used to show yet to be released products in advance - they haven't done that for their 10nm node. Nothing at all. If I'm writing shat, you can refer to it as "shat" pure and simple. And I won't say "someone has insulted me"- instead I will take note and won't try to behave like I'm the smartest soothsayer to ever exist.

If you are willing to speculate about new nodes and Intel uArchs go to Anandtech as I'm done here.

Speaking of embarrassment - I have nothing to be embarrassed about. I was honest and straightforward and I didn't try to make things up, unlike you. And you are still trying to defend your comment without providing a single fact - just speculation on top of speculation.
Can you point to an example of a Linux kernel commit by Intel indicating new processors that Intel later pulled and never released?

Because that’s your argument, and I don’t see any evidence here.

I have no horse in this race towards speculation, but I do think it’s important to play nice:toast:

Have fun out there!
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,926 (0.73/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
There's no mention of "-S" models, which is the actual "desktop line", and none of Intel roadmaps includes one for Ice Lake either, so the "desktop" probably means something else than most think
edit:
Intels next desktop chip should be Comet Lake next year followed by Rocket Lake, which supposedly has Xe-based graphics (possibly as separate die)

"Desktop" all in ones and quad core xeons...WHAT YEAR IS IT?

Maybe some glued together, terrible TDP, xeons, too.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,584 (0.89/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Sure that would make limited sense, low end 10nm+ chips to combat amd APUs, 14nm++ superclocked to stave off AMD 8c Zen for gaming.
Would match the laptop clusterfuck. So far the 10nn+ sunnycove architecture is "faster" better IPC but lacks clocks.
Intel haven't released any products on 10nm+ yet. Ice Lake-U/-Y is still on the first generation 10nm, the same as the nearly forgotten Cannon Lake.
Except for low-power laptops, it would make more sense to save the 10nm+ capacity for server and higher desktop models, as the 35-45W TDP latop CPUs does just fine on 14nm++ for now. It's easy to forget that Intel's 14nm++ have excellent yields and is quite a bit better than TSMC's and GloFo's 12/14/16nm nodes, and it's when you push clocks higher and get a lot of heat that 14nm++ starts to fall behind TSMC 7nm.

There are many who claim that Intel should give up 10nm and wait for 7nm, but they are just clueless. 7nm will start limited production in 2021, and will only be able to reach a majority of volume by late 2022 or 2023, at the earliest. Intel will launch their 10nm+ in 2020 and 10nm++ in 2021, and they have no option but to fix it. And there is technically no reason why they shouldn't be able to get similar results as TSMC's 7nm eventually. And if Sunny Cove provides a similar ~18% IPC gain for desktop and HEDT, but can only boost to ~4.5-4.6 GHz, it would still outperform a 5 GHz Coffee Lake.

As to your claim of "14nm++ superclocked to stave off AMD 8c Zen for gaming", that really doesn't make much sense;
Firstly, in games CPU performance only matters to the point where the CPU is no longer bottlenecking the GPU, and for current games and the i9-9900K, it's already faster than it needs to for most games, so pushing beyond 5 GHz isn't going to give a significant advantage over AMD.
Secondly, each hundred MHz beyond 5 GHz is going to cause significant increases in power requirements, I'm not even sure 14nm++ would be able to do that. Intel is much better off getting more of their cores to scale better on clock speed rather than pushing extreme clocks. Even "backporting" Sunny Cove to 14nm would make much more sense and perform much better than pushing Skylake beyond 5 GHz.
 
Top