• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i9-9990XE OEM-only, Even Then it's a Lottery

Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,014 (1.27/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name AMD inside
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.15GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 @ 1200/1350MHz
Storage 3x SSD, 3x HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike 13091 with R9 290 OC H2O
This is what happens when life flashes right before your eyes in RTRT, as one Toms editor put it :fear:
Heh, exactly!
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,446 (1.01/day)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE Custom IHS @ 4.6Ghz 1.23v
Motherboard ASUS Rampage VI Extreme
Cooling EK ROG R6E Monoblock, EK-CoolStream PE 360, EK-CoolStream PE 240, EK X-RES 140 Revo D5 RGB PWM
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB F4-3000C14D 64GB
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 1080Ti Strix OC
Storage Samsung 950 Pro NVME 512GB, 2x 850 Evos 1TB, WD Black 1TB
Display(s) LG 43ud79-b
Case Corsair 500D SE
Power Supply Cooler Master Vanguard Series 1000W
Software Windows 10
Buy i9-9940X, overclock it. EZ Clap

No a 9940X won't do 5Ghz easy 4.8Ghz is pushing it and seeing intel is plucking there dies now on these chips people will be left with more lemons.

Why anyone with brains would pay over 2000eur/usd for a cherry-picked, factory overclocked 9940X? Like I said, the price goes "Apple", like 100eur/usd for 100MHz when comparing those... Why this instead of the real flagship, 18-core 9980XE? MOAR CLOCKS? Yeah.. Clock speed was the thing when we had Pentium 4.

I'd go for 2990WX anyday instead of this.
Clock speed was the thing? <<<< No they push cores now because they can't push higher clocks ill rather a 14 core running at 5+ Ghz out of the box than a 18 core running at 4Ghz, don't forget these chips mite be able to push higher than 5.1Ghz you mite get lucky and push this chip to 5.5Ghz which would be epic but for that price it is a joke.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2015
Messages
513 (0.35/day)
There's always a market for stupid.

Just add enough marketing to make it become mainstream.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
5,185 (2.04/day)
Location
Memphis, TN
System Name Black Prometheus
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @3.9GHz
Motherboard ASRock B350 Pro4
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory SK Hynix 32GB(8GBx4) DDR4 @2666MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2070 XC Ultra Gaming
Storage Sandisk X300 512GB + Seagate 2TB
Display(s) HP LA2405WG 24" Triple Monitor (5760x1200)
Case DeepCool Matrexx 55 w/ 3x120mm Intake + 4x120mm Exhaust
Audio Device(s) Samsung 5.1 Setup
Power Supply Corsair RM750X
Mouse Logitech Trackman
Keyboard Dell OEM
Software Windows 10 EDU x64
No a 9940X won't do 5Ghz easy 4.8Ghz is pushing it and seeing intel is plucking there dies now on these chips people will be left with more lemons.



Clock speed was the thing? <<<< No they push cores now because they can't push higher clocks ill rather a 14 core running at 5+ Ghz out of the box than a 18 core running at 4Ghz, don't forget these chips mite be able to push higher than 5.1Ghz you mite get lucky and push this chip to 5.5Ghz which would be epic but for that price it is a joke.
And unless you have an extreme cooler and big PSU you won’t be seeing 5GHz at all. Boost clocks aren’t gurranteed
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,446 (1.01/day)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE Custom IHS @ 4.6Ghz 1.23v
Motherboard ASUS Rampage VI Extreme
Cooling EK ROG R6E Monoblock, EK-CoolStream PE 360, EK-CoolStream PE 240, EK X-RES 140 Revo D5 RGB PWM
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB F4-3000C14D 64GB
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 1080Ti Strix OC
Storage Samsung 950 Pro NVME 512GB, 2x 850 Evos 1TB, WD Black 1TB
Display(s) LG 43ud79-b
Case Corsair 500D SE
Power Supply Cooler Master Vanguard Series 1000W
Software Windows 10
And unless you have an extreme cooler and big PSU you won’t be seeing 5GHz at all. Boost clocks aren’t gurranteed

