• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel DG2 Discrete Xe Graphics Block Diagram Surfaces

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,210 (2.13/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
New details have leaked on Intel's upcoming DG2 graphics accelerator, which could help shed some light on what exactly can be expected from Intel's foray into the discrete graphics department. For one, a product listing shows an Intel DG2 graphic accelerator being paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a Tiger Lake-H CPU (45 W version with 8 cores, which should carry only 32 EUs in integrated graphics hardware). This 8 GB of GDDR6 detail is interesting, as it points towards a 256-bit memory bus - one that is expected to be paired with the 512 EU version of Intel's DG2 (remember that a 384 EU version is also expected, but that one carries only 6 GB of GDDR6, which most likely means a 192-bit bus.

Videocardz says they have received an image for the block diagram on Intel's DG2, pointing towards a 189 mm² die area for the 384 EU version. Looking at component density, it seems that this particular diagram may refer to an MXM design, commonly employed as a discrete notebook solution. 6 total GDDR6 chips are seen in the diagram, thus pointing towards a memory density of 6 GB and the aforementioned 192-bit bus. Other specs that have turned up in the meantime point towards a USB-C interface being available for the DG2, which could either point towards a Thunderbolt 4-supporting design, or something like Virtual Link.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
218 (0.07/day)
I for one is very exited that Intel is entering the discrete GPU market with RTG at the helm.

Maybe the first generation will have some minor drawbacks compared to nvidia BUT I believe they will be fixed til second generation.

Most important is that there will be hard competition in the low and medium GPU segment off the bat and high end segment down the road.

I believe Intel will price aggressively for at lest 2 or 3 generations to get a good market share and secure their future GPU business.

ALSO Thunderbolt 4 built in could be a game changer since this would make it really simple to make cheap GFX upgrades for all laptops with Thunderbolt 4.

External GFX upgrade market for laptops is pretty much untapped, current solutions way to expensive. Intel have a BIG chance to dominate this market before the competition have time to react.

RTG = Raja Technology Group
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
56 (0.39/day)
I would be pleasantly surprised if Intel can offer a Xe GPU with RTX 3070 level performance, 256bit is a bit worrying, however.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
3,567 (1.31/day)
I would be pleasantly surprised if Intel can offer a Xe GPU with RTX 3070 level performance, 256bit is a bit worrying, however.
Say what :wtf:

AMD's having a hard time matching them with an inferior node & you're saying the potato GPU maker will get to basically 2080Ti levels right from the get go o_O
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,358 (0.24/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Riotoro Enigma G2 850W
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
Say what :wtf:

AMD's having a hard time matching them with an inferior node & you're saying the potato GPU maker will get to basically 2080Ti levels right from the get go o_O
oh man you destroyed his joke :laugh:
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
527 (0.37/day)
Location
NJ, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
Say what :wtf:

AMD's having a hard time matching them with an inferior node & you're saying the potato GPU maker will get to basically 2080Ti levels right from the get go o_O
Do we know for a fact that AMD CAN'T make a 2080ti competitor (and actually leaks already point to RDNA2 having a 3080 competitor, so that's easily Surpassing the 2080ti) or that they WON'T? All market data shows that 95%+ of all dGPU sales are sub $500 (with the majority of that being $350 and below). For a company with much, much lower resources than Nvidia, you have to pick your battles and fight where the largest volume of sales is, so in terms of smart business moves, focusing on the segment which commands the bulk of the T.A.M. is wise.

I think people seem to forget that AMD is a multitude smaller than Nvidia, and yet everyone expects them to compete on every front. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I think the fact that AMD is so much smaller and with such a smaller R&D budget yet still able to compete with Nvidia on the most important and profitable segments AND straight up embarrass Intel is seriously impressive.... We're talking about a single, small company (compared to Intel and Nvidia) beating one and hanging with the other... I think that's impressive, and I am certainly thankful for it, otherwise I'd probably have had to pay $1000 for 8 cores from Intel instead of $290 for my 2700x almost two years ago.

