Further evidence why Intel dropped the ball with Rocket Lake.
"If we assume that you can find both the Ryzen 9 5900X and Core i9-11900K close to recommended pricing, Intel really missed the mark with the 11900K's suggested pricing. As the saying goes, there are no bad products, just bad pricing. And the Core i9-11900K definitely has bad pricing.
For gamers, the Core i9-11900K would have to show a more appreciable advantage to justify its price tag and power consumption — the performance deltas are so slim you likely wouldn't notice much difference with current-gen mainstream GPUs, especially at heightened fidelity settings. That makes it hard to justify the Core i9-11900K's $539 price tag."
Intel pulls an AMD from years ago.
W1zzard: "The Ryzen 5 5600X is still faster than the i5-11600K—both are six cores and Intel even has a 300 MHz clock advantage, which shows how impressive AMD's Zen 3 improvements are. Due to the good pricing of the i5-11600K, there really aren't that many competitors besides the Ryzen 5 5600X. The Ryzen 7 5800X costs $450, for 20% faster performance, which definitely is not worth it."
I think your comment sir, is presumptive and unnecessary. AMD 5600X CPUs can be found for less than $450, if one puts in the legwork, but this opinion is YOUR opinion. If someone wants to pay more than MSRP for an AMD then more power to them. Thus, your comment should be constructed in a IMHO fashion, not as a statement that is true in all cases as I may think the AMD CPU, even above MSRP, is or greater value for me than you may think.
"Priced at $275, the Core i5-11600K is sitting at an excellent price point. AMD is currently enjoying their leadership status
and has jacked up prices across the board, and they're also suffering from TSMC's limited 7 nanometer production capacity."
Again, AMD did not, as far as I have found, jack up the prices, e-tailers and retailers are raising prices. Get your facts straight sir. Did they raise the price for a 6 core part? Yes. Is the cost justified? Depends on who you ask and why. Is the performance in line with the price increase to $299? For a speedy gaming CPU, it isn't that bad, Intel charged an arm and a leg for high performance years ago. Ultimately, it comes down to how much people are willing to pay for the performance that they get from any one CPU. 5600X CPUs are flying off the shelves, but if there were a glut of them available, then I'm sure AMD would slash the price to move product. There is a balance to the market and if you miss the mark, you miss the mark and make an adjustment. AMD didn't miss the mark, they are offering strong performance for more than we whiny PC enthusiasts want to pay for high end PC hardware.