Intel Core i5-10400F

[W1zzard]

A couple of my usage examples are using Nero video to manually strip out commercials from 1080 captured video of cable programming (and yes, there is a built-in process for this which should be perfect for automated testing), which I then use to burn to movies or multi-episode/multi-hour Blu-ray disks. I am interested in the encoding times, etc. as I usually do this as an overnight thing, and I'm wondering how such processes work on these newer chips. I have been watching/waiting especially with all the emphasis on the Intel side about building in optimized AVX512 encoding / decoding for playback etc. in the new chips.

First of all, thanks for the positive feedback. I think our video encoding tests for x264/x265 should be a good indicator of what to expect performance-wise. I like the Nero test idea, but it hasn't been updated since 2017. I feel like something with Adobe AfterEffects could be more useful to the general audience

 

[miss5tability]

sry but i dont believe in thoise gaming test, in almost every scenario 9400f beats 10400f 2666, but on what platform do u test 9400f? comon, tousand ppl on yt testing those cpu cant lie and 10400f even 2666 will outperform 9400f, and 9700k is worse than 8400 comon, u should write a fairy tails

 

[InVasMani]

sry but i dont believe in thoise gaming test, in almost every scenario 9400f beats 10400f 2666, but on what platform do u test 9400f? comon, tousand ppl on yt testing those cpu cant lie and 10400f even 2666 will outperform 9400f, and 9700k is worse than 8400 comon, u should write a fairy tails

Z170 because Intel is a lifestyle company.

 

[The red spirit]

sry but i dont believe in thoise gaming test, in almost every scenario 9400f beats 10400f 2666, but on what platform do u test 9400f? comon, tousand ppl on yt testing those cpu cant lie and 10400f even 2666 will outperform 9400f, and 9700k is worse than 8400 comon, u should write a fairy tails

Hyperthreading isn't always beneficial, therefore you see the difference.