• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i9-11900K "Rocket Lake" AotS Benchmark Numbers Surface

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
40,845 (8.28/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
An alleged Ashes of the Singularity (AotS) benchmark results page for the top 11th Gen Core "Rocket Lake" processor leaked to the web courtesy TUM_APISAK. It's official now that Intel will keep its lengthy processor model number schemes, with the top part being the Core i9-11900K, a successor to the i9-10900K. It also confirms that the "Rocket Lake" silicon caps out at 8-core/16-thread, with performance on virtue of the IPC gains from the new "Cypress Cove" CPU cores."Cypress Cove" is believed to be a back-port of "Willow Cove" to the 14 nm silicon fabrication process that "Rocket Lake-S" is built on.

The screenshot also confirms the nominal clocks (base frequency) of the i9-11900K to be 3.50 GHz, as Intel tends to put base frequency in the name-string of its processors. Paired with a GeForce RTX 3080 and 32 GB of RAM, the i9-11900K-powered machine yielded 62.7 FPS CPU frame-rate at 1440p resolution, and 64.7 FPS CPU frame-rate at 1080p (a mere 3.18% drop in frame-rates from the increase in resolution). These numbers put the i9-11900K in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800X in CPU frame-rates tested under similar conditions.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
177 (0.11/day)
System Name Main
Processor 8700K
Motherboard Maximus Hero X
Cooling EVGA 280 CLC w/ Noctua silent fans
Memory 2x8GB 3600/16
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080TI Hybrid
It's interesting how Intel''s 14nm is keeping some kind of performance parity with TSMC's 7nm, all while having a (dead weight for most gamers) iGPU.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
1,251 (0.78/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator
Processor I7 9900K @ 5.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 5
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Neo 3600mhz 15-15-15-30
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 + Bitspower WB
Storage Plextor 512GB nvme SSD
Display(s) LG OLED CX48"
Case Lian Li 011D Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-5
Power Supply Corsair RM1000
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software Win10
So Rocket Lake is already obsolete before it even release, bravo Intel. Maybe Intel should include the Cryo cooling kit into the package along with their next gen CPU just so that they are a little more competitive.
 
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
124 (0.36/day)
So Rocket Lake is already obsolete before it even release, bravo Intel. Maybe Intel should include the Cryo cooling kit into the package along with their next gen CPU just so that they are a little more competitive.

That's...... an interesting assertion.
Would you mind to elaborate a bit? This article suggest 11900K is competitive against Zen 3 offerings, how is rocket lake ''obsolete''?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
1,251 (0.78/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator
Processor I7 9900K @ 5.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 5
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Neo 3600mhz 15-15-15-30
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 + Bitspower WB
Storage Plextor 512GB nvme SSD
Display(s) LG OLED CX48"
Case Lian Li 011D Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-5
Power Supply Corsair RM1000
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software Win10
That's...... an interesting assertion.
Would you mind to elaborate a bit? This article suggest 11900K is competitive against Zen 3 offerings, how is rocket lake ''obsolete''?

Notice how the 11900K max out at 8 cores, meanwhile 5950X is 16 cores. Intel best is combating against midrange offering from AMD.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
120 (0.22/day)
The fact that Intel is maintaining parity with a node disadvantage is fantastic. And better yet, 8 cores remains the sweet spot for most applications. With availability I see these as a more compelling offering than Zen 3.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
523 (0.66/day)
Seems like they gave up on competing in the core count game.
Max 8 core in main stream CPU
And a completely dead HEDT lineup.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
2,010 (0.35/day)
Location
Calgary Alberta, Canada
System Name PCGR
Processor Intel 10500 ES
Motherboard MSI Z490 Gaming Plus
Cooling Snowman MT4 Dual Fan
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 6800XT Gaming OC
Storage 1x 1tb ADATA XPG 8200 Pro NVME | 1x 1TB WD Blue HDD
Display(s) BenQ 24" 1080P
Case MSI MPG 110M
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Cooler Master 550W MWE 80+ Gold
Software Windows 10 64bit Pro
couldn't they make do without the igpu and add more cores?
 
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
124 (0.36/day)
Notice how the 11900K max out at 8 cores, meanwhile 5950X is 16 cores. Intel best is combating against midrange offering from AMD.

Please be aware that most consumer are still not buying cpu more than 8 core, currently, 4 to 6 core are still mainstream. I found your arguement rather unconvincing, espacially when you are asserting the products are obsolete before release.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
2,090 (0.56/day)
Processor AMD 5900x
Motherboard Asus x570 Strix-E
Cooling Hardware Labs
Memory G.Skill 4000c17 2x16gb
Video Card(s) RTX 3090
Storage Sabrent
Display(s) Samsung G9
Case Phanteks 719
Audio Device(s) Fiio K5 Pro
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2
Mouse Logitech G600
Keyboard Corsair K95
Same league? We need to know the settings cuz a 5600x is scoring almost double what the results in the op at crazy_1440 preset. I didn't see a 5800x in the leaderboards to even choose one. Anyways, I wouldn't be making any assumptions this early.