Before you start worrying about that on this chip maybe take a step back and look at the Xeon Gold 6138 and the Dominus Extreme, anyone looking at these CPUs would be under water anyways mate.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
704 (0.27/day)
Location
NL
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor INTEL i7-7700K | AMD Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard QUANTA | ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Air cooling 4 heatpipes | Corsair H115i | Noctua NF-A14 IndustrialPPC Fan 3000RPM
Memory Micron 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | GSkill Ripjaws 32Gb DDR4 3200 3400(OC) 14-14-14-34 @1.38v
Video Card(s) Nvidia 1060 6GB | Gigabyte 1080Ti Aorus
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB | 970 Evo
Display(s) 15,5" / 27"
Case Black & Grey | Phanteks P400S
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Li Battery | Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
Mouse g402
Keyboard Leopold|Ducky
Software LinuxMint KDE |UBUNTU | Windows 10 PRO
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
anyway most of people still wanna buy an intel cpu because amd's cpu is bad, hot and slow.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,580 (0.86/day)
The issue with that is, at that absurd price you can buy proper Xeon or Epyc with ECC support.
The intent behind this CPU is having many cores without sacrificing core speed, which both Skylake-X, Xeon-W and especially Threadripper and Epyc fail to deliver, there you see core speeds dropping off with increased core count.

But I do hope Intel revisit the idea on 10nm (without the insane TDP); having many cores as fast as possible, rather than sacrificing core speed for more cores.

But all of it is irrelevant for any business if the new CPU has no warranty and non-existent availability. You don't wanna run your professional suite on a purple unicorn, that's why Puget decided to stick with 9980XE, and that's why most reviews still tend to recommend 7980XE over both "refreshes".
Yeah, as I said, there is little point to a product you can't really buy.
And of course, no warranty is definitely a deal breaker.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
5,185 (2.04/day)
Location
Memphis, TN
System Name Black Prometheus
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X @3.9GHz
Motherboard ASRock B350 Pro4
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory SK Hynix 32GB(8GBx4) DDR4 @2666MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2070 XC Ultra Gaming
Storage Sandisk X300 512GB + Seagate 2TB
Display(s) HP LA2405WG 24" Triple Monitor (5760x1200)
Case DeepCool Matrexx 55 w/ 3x120mm Intake + 4x120mm Exhaust
Audio Device(s) Samsung 5.1 Setup
Power Supply Corsair RM750X
Mouse Logitech Trackman
Keyboard Dell OEM
Software Windows 10 EDU x64
anyway most of people still wanna buy an intel cpu because amd's cpu is bad, hot and slow.
So being less than 10% behind in single threaded apps and ahead in multhreaded apps

Runs much cooler

Is bad

Well I’m glad I own one of those bad CPUs

:roll:



 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
6,216 (2.85/day)
Location
USA
Why bother with the 9990XE when the 9940X is the exact same unlocked CPU that can be OC'd?..
For a small company like Puget it's a bigger risk, and, as you can see, they decided not to take it.
Fixed that for you, go read Puget's statement again.
Puget Systems said:
Given all of those concerns, the small gains made by the Core i9 9990XE do not seem to justify the risks. We will continue to test this processor and monitor the auctions, but for now we do not believe that offering it would be in the best interests of our customers.
And that is exactly the correct move for them.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,014 (1.27/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name AMD inside
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.15GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 @ 1200/1350MHz
Storage 3x SSD, 3x HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike 13091 with R9 290 OC H2O
Why bother with the 9990XE when the 9940X is the exact same unlocked CPU that can be OC'd?..
I guess some users still think that the higher the clocks are, the better the CPU is. So let's brand this higher than our 9980XE which have more cores!
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
6,216 (2.85/day)
Location
USA
No a 9940X won't do 5Ghz easy 4.8Ghz is pushing it and seeing intel is plucking there dies now on these chips people will be left with more lemons.
Rubbish, those chips will do 5ghz with proper cooling, just like the previous chips have done.
And unless you have an extreme cooler and big PSU you won’t be seeing 5GHz at all. Boost clocks aren’t guaranteed
No one running that CPU will be doing it on a crap cooler or PSU. They will be using 1000w+ PSU's with either a solid AIO or custom water cooling.

I guess some users still think that the higher the clocks are, the better the CPU is. So let's brand this higher than our 9980XE which have more cores!
Exactly. This is the real reason Intel is doing private auctions for that chip. The enthusiast community isn't going to buying it in large numbers.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,380 (2.18/day)
in that case wouldn't it be better and potentially cheaper to just buy a bunch of 9940xe and see which one is most overclockable?
How can buying few 9940XE be cheaper than one 9990XE, when it's $1400 vs $2000?
You have some really interesting arithmetics in your universe...
Why this instead of the real flagship, 18-core 9980XE?
Because this will be MOAR CLOCKS? Yeah.. Clock speed was the thing when we had Pentium 4.
Because for some people it will be much faster.
I'd go for 2990WX anyday instead of this.
Which just shows you're a core warrior and not that interested in actual performance. ;-)

First of all: 2990WX has single-thread performance of server CPUs. 9990XE matches 9900K.
In programs that don't benefit from more than 28 threads (and most don't) it could be up to 50% slower. Yey!