While it's nice to see another competitor entering the dGPU market, it would have been much better for consumers if it was a wholly new entity and not Intel.... We need NEW competitors in old markets, not OLD competitors in new markets.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
10,702 (1.99/day)
System Name Desktop / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 6700K @ 4.5GHz (1.270 V) / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz CL15 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 850 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p + 21.5" LG 22MP67VQ IPS 60Hz 1080p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX Onboard / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
25 (0.01/day)
Location
Earth
System Name PredatorX
Processor Intel Core i9-7900X Skylake-X 10-Core 3.3 GHz OC 4.5GHZ
Motherboard EVGA X299 DARK 151-SX-E299-KR
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H80i V2
Memory CORSAIR Dominator Platinum SE Torque 32GB (4 x 8GB) CMD32GX4M4C3200C14T
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Radeon RX Vega 64 DirectX 12 100410NT+SR
Storage SAMSUNG 970 PRO M.2 512GB NVMe PCI-Express 3.0 x4 MZ-V7P512BW
Display(s) Acer XR382CQK IPS 3840x1600 @ 75HZ
Case THERMALTAKE ARMOUR VA8003SWA ATX
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE X-FI FATALITY CHAMPION 7.1
Power Supply CORSAIR AX1200i
Mouse Logitech G500
Software Window 10 64 Pro
Say what :wtf:

AMD's having a hard time matching them with an inferior node & you're saying the potato GPU maker will get to basically 2080Ti levels right from the get go o_O
Boy :banghead:you have no idea???? Eggy AMD about to get crush by intel GPU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!intel will bring 3080 level performance by 2021,you must be new and have lacks of knowledge..........:eek:
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
169 (0.09/day)
The other thing people forget is that Intel is at least 10 times bigger than AMD and nVidia combined. There should be no illusions about Intel's demise. They just got hammered by a multitude of bad things. The comfort of calcking competition for at least half a decade, some bad decisions, problems with the 10nm node, voulnerability issues, the fact that the competition has Ryzen from oblivion... And that all combined is just huge! Yet there they are, pushing R&D into GPUs the way never before. Larrabee was a dead end. The basic concept of many x86 cores used to grapics/HPS was doomed from the get go. This concept now is different. Much more like the competition. And the people hired to work on it are also from the competition. I think the question is not wether they will succeed or not. The question is when.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
25 (0.01/day)
Location
Earth
System Name PredatorX
Processor Intel Core i9-7900X Skylake-X 10-Core 3.3 GHz OC 4.5GHZ
Motherboard EVGA X299 DARK 151-SX-E299-KR
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H80i V2
Memory CORSAIR Dominator Platinum SE Torque 32GB (4 x 8GB) CMD32GX4M4C3200C14T
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Radeon RX Vega 64 DirectX 12 100410NT+SR
Storage SAMSUNG 970 PRO M.2 512GB NVMe PCI-Express 3.0 x4 MZ-V7P512BW
Display(s) Acer XR382CQK IPS 3840x1600 @ 75HZ
Case THERMALTAKE ARMOUR VA8003SWA ATX
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE X-FI FATALITY CHAMPION 7.1
Power Supply CORSAIR AX1200i
Mouse Logitech G500
Software Window 10 64 Pro
They will by 2021
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,597 (1.95/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
They will by 2021
Sure, and when in 2021 they have 2080Ti leveled of performance Nvidia and AMD will have 4080Ti and 7500XT levels of performance.