 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
1,251 (0.78/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator
Processor I7 9900K @ 5.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 5
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Neo 3600mhz 15-15-15-30
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 + Bitspower WB
Storage Plextor 512GB nvme SSD
Display(s) LG OLED CX48"
Case Lian Li 011D Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-5
Power Supply Corsair RM1000
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software Win10
Please be aware that most consumer are still not buying cpu more than 8 core, currently, 4 to 6 core are still mainstream. I found your arguement rather unconvincing, espacially when you are asserting the products are obsolete before release.

What are you even talking about ? Intel Core i9 shouldn't even be in a discussion about mainstream computers, Intel's best has always been reserved for people who want the best, not some middling PC experience. Now people who want the best go for 5900X and 5950X, without any competition from Intel.

And price conscicous people would never consider buying a core i9 in the first place, much less a core i9 that compete with mid range from AMD.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,624 (0.98/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name PC Mustard Race
Processor Intel Core i7 10750H 2.6Ghz - 5Ghz Turbo
Motherboard Laptop H470 Mobo/chipset
Cooling Laptop Cooling
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200Mhz @ 2933Mhz
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 8GB
Storage 512GB WD SN530 M.2
Display(s) 1080p 144hz freesync laptop display || Viewsonic 144hz 1440p Freesynx monitor
Case Laptop Chassis
Audio Device(s) Inbuilt Laptop Realtek Audio
Power Supply 230W Power Brick
Mouse Wireless Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro
Keyboard Laptop RGB Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do em anymore.
Disappointing core count wise, they went 2 cores backwards. Was hoping for at least a 12 core solution for some competitiveness. I haven't been following Intel as much as I use to, will this be working on existing B460/H470/Z490 motherboards?
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
11,629 (4.92/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i5-9600KF
Motherboard NZXT N7 Z370 Black
Cooling Cooler Master 240 RGB AIO / Stock
Memory Thermaltake Toughram 16GB 4400MHz DDR4 or Gigabyte 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 or Adata 8GB 2133Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus Dual 1060 6GB
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
It's interesting how Intel''s 14nm is keeping some kind of performance parity with TSMC's 7nm, all while having an integrated iGPU.
Integrated integrated Graphics Processing Unit?
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
271 (0.08/day)
Points for Intel trying to get back on their feet and reclaim the performance gap to AMD.

Here is the BAD NEWS, since AMD kept a high pricing model for the Ryzen 5000 series Intel will follow that lead and NOT lower the prices. This behavior is in Intel’s DNA, that in any given situation maximize profits even if they are the underdog.

Intel will just match AMD’s price/performance so the new Rocket Lake 8 core will be at approx. same price as Ryzen 5800X is now. People that are waiting for a price war is out of luck, this is the draw back of a duo logy where there are only two competitors.

Only upside is that we are continuously getting more performance out of any given price point since AMD is hell bent to make major performance improvement to each new generation of Ryzen.

If Intel would have had a continuously dominating lead, without competition from AMD, we would only have had main stream desktop CPU’s with 6 cores today.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
516 (0.14/day)
Location
Inside a mini ITX
System Name ITX Desktop
Processor Core i7 9700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus Pro WiFi Z390
Cooling Arctic esports 34 duo.
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming OC White PRO
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Intel SSD 660p
Case NZXT H200
Power Supply Corsair CX Series 750 Watt
It's interesting how Intel''s 14nm is keeping some kind of performance parity with TSMC's 7nm, all while having an integrated iGPU.

Performance parity at 8 or fewer cores and with much higher power consumption. They can't change the laws of physics. That's why they're preparing 10nm chips for laptops/servers where power consumption/transistor density matters.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
177 (0.11/day)
System Name Main
Processor 8700K
Motherboard Maximus Hero X
Cooling EVGA 280 CLC w/ Noctua silent fans
Memory 2x8GB 3600/16
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080TI Hybrid
Integrated integrated Graphics Processing Unit?

Woops! Also I wish Intel would ditch their iGPUs on higher end SKUs like AMD has done, in favor of faster / more efficient chips. They serve a purpose but if you think about it, every single Intel chip from 2700K to 10900K has a massive portion of their CPU die as dead weight for anyone with an even cheap Nvidia or AMD GPU. Any electricity savings they present are null and void most of the time and at least for Nvidia, their video decoding is far and away much better than Intel's anyway.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
120 (0.22/day)
People forget that pricing ultimately dictates the desirability, regardless of the MT difference in perf. Appropriately priced they could embarrass AMD
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,238 (0.73/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
The fact that Intel is maintaining parity with a node disadvantage is fantastic. And better yet, 8 cores remains the sweet spot for most applications. With availability I see these as a more compelling offering than Zen 3.

8 cores remains the sweet spot for most applications? what? you reaaally have to back up that claim because that is as far as I know complete utter bullcrap.
To quote Linus: "if you need 8 cores, you need 12"

The 5800X is the least desirable of AMD's line-up, if you build a gaming rig, you get the 5600X, if you build a workstation its 5900X and up, the 5800X barely has a right to exist and yet that is the one this new Intel chip competes with.

And for your second comment, obviously price dictates all, but Intel will NEVER become the value brand, they add markup just to keep some illusion up of being a premium brand.

Honestly I dont think there will be any appeal to this product what so ever.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 25, 2016
Messages
243 (0.13/day)
System Name 11/2018
Processor I9-9900k 5ghz all cores
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 I Aorus pro wifi
Cooling Custom 240mm cooling (for CPU) with noctua nfa12x25 fans
Memory 32gb Gskill 3200 CL14
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GTX 1080ti, deshrouded with 2x noctua nfa12x25 fans
Storage 1tb samsung 850 pro + 4tb samsung evo basic + (waiting on m2 intel 3dxpoint gen 2 alder lake)
Display(s) 2x AOC curved VA 24" 1080p
Case Ncase m1 v6.1
Audio Device(s) Steelseries arctis pro wireless + Shure SM7b with Steinberg UR
Power Supply Corsair AX1500i (waiting for Seasonic STX 800)
Mouse Logitech G600 (when can we expect a G903 with more buttons Logitech pls?)
Keyboard Sharkoon purewriter (still waiting on Ducky blade...)
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores Over 9000 !
It's interesting how Intel''s 14nm is keeping some kind of performance parity with TSMC's 7nm, all while having a (dead weight for most gamers) iGPU.

That's because AMD can't do CPUs since 2004, it just happens that Intel is doing really bad right now and we get what we have right now.
 
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
124 (0.36/day)
What are you even talking about ? Intel Core i9 shouldn't even be in a discussion about mainstream computers, Intel's best has always been reserved for people who want the best, not some middling PC experience. Now people who want the best go for 5900X and 5950X, without any competition from Intel.

And price conscicous people would never consider buying a core i9 in the first place, much less a core i9 that compete with mid range from AMD.

That will only be valid if you assume Intel are going to price core i9 rocket lake comparable to 5900x/5950x, currently, we don't know anything about pricing yet.

There are no bad product, only bad price, if Intel core i9 is price competitive against AMD mid range, then so be it, it is still not ''obsolete'' before release, as per your assertion.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
930 (0.50/day)
Notice how the 11900K max out at 8 cores, meanwhile 5950X is 16 cores. Intel best is combating against midrange offering from AMD.
Voltage is squared you could certainly argue it's easier to bump up core count from lower node designs than it is to continue to push frequency higher.

Disappointing core count wise, they went 2 cores backwards. Was hoping for at least a 12 core solution for some competitiveness. I haven't been following Intel as much as I use to, will this be working on existing B460/H470/Z490 motherboards?
I think that depends if the 8c chip performs better on average it's reasonable. The efficiency to overall performance relationship matters a fair amount. If Intel managed to get better single thread performance w/o sacrificing much on the multi-thread performance and the design is less of a energy pig that's ok compromise. It's not exciting, but it's fair compromise and boils down to how many can they mass produce with good yields at what price.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
188 (0.13/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 3900x @ 4.35ghz CCD0, 4.25ghz CCD1
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) Vega 64 & Eiswolf GPX-Pro
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 1080p144hz, 1080p60hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
It's interesting how Intel''s 14nm is keeping some kind of performance parity with TSMC's 7nm, all while having a (dead weight for most gamers) iGPU.
while also drawing nearly double the power lol
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
116 (0.03/day)
Same league? We need to know the settings cuz a 5600x is scoring almost double what the results in the op at crazy_1440 preset. I didn't see a 5800x in the leaderboards to even choose one. Anyways, I wouldn't be making any assumptions this early.



Yet the benchmark table is still lead by an ageing i9 9940X running on a 2080 Ti... Let's just say it: AotS is a CPU benchmark, not a graphics benchmark.

What people should be asking is how a 14-core 9940X on a 14nm ++++++ node is still giving AMD a run for its money (mind you, the 9940X is $150 cheaper than the 5950X).
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
283 (0.77/day)
What's the point of comparing it with Zen3? Zen 3 CPUs have become non existent or priced out of most consumers reach. Current prices of CPUs that are actually in stock in Germany: 5600X = €460 ($540), 5800x/5900x nowhere to be found and 5950X priced at €1149 ($1.355). Even Zen 2 prices got inflated again (3600 €230, 3700x €300). AMD made Intel CPUs look like a bargain, i7 10700F going for €286 and I5 10600KF for €219, i5 10400F €142... AMD has FU big time with Zen3 pricing and non availability. Same is true for AIB's RDNA2 pricings... Sapphire 6800XT costing $770, PowerColor $800 and Asus even $900, I mean what the hell, that's pure insanity. It's not like AMD is beating Intel & Ngreedia by +20% performance margin. Don't get me wrong, Zen3/RDNA2 are great products, but it's a shame they're priced out of the market. Only AMD fanboys will buy them at these prices and that's a real shame.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ixi
Top