1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7 930 Slated for Q1 2010

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 29, 2009.

  1. shevanel

    shevanel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,464 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Location:
    Leesburg, FL
    i went from e6600 to q9550.. then q9550 to i7 920 and would do it again and again and again.

    nothing better than having a system that will do whatever you need it to when you need it to. perfection.
     
  2. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,684 (1.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    402
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    do you actually notice a difference from the q9550? like honestly. I've only ever thought that i7 was necessary only if you were a benchmarking person or you had a high end SLI/xfire config.
     
  3. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    23,553 (5.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,585
    I'm content with my X3370(Q9650), no need to upgrade to an i7 that will show little performance improvement over my current setup. Hell, I just bought an X3220(Q6600) for my other rig.

    I'll wait for the 32-nm Quads, and yes they will exist, it would be sill if they didn't. Once Intel moves to the 32-nm, they will release an entire range using 32-nm. The quads might be one of the 6-cores with 2 cores disabled, but I don't care, they will overclock like mad and be super cheap(relatively)...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU
  4. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,573 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    864
    I like that this will replace the 920's price point and keep the low end X58/1366 lineup VERY strong, and for the record, I consider a 920 D0 to already be on par with the mightly Q6600 (in terms of legendary status), albeit a lot more expensive to adopt, so far less adopters.

    I don't regret for a second going i7, even if I use a scrap of it's power @ 4.2ghz, I just love having a system that is this damn quick, and I know I can just keep throwing top end gfx cards in it and not have to worry, not for a while yet.
     
  5. InTeL-iNsIdE Guest

    Not everyone here only games, a lot of i7 users do a shit load of encoding aswell, now tell me a x3 or a c2q can compete with an i7. btw, that wasnt a dig if it sounded like one :toast:

    Heck I barely use mine, but the power is there for when I do sometimes, not too mention I am part of an elite few who own i7 :laugh: I mean few as in % compared to all the computers in the world, i7 maybe counts for 1% of the processors ?? :rockout: and I likes looking at my 8 threads in taskmgr :D
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. Paulieg The Mad Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    11,961 (3.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,055
    Location:
    Wherever I can find the iron.
    Well, once again it depends what you do. If you are cunching with your rigs, it's really nice to have 8 threads working for you. ;)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. T3kl0rd

    T3kl0rd

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    496 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    This is awesome news. I wanted to get a 920 @ Micro Center for $199, hopefully they will have the 930 in 2010 at that price as well. This CPU will be relevant for 5 years down the road and will max your expensive GPU's when other CPUs can't. :rockout:
     
  8. shevanel

    shevanel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,464 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Location:
    Leesburg, FL
    You bet I can. I can load whatever I want and not have to worry about choking my machine out. I don't have to exit background aps to free up resources. I can pause a game and minimize it only to forget it is still open because it feels like it's not. I might not encode video everyday but at least when I can I can still do 20 other things without the machine even skipping a beat.

    Plus, it's friggin fun to show friends. I'll use media player classic and select open individual window for each movie and open up 100+ videos that all play simulataneoulsy @ 60% cpu usage... yeah that's useless but at least I know I don't have a machine that has tons of flaws and limitations. It's all preference and expectations really.
     
  9. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    23,553 (5.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,585
    I don't think you mentioned anything that can't be done on my X3370 or even the X3220...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU
  10. shevanel

    shevanel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,464 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Location:
    Leesburg, FL
    well true but I was asked about e6600- q9550 - i7 920... and I am finally content. It was the medicine that cured the urge to need "more". the q9550 was ok, but it still seemed to get choked out fairly easily.
     
  11. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,684 (1.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    402
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    really? hmm i guess its just having experienced an i7 that helps you notice a difference. to me, my q6600 doesnt feel like it chokes. but to each his or her own(and what their wallet can afford XD)
     
  12. shevanel

    shevanel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,464 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Location:
    Leesburg, FL
    when i went from e6600 to q9550 it was like, damn this is sweet.

    when i went from q9550 to i7 it was like, holy shit this is rediculous.

    its not just the cpu, the ram and motherboard also make the difference.
     
  13. T3kl0rd

    T3kl0rd

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    496 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    I hope to go from a P4 to Core i7 930. I expect my reaction to be along the lines of incredulous and perhaps shock.
     