And it gets better.
Because of 2990WX very specific architecture (let's leave it like that) in some scenarios it's actually slower than other Threadrippers (with less cores). For example: it's awful for running databases. For reasons unknown to me it also struggles with particular programs (e.g. Handbrake).
In real life 2990WX only works for scenarios with high number of independent threads: rendering, MonteCarlo simulation and so on. But even here it's often matched by 7980XE just based on raw single-core potential.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
3,654 (1.79/day)
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Gigabyte x470 AORUS Ultra Gamin
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Kinkston HyperX @2666 CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX1060 SC 6G
Storage Adata SX8200 256GB, Sandisk X400 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case Chieftec AL-01B-OP
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic 450W 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G503
Keyboard Zalman K500 modded (Gateron brown)
Software Windows 10, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
Why bother with the 9990XE when the 9940X is the exact same unlocked CPU that can be OC'd?..
I think the main pitch was binning and efficiency. Though, I wouldn't trust their 250W TDP on 9990XE either, since 9980XE hits past that mark stock.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,014 (1.27/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name AMD inside
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.15GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 @ 1200/1350MHz
Storage 3x SSD, 3x HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike 13091 with R9 290 OC H2O
Which just shows you're a core warrior and not that interested in actual performance. ;-)

First of all: 2990WX has single-thread performance of server CPUs. 9990XE matches 9900K.
In programs that don't benefit from more than 28 threads (and most don't) it could be up to 50% slower. Yey!

And it gets better.
Because of 2990WX very specific architecture (let's leave it like that) in some scenarios it's actually slower than other Threadrippers (with less cores). For example: it's awful for running databases. For reasons unknown to me it also struggles with particular programs (e.g. Handbrake).
In real life 2990WX only works for scenarios with high number of independent threads: rendering, MonteCarlo simulation and so on. But even here it's often matched by 7980XE just based on raw single-core potential.
I guess. I had a 7700K @ 5.1GHz last spring and I like my Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.1 more. I truly rather more cores than clock speed. This beast can still run games pretty damn fine.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,380 (2.18/day)
I think the main pitch was binning and efficiency. Though, I wouldn't trust their 250W TDP on 9990XE either, since 9980XE hits past that mark stock.
You don't have to worry about it. It's an OEM-only CPU. OEMs will test it and design an appropriate cooling solution.
I guess. I had a 7700K @ 5.1GHz last spring and I like my Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.1 more. I truly rather more cores than clock speed. This beast can still run games pretty damn fine.
One can actually do more things on PCs than just play games...
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,014 (1.27/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name AMD inside
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.15GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 @ 1200/1350MHz
Storage 3x SSD, 3x HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike 13091 with R9 290 OC H2O
One can actually do more things on PCs than just play games...
Someone other maybe, but not me. But who the fuck would get an overpriced, hot-running chip for a workstation? :rolleyes:

He would get the 9980XE, similar Xeon or 2970WX/2990WX..

e: fixed the quote
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
6,216 (2.85/day)
Location
USA
I guess. I had a 7700K @ 5.1GHz last spring and I like my Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.1 more. I truly rather more cores than clock speed. This beast can still run games pretty damn fine.
I've seen similar sentiments expressed by some of my clients. Ryzen has been hitting all the right notes for people who have upgraded from Intel systems. For that reason, I just don't see anyone but enthusiasts rallying around this CPU.