Raja is smoke and mirrors, which is why he got the boot from AMD.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,712 (0.64/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
I for one is very exited that Intel is entering the discrete GPU market with RTG at the helm.
Maybe the first generation will have some minor drawbacks compared to nvidia BUT I believe they will be fixed til second generation.
Most important is that there will be hard competition in the low and medium GPU segment off the bat and high end segment down the road.
I believe Intel will price aggressively for at lest 2 or 3 generations to get a good market share and secure their future GPU business.
ALSO Thunderbolt 4 built in could be a game changer since this would make it really simple to make cheap GFX upgrades for all laptops with Thunderbolt 4.
External GFX upgrade market for laptops is pretty much untapped, current solutions way to expensive. Intel have a BIG chance to dominate this market before the competition have time to react.
RTG = Raja Technology Group
I doubt they will price aggressively, Intel is like Apple, their products are meant to be the "luxury" item, that is how they profile themselves.
To suddenly go (consumer friendly) cheap with their first jump into gpu's….I doubt it.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
2,736 (2.26/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
The other thing people forget is that Intel is at least 10 times bigger than AMD and nVidia combined. There should be no illusions about Intel's demise. They just got hammered by a multitude of bad things. The comfort of calcking competition for at least half a decade, some bad decisions, problems with the 10nm node, voulnerability issues, the fact that the competition has Ryzen from oblivion... And that all combined is just huge! Yet there they are, pushing R&D into GPUs the way never before. Larrabee was a dead end. The basic concept of many x86 cores used to grapics/HPS was doomed from the get go. This concept now is different. Much more like the competition. And the people hired to work on it are also from the competition. I think the question is not wether they will succeed or not. The question is when.
They also cannot stop making money. They also have some serious resources and manufacturing capability vs the competition.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
25 (0.01/day)
Location
Earth
System Name PredatorX
Processor Intel Core i9-7900X Skylake-X 10-Core 3.3 GHz OC 4.5GHZ
Motherboard EVGA X299 DARK 151-SX-E299-KR
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H80i V2
Memory CORSAIR Dominator Platinum SE Torque 32GB (4 x 8GB) CMD32GX4M4C3200C14T
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Radeon RX Vega 64 DirectX 12 100410NT+SR
Storage SAMSUNG 970 PRO M.2 512GB NVMe PCI-Express 3.0 x4 MZ-V7P512BW
Display(s) Acer XR382CQK IPS 3840x1600 @ 75HZ
Case THERMALTAKE ARMOUR VA8003SWA ATX
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE X-FI FATALITY CHAMPION 7.1
Power Supply CORSAIR AX1200i
Mouse Logitech G500
Software Window 10 64 Pro
This year Nvidia then AMD then intel but next year just reverse it................
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
281 (0.53/day)
Location
USA - Western Massachusetts
System Name Daily Driver(gaming, browsing, light web dev.)
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aurus Pro Wifi
Cooling Corsair H60 w/Nidec GentleTyphoon
Memory 16GB(2x8) G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200C14
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64
Storage Samsung 970 EVO+ 1TB (Boot/OS) | Samsung 860 EVO 1TB (Games) | 2 x WD Spinners 1TB/500GB(BU)
Display(s) 2 X AOC Q3279VWFD8 - 10bit IPS 1440p @ 75hz FreeSync over DP
Case Corsair Graphite 600T w/mesh side
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z625 2.1 | cheapo gaming headset when mic is needed
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Corsair K70 Lux - Blue on Black
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Not really a benchmark guy...
I pray Intel can make something at least competitive in the mid-range. Competitive in price, performance and stability... The market segment really needs competition.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,049 (0.29/day)
I would be pleasantly surprised if Intel can offer a Xe GPU with RTX 3070 level performance, 256bit is a bit worrying, however.
Worrying? If they manage to offer RX580 (=1080p) performance it's good already.
 
Joined
May 5, 2016
Messages
89 (0.06/day)
I doubt they will price aggressively, Intel is like Apple, their products are meant to be the "luxury" item, that is how they profile themselves.
To suddenly go (consumer friendly) cheap with their first jump into gpu's….I doubt it.
To ensure Intel is relevant to developers producing AAA titles it needs meaningful market share in the dGPU space. To gain market share from nothing they need to position their products aggressively.

I suspect Intel's big push will be pairing Intel laptops with an Intel dGPU and offering cost incentives to OEMs to do so. Second to that I suspect those dGPUs will land in the desktop add-in market at a price competitive in the entry-level to medium performance segment.

Intel is no stranger to graphics and I suspect their products will be a great option.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,106 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Do we know for a fact that AMD CAN'T make a 2080ti competitor (and actually leaks already point to RDNA2 having a 3080 competitor, so that's easily Surpassing the 2080ti) or that they WON'T? All market data shows that 95%+ of all dGPU sales are sub $500 (with the majority of that being $350 and below). For a company with much, much lower resources than Nvidia, you have to pick your battles and fight where the largest volume of sales is, so in terms of smart business moves, focusing on the segment which commands the bulk of the T.A.M. is wise.