  14. Tatsumaru New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Boston, Massachusetts
    For examp... my Q6600 G0 is a 3.4 ghz and works like a charm !!!
    dont see the point in getting from a quad core to another quadcore,even if its a 45nm against my 65nm technology,
    now the real Jump is what i intend to go from Q6600 a quad core cpu to core i9 with a 6 core cpu on 32 nm !!! now that is what i call diffrence !
     
  15. T3kl0rd

    T3kl0rd

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    496 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Except nothing will recognize your 6 cores for a long time except possibly Windows 7.
     
  16. Kantastic

    Kantastic

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    5,180 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    998
    Well.. I went from a 920 to a P4 and.. well.. it was quite a shock! :roll:
     
  17. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,684 (1.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    402
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    lol. will i9 not be hyper threaded? i'd think it would so that would be 12 threads in task manager :eek: lol. But years ahead of its time for game related use.

    @Tatsumaro: long live our q6600's!!!!!!!!! :laugh:
     
  18. shevanel

    shevanel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,464 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Location:
    Leesburg, FL
    i7 is overkill, so is a 350-400hp daily commuter.. but if it's affordable to you then i'd say do it.

    i went i7 because pc's are a hobby really. it's something to do in my own spare time. i was able to taste different cpu's/setups and the i7 has by far been the most fun, and i havnt even ran it on a powerhouse gpu like my old gtx 275.

    I havent even been able to run triple channel memory yet either.. hence my mobo RMA. So things might get even sweeter when I grab a next gen video card and my board is fully functional.

    I miss kicking back, smokin' a ***** and watching that damn fuzzy donut spin, amongst other things.
     
  19. SonDa5

    SonDa5

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,645 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344

    Agree.

    I want to see some tweaked 32nm flavors in as many sockets as possible!!! :rockout:
     
  20. REVHEAD New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    300 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Sydney/ Australia
    Socket 1366 only, they will not be making 32nm chips for Budget 1156 BOARDS , this is why they are budget. Highend CPUs like the I9 will be 1366 only, so all the cheeseballs that thought they were onto a good upgrade path with the 1156 socket will be in a rock and a hard place, but Intel could change there minds if demand called for it.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  21. vagxtr

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    180 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    No :eek: its not possible they'll disband their newly bred lga1156 just 1-1.5year from its introductio. Does it resemles to something. Damns s754 that fairly saw first E0 Venices on 90nm. If this thingy is really goin' on well then at last will se some of i7 based on 32nm in early Q2 2011 :rolleyes: So it's an worth upgrade :D.

    NTM that i7 860 costs more than i7 920 and first is only dual channel on speculative quality p55 boards that cost almost the same as fully fledged x58. But that's an old sotry now.


    Some of us thought that about x2 introduction in 2005 or when Q6600 was introduced 3years ago :eek: Well q6600 is still good bench cpu but it's time in terms of performance are quickly degraded not a year and half after when qx9650 and whole q9x50 series is introduced. And not even mentioning todays high end that came only nine month after that (2year from Q6600). So we usually saw about of 3 years cycle to some real benchable life for high-end cpu and don't believe that even i9 hexacore 32nm would be more prone to that cycle so i9 930 based only on 4 HT cores a year after Nehalem would be fair CPU for only about 2yrs at most. After that it only be a decent good oldtimer :D
     
  22. T3kl0rd

    T3kl0rd

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    496 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Core i7, the 9xx line especially is the biggest technological leap in central processing power from the previous year that I have seen. This lends itself to the longevity of the CPU and puts the onus on AMD to create something that can equal it in power.
     
  23. vaiopup New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    840 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    192
    Location:
    England
    I would be content just to see the 2 players stick to the same socket for more than 5 minutes.
     
  24. vagxtr

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    180 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Yep if you waving blue flag, otherwise intel really didnt done anything that wasnt available in x86 world since 2003 :D
    And above that if you reconsider how things quickly are outperformed in just a 2-3 generation advancement as i mentioned in earlier post we can hardly dreaming of that commoners i7 920 from begining of this year as king of cpu in next 27 month. Hopefully there would be Bulldozer in some 15month time and Sandy Bridge will follow soon after and that low end Nehalem will have only 40% or less of their power (considering i7 920 OCed to 4.0GHz) in that 27month time
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)