He would get the 9980XE, similar Xeon or 2970WX/2990WX..
Exactly.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,014 (1.27/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name AMD inside
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.15GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 @ 1200/1350MHz
Storage 3x SSD, 3x HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike 13091 with R9 290 OC H2O
I've seen similar sentiments expressed by some of my clients. Ryzen has been hitting all the right notes for people who have upgraded from Intel systems. For that reason, I just don't see anyone but enthusiasts rallying around this CPU.
Price/performance is damn important to me and Ryzen has it, with almost every model. :toast:
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
704 (0.27/day)
Location
NL
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor INTEL i7-7700K | AMD Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard QUANTA | ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Air cooling 4 heatpipes | Corsair H115i | Noctua NF-A14 IndustrialPPC Fan 3000RPM
Memory Micron 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | GSkill Ripjaws 32Gb DDR4 3200 3400(OC) 14-14-14-34 @1.38v
Video Card(s) Nvidia 1060 6GB | Gigabyte 1080Ti Aorus
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB | 970 Evo
Display(s) 15,5" / 27"
Case Black & Grey | Phanteks P400S
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Li Battery | Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
Mouse g402
Keyboard Leopold|Ducky
Software LinuxMint KDE |UBUNTU | Windows 10 PRO
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
So being less than 10% behind in single threaded apps and ahead in multhreaded apps

Runs much cooler

Is bad

Well I’m glad I own one of those bad CPUs

:roll:
well mate, I was just stating a fact.
there are maybe millions of people who know nothing about AMD's current CPU lineup performance
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,497 (1.10/day)
Yeah that's true, the sentiment wrt Intel/Nvidia is akin to Apple, sometimes more hype than substance. Also educating the masses about competition i.e. AMD is a herculean effort, I'd go a step further & add I've literally seen people ask - what is AMD :shadedshu:
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,380 (2.18/day)
Yeah that's true, the sentiment wrt Intel/Nvidia is akin to Apple, sometimes more hype than substance. Also educating the masses about competition i.e. AMD is a herculean effort, I'd go a step further & add I've literally seen people ask - what is AMD:shadedshu:
So?
Of course people don't know what AMD is. They don't need that information. They want PCs for everyday tasks - be it professional or casual.
If there wasn't an "Intel inside" sticker on every PC, they may know much about Intel either. But stickers work. People tend to know that there's something called Intel in the box. That it's either an i3, i5 or i7. That i7 is best. That's literally all they need to know.

You have to understand that computers are not in the centre of everyone's life. People buy PCs like you buy food or shoes or some else that you're not that interested in.
You need something, you buy the brand you know.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,014 (1.27/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name AMD inside
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.15GHz
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Custom loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Asus Radeon R9 290 @ 1200/1350MHz
Storage 3x SSD, 3x HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Logitech G410
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike 13091 with R9 290 OC H2O
So?
Of course people don't know what AMD is. They don't need that information. They want PCs for everyday tasks - be it professional or casual.
If there wasn't an "Intel inside" sticker on every PC, they may know much about Intel either. But stickers work. People tend to know that there's something called Intel in the box. That it's either an i3, i5 or i7. That i7 is best. That's literally all they need to know.

You have to understand that computers are not in the centre of everyone's life. People buy PCs like you buy food or shoes or some else that you're not that interested in.
You need something, you buy the brand you know.
Why you are defending this insane product?

It's like playing chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces down, craps on the table and claims victory.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
923 (0.37/day)
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
System Name Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage V E10 (1801)
Cooling EK RGB Monoblock + EK XRES D5 Revo Glass PWM
Memory CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon
Storage Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB /850 EVO 1TB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung P2450H
Case Lian Li PC-O11 WXC
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G900 / SS QCK
Keyboard Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
i9-9820X is my favorite, and I don't care is it slower in games than i9-9900K.
It's good processor for great platform and long time investment.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,446 (1.01/day)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE Custom IHS @ 4.6Ghz 1.23v
Motherboard ASUS Rampage VI Extreme
Cooling EK ROG R6E Monoblock, EK-CoolStream PE 360, EK-CoolStream PE 240, EK X-RES 140 Revo D5 RGB PWM
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB F4-3000C14D 64GB
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 1080Ti Strix OC
Storage Samsung 950 Pro NVME 512GB, 2x 850 Evos 1TB, WD Black 1TB
Display(s) LG 43ud79-b
Case Corsair 500D SE
Power Supply Cooler Master Vanguard Series 1000W
Software Windows 10
Rubbish, those chips will do 5ghz with proper cooling, just like the previous chips have done.

No one running that CPU will be doing it on a crap cooler or PSU. They will be using 1000w+ PSU's with either a solid AIO or custom water cooling.


Exactly. This is the real reason Intel is doing private auctions for that chip. The enthusiast community isn't going to buying it in large numbers.

LN2 is really a good cooling solution mate.... maybe do some reason before talking out of your ass.
 
Top