I think people seem to forget that AMD is a multitude smaller than Nvidia, and yet everyone expects them to compete on every front. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I think the fact that AMD is so much smaller and with such a smaller R&D budget yet still able to compete with Nvidia on the most important and profitable segments AND straight up embarrass Intel is seriously impressive.... We're talking about a single, small company (compared to Intel and Nvidia) beating one and hanging with the other... I think that's impressive, and I am certainly thankful for it, otherwise I'd probably have had to pay $1000 for 8 cores from Intel instead of $290 for my 2700x almost two years ago.

While it's nice to see another competitor entering the dGPU market, it would have been much better for consumers if it was a wholly new entity and not Intel.... We need NEW competitors in old markets, not OLD competitors in new markets.
This is definitely not about picking your battles. High end chips don't sell in volumes, you build that using chips of higher bins, it's not like if you don't do that you gain a lot to divert elsewhere.
The sad truth is the higher end binned chips from AMD just haven't measured up for a few years now. Navi was a pleasant surprise, hopefully Navi2 can build on top of that.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,488 (0.82/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Anyone old enough to remember that Intel's last foray in to graphics was a joke.

I expect nothing different this time (if it actually materializes of which I'm very doubtful).
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
33 (0.09/day)
Worrying? If they manage to offer RX580 (=1080p) performance it's good already.
Every leak so far points to even RX580 being a tall order for the Xe, meanwhile it's already been pushed at least 7-8 months back (was initially supposed to come out this summer) while nvidia and AMD are still moving forward. Intel needs to get its act together, because right now, they are not looking good.

And of course they're a huge company, they're not going to go bankrupt and shut down or anything. Whoever suggested that? IBM is a huge profitable company too, but they have become completely irrelevant to the home market several decades now. They used to make home PCs, you know. If not only AMD but nVidia too held a X86 license I honestly think even intel bankrupting might have been a possibility (however slight), but that's another parallel universe.
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,106 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Anyone old enough to remember that Intel's last foray in to graphics was a joke.

I expect nothing different this time (if it actually materializes of which I'm very doubtful).
Well, since I'm not old enough for memory loss to kick in yet, I still remember i740 being a rather capable and cheap card, despite not being the fastest.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,488 (0.82/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
When the drivers worked.......
 

user112

New Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2018
Messages
15 (0.02/day)
the key to victory for intel on both the CPU and GPU side is having good performance per watt making it better to buy a a new intel GPU than a old Nvidia or AMD GPU. after that it just a matter of making cards at a good price that can consistently hit target settings like 4k120Hz+HDR rather than actually winning vs AMD or Nvidia in raw performance.
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
823 (0.16/day)
Location
Malaysia
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450M-S2H
Cooling Arctic Freezer 64 Pro
Memory 2x8GB Samsung OEM B-die @ 3600 17-19-18-36
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Katana
Storage 120GB Samsung Evo 840 SSD + 2TB Seagate Surveillance 5900rpm
Display(s) 24" LG 24MP59G
Case Mars Gaming MCX Midtower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium HD + Kurtzweil KS-40A bookshelf
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Logitech G402 Hyperion Fury
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire Pro Cherry MX Black
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Well, since I'm not old enough for memory loss to kick in yet, I still remember i740 being a rather capable and cheap card, despite not being the fastest.
I used to play with intel i810 graphics (integrated version for socket 370) with dedicated 4MB VRAM. The only thing I remember about it is how slow it was, and the driver simply awful. RtCW runs with white textures everywhere, but if I load one map and follow one specific path the texture suddenly appear for the rest of the game so each time I need to load that map first before playing.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,106 (4.15/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I used to play with intel i810 graphics (integrated version for socket 370) with dedicated 4MB VRAM. The only thing I remember about it is how slow it was, and the driver simply awful. RtCW runs with white textures everywhere, but if I load one map and follow one specific path the texture suddenly appear for the rest of the game so each time I need to load that map first before playing.
Well, yes, their IGP weren't so great (mostly because those were the early days of IGPs). But that's not what we're talking about here, is it?
 
